Literature DB >> 29142115

Males harm females less when competing with familiar relatives.

Samuel J Lymbery1, Leigh W Simmons2.   

Abstract

Sexual conflict occurs when reproductive partners have different fitness optima, and can lead to the evolution of traits in one sex that inflict fitness costs on the opposite sex. Recently, it has been proposed that antagonism by males towards females should be reduced when they compete with relatives, because reducing the future productivity of a female would result in an indirect fitness cost for a harmful male. We tested this prediction in the seed beetle Callosobruchus maculatus, the males of which harm females with genital spines and pre-copulatory harassment. We compared lifespan, lifetime egg production and lifetime offspring production among females housed with groups of males that varied in their familiarity and relatedness. Females produced significantly more eggs and offspring when grouped with males who were both related and familiar to each other. There was no effect of male relatedness or familiarity on female lifespan. Our results suggest that males plastically adjust their harmfulness towards females in response to changes in inclusive fitness payoffs, and that in this species both genetic relatedness and social familiarity mediate this effect.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Callosobruchus maculatus; inclusive fitness; kin recognition; kin selection; relatedness; sexual conflict

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29142115      PMCID: PMC5719177          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2017.1984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  34 in total

1.  Single-gene greenbeard effects in the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  David C Queller; Eleonora Ponte; Salvatore Bozzaro; Joan E Strassmann
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Assortative mating for relatedness in a large naturally occurring population of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Stephen P Robinson; W J Kennington; L W Simmons
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 3.  The sociobiology of sex: inclusive fitness consequences of inter-sexual interactions.

Authors:  Tommaso Pizzari; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The evolution of harm--effect of sexual conflicts and population size.

Authors:  Laurène Gay; David J Hosken; Paul Eady; Ram Vasudev; Tom Tregenza
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  The genetic architecture of sexual conflict: male harm and female resistance in Callosobruchus maculatus.

Authors:  L Gay; E Brown; T Tregenza; D Pincheira-Donoso; P E Eady; R Vasudev; J Hunt; D J Hosken
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  Fine-scale kin recognition in the absence of social familiarity in the Siberian jay, a monogamous bird species.

Authors:  Michael Griesser; Peter Halvarsson; Szymon M Drobniak; Carles Vilà
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  Are flies kind to kin? The role of intra- and inter-sexual relatedness in mediating reproductive conflict.

Authors:  Emily S Martin; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Sexual conflict over mating and fertilization: an overview.

Authors:  G A Parker
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Kin selection promotes female productivity and cooperation between the sexes.

Authors:  Aleksandra Łukasiewicz; Agnieszka Szubert-Kruszyńska; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Related male Drosophila melanogaster reared together as larvae fight less and sire longer lived daughters.

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Jennifer C Perry; Fern Johnson; Tommaso Pizzari; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-06-24       Impact factor: 2.912

View more
  8 in total

1.  Males harm females less when competing with familiar relatives.

Authors:  Samuel J Lymbery; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Males optimally balance selfish and kin-selected strategies of sexual competition in the guppy.

Authors:  Mitchel J Daniel; Robert J Williamson
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Quantifying variation in female internal genitalia: no evidence for plasticity in response to sexual conflict risk in a seed beetle.

Authors:  Blake W Wyber; Liam R Dougherty; Kathryn McNamara; Andrew Mehnert; Jeremy Shaw; Joseph L Tomkins; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Sex-biased demography modulates male harm across the genome.

Authors:  Thomas J Hitchcock; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  No evidence that relatedness or familiarity modulates male harm in Drosophila melanogaster flies from a wild population.

Authors:  Ana Marquez-Rosado; Clara Garcia-Co; Claudia Londoño-Nieto; Pau Carazo
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Experimental evolution reveals differential evolutionary trajectories in male and female activity levels in response to sexual selection and metapopulation structure.

Authors:  David Canal; László Zsolt Garamszegi; Eduardo Rodriguez-Exposito; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.171

7.  Kin but less than kind: within-group male relatedness does not increase female fitness in seed beetles.

Authors:  Elena C Berg; Martin I Lind; Shannon Monahan; Sophie Bricout; Alexei A Maklakov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Inclusive fitness benefits mitigate costs of cuckoldry to socially paired males.

Authors:  Aneesh P H Bose; Jonathan M Henshaw; Holger Zimmermann; Karoline Fritzsche; Kristina M Sefc
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 7.431

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.