Literature DB >> 26674954

Are flies kind to kin? The role of intra- and inter-sexual relatedness in mediating reproductive conflict.

Emily S Martin1, Tristan A F Long2.   

Abstract

As individual success often comes at the expense of others, interactions between the members of a species are frequently antagonistic, especially in the context of reproduction. In theory, this conflict may be reduced in magnitude when kin interact, as cooperative behaviour between relatives can result in increased inclusive fitness. Recent tests of the potential role of cooperative behaviour between brothers in Drosophila melanogaster have proved to be both exciting and controversial. We set out to replicate these experiments, which have profound implications for the study of kin selection and sexual conflict, and to expand upon them by also examining the potential role of kinship between males and females in reproductive interactions. While we did observe reduced fighting and courtship effort between competing brothers, contrary to previous studies we did not detect any fitness benefit to females as a result of the modification of male antagonistic behaviours. Furthermore, we did not observe any differential treatment of females by their brothers, as would be expected if the intensity of sexual conflict was mediated by kin selection. In the light of these results, we propose an alternative explanation for observed differences in male-male conflict and provide preliminary empirical support for this hypothesis.
© 2015 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  aggression; inclusive fitness; kin selection; sexual conflict; sexual selection; social behaviour

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26674954      PMCID: PMC4707750          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.1991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  37 in total

Review 1.  Drosophila: genetics meets behaviour.

Authors:  M B Sokolowski
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Cooperation and competition between relatives.

Authors:  Stuart A West; Ido Pen; Ashleigh S Griffin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  When not to avoid inbreeding.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Indrek Ots
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  The effect of sexual harassment on lethal mutation rate in female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alexei A Maklakov; Simone Immler; Hanne Løvlie; Ilona Flis; Urban Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Learning and memory associated with aggression in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alexandra Yurkovic; Oulu Wang; Alo C Basu; Edward A Kravitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Genes regulated by mating, sperm, or seminal proteins in mated female Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Lisa A McGraw; Greg Gibson; Andrew G Clark; Mariana F Wolfner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Evolution and genetic control of mate recognition and stimulation in Drosophila.

Authors:  M Cobb; J F Ferveur
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Indirect genetic effects and the evolution of aggression in a vertebrate system.

Authors:  Alastair J Wilson; Uriel Gelin; Marie-Claude Perron; Denis Réale
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Within-group male relatedness reduces harm to females in Drosophila.

Authors:  Pau Carazo; Cedric K W Tan; Felicity Allen; Stuart Wigby; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  12 in total

1.  Males harm females less when competing with familiar relatives.

Authors:  Samuel J Lymbery; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Genetic variation in male-induced harm in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  David C S Filice; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Males optimally balance selfish and kin-selected strategies of sexual competition in the guppy.

Authors:  Mitchel J Daniel; Robert J Williamson
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 15.460

4.  Inbreeding parents should invest more resources in fewer offspring.

Authors:  A Bradley Duthie; Aline M Lee; Jane M Reid
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Male relatedness and familiarity are required to modulate male-induced harm to females in Drosophila.

Authors:  Sally Le Page; Irem Sepil; Ewan Flintham; Tommaso Pizzari; Pau Carazo; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Kin selection promotes female productivity and cooperation between the sexes.

Authors:  Aleksandra Łukasiewicz; Agnieszka Szubert-Kruszyńska; Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 14.136

7.  Sexual selection modulates genetic conflicts and patterns of genomic imprinting.

Authors:  Gonçalo S Faria; Susana A M Varela; Andy Gardner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Phenotypic plasticity in female mate choice behavior is mediated by an interaction of direct and indirect genetic effects in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  David C S Filice; Tristan A F Long
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  The contrasting role of male relatedness in different mechanisms of sexual selection in red junglefowl.

Authors:  Cedric Kai Wei Tan; Philippa Doyle; Emma Bagshaw; David S Richardson; Stuart Wigby; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Kin but less than kind: within-group male relatedness does not increase female fitness in seed beetles.

Authors:  Elena C Berg; Martin I Lind; Shannon Monahan; Sophie Bricout; Alexei A Maklakov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.