Literature DB >> 21126275

The genetic architecture of sexual conflict: male harm and female resistance in Callosobruchus maculatus.

L Gay1, E Brown, T Tregenza, D Pincheira-Donoso, P E Eady, R Vasudev, J Hunt, D J Hosken.   

Abstract

Males harm females during mating in a range of species. This harm is thought to evolve because it is directly or indirectly beneficial to the male, despite being costly to his mate. The resulting sexually antagonistic selection can cause sexual arms races. For sexually antagonistic co-evolution to occur, there must be genetic variation for traits involved in female harming and susceptibility to harm, but even then intersexual genetic correlations could facilitate or impede sexual co-evolution. Male Callosobruchus maculatus harm their mates during copulation by damaging the female's reproductive tract. However, there have been no investigations of the genetic variation in damage or in female susceptibility to damage, nor has the genetic covariance between these characters been assessed. Here, we use a full-sib/half-sib breeding design to show that male damage is heritable, whereas female susceptibility to damage is much less so. There is also a substantial positive genetic correlation between the two, suggesting that selection favouring damaging males will increase the prevalence of susceptible females. We also provide evidence consistent with intralocus sexual conflict in this species.
© 2010 The Authors. Journal of Evolutionary Biology © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21126275     DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02182.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  7 in total

1.  Estimation of heritability, evolvability and genetic correlations of two pollen and pistil traits involved in a sexual conflict over timing of stigma receptivity in Collinsia heterophylla (Plantaginaceae).

Authors:  Josefin A Madjidian; Stefan Andersson; Asa Lankinen
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 4.357

Review 2.  Mechanisms and Evidence of Genital Coevolution: The Roles of Natural Selection, Mate Choice, and Sexual Conflict.

Authors:  Patricia L R Brennan; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Males harm females less when competing with familiar relatives.

Authors:  Samuel J Lymbery; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sexual selection, environmental robustness, and evolutionary demography of maladapted populations: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles.

Authors:  Ivain Martinossi-Allibert; Emma Thilliez; Göran Arnqvist; David Berger
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.183

5.  Stronger net selection on males across animals.

Authors:  Lennart Winkler; Maria Moiron; Edward H Morrow; Tim Janicke
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 8.140

6.  Evolution of reproductive isolation as a by-product of divergent life-history evolution in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Shampa M Ghosh; Amitabh Joshi
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Pre and Post-copulatory Selection Favor Similar Genital Phenotypes in the Male Broad Horned Beetle.

Authors:  Clarissa M House; M D Sharma; Kensuke Okada; David J Hosken
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.326

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.