Literature DB >> 29116058

A line fiducial method for geometric calibration of cone-beam CT systems with diverse scan trajectories.

M W Jacobson1, M D Ketcha, S Capostagno, A Martin, A Uneri, J Goerres, T De Silva, S Reaungamornrat, R Han, A Manbachi, J W Stayman, S Vogt, G Kleinszig, J H Siewerdsen.   

Abstract

Modern cone-beam CT systems, especially C-arms, are capable of diverse source-detector orbits. However, geometric calibration of these systems using conventional configurations of spherical fiducials (BBs) may be challenged for novel source-detector orbits and system geometries. In part, this is because the BB configurations are designed with careful forethought regarding the intended orbit so that BB marker projections do not overlap in projection views. Examples include helical arrangements of BBs (Rougee et al 1993 Proc. SPIE 1897 161-9) such that markers do not overlap in projections acquired from a circular orbit and circular arrangements of BBs (Cho et al 2005 Med. Phys. 32 968-83). As a more general alternative, this work proposes a calibration method based on an array of line-shaped, radio-opaque wire segments. With this method, geometric parameter estimation is accomplished by relating the 3D line equations representing the wires to the 2D line equations of their projections. The use of line fiducials simplifies many challenges with fiducial recognition and extraction in an orbit-independent manner. For example, their projections can overlap only mildly, for any gantry pose, as long as the wires are mutually non-coplanar in 3D. The method was tested in application to circular and non-circular trajectories in simulation and in real orbits executed using a mobile C-arm prototype for cone-beam CT. Results indicated high calibration accuracy, as measured by forward and backprojection/triangulation error metrics. Triangulation errors on the order of microns and backprojected ray deviations uniformly less than 0.2 mm were observed in both real and simulated orbits. Mean forward projection errors less than 0.1 mm were observed in a comprehensive sweep of different C-arm gantry angulations. Finally, successful integration of the method into a CT imaging chain was demonstrated in head phantom scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29116058      PMCID: PMC5868366          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  28 in total

1.  Flat-panel cone-beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.

Authors:  David A Jaffray; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen; John W Wong; Alvaro A Martinez
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Image reconstruction for the circle-and-arc trajectory.

Authors:  Alexander Katsevich
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A geometric calibration method for cone beam CT systems.

Authors:  Kai Yang; Alexander L C Kwan; DeWitt F Miller; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Simultaneous misalignment correction for approximate circular cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Y Kyriakou; R M Lapp; L Hillebrand; D Ertel; W A Kalender
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Image reconstruction in reduced circular sinusoidal cone-beam CT.

Authors:  Dan Xia; Seungryong Cho; Xiaochuan Pan
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.535

6.  Geometric calibration of a micro-CT system and performance for insect imaging.

Authors:  Zhanli Hu; Jianbao Gui; Jing Zou; Junyan Rong; Qiyang Zhang; Hairong Zheng; Dan Xia
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2011-06-09

7.  Simultaneous calibration phantom commission and geometry calibration in cone beam CT.

Authors:  Yuan Xu; Shuai Yang; Jianhui Ma; Bin Li; Shuyu Wu; Hongliang Qi; Linghong Zhou
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  The dual-ellipse cross vertex path for exact reconstruction of long objects in cone-beam tomography.

Authors:  F Noo; R Clack; T A White; T J Roney
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Ordered subsets algorithms for transmission tomography.

Authors:  H Erdogan; J A Fessler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial imaging: dose matters.

Authors:  Ruben Pauwels
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 0.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.