Literature DB >> 29113935

Predicting age by mining electronic medical records with deep learning characterizes differences between chronological and physiological age.

Zichen Wang1, Li Li2, Benjamin S Glicksberg2, Ariel Israel3, Joel T Dudley2, Avi Ma'ayan4.   

Abstract

Determining the discrepancy between chronological and physiological age of patients is central to preventative and personalized care. Electronic medical records (EMR) provide rich information about the patient physiological state, but it is unclear whether such information can be predictive of chronological age. Here we present a deep learning model that uses vital signs and lab tests contained within the EMR of Mount Sinai Health System (MSHS) to predict chronological age. The model is trained on 377,686 EMR from patients of ages 18-85 years old. The discrepancy between the predicted and real chronological age is then used as a proxy to estimate physiological age. Overall, the model can predict the chronological age of patients with a standard deviation error of ∼7 years. The ages of the youngest and oldest patients were more accurately predicted, while patients of ages ranging between 40 and 60 years were the least accurately predicted. Patients with the largest discrepancy between their physiological and chronological age were further inspected. The patients predicted to be significantly older than their chronological age have higher systolic blood pressure, higher cholesterol, damaged liver, and anemia. In contrast, patients predicted to be younger than their chronological age have lower blood pressure and shorter stature among other indicators; both groups display lower weight than the population average. Using information from ∼10,000 patients from the entire cohort who have been also profiled with SNP arrays, genome-wide association study (GWAS) uncovers several novel genetic variants associated with aging. In particular, significant variants were mapped to genes known to be associated with inflammation, hypertension, lipid metabolism, height, and increased lifespan in mice. Several genes with missense mutations were identified as novel candidate aging genes. In conclusion, we demonstrate how EMR data can be used to assess overall health via a scale that is based on deviation from the patient's predicted chronological age.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age prediction; Aging; Deep learning; Machine learning; Medical records

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29113935      PMCID: PMC5716867          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2017.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Inform        ISSN: 1532-0464            Impact factor:   6.317


  39 in total

1.  A linear complexity phasing method for thousands of genomes.

Authors:  Olivier Delaneau; Jonathan Marchini; Jean-François Zagury
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes.

Authors:  Matthew D Mailman; Michael Feolo; Yumi Jin; Masato Kimura; Kimberly Tryka; Rinat Bagoutdinov; Luning Hao; Anne Kiang; Justin Paschall; Lon Phan; Natalia Popova; Stephanie Pretel; Lora Ziyabari; Moira Lee; Yu Shao; Zhen Y Wang; Karl Sirotkin; Minghong Ward; Michael Kholodov; Kerry Zbicz; Jeffrey Beck; Michael Kimelman; Sergey Shevelev; Don Preuss; Eugene Yaschenko; Alan Graeff; James Ostell; Stephen T Sherry
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  LongevityMap: a database of human genetic variants associated with longevity.

Authors:  Arie Budovsky; Thomas Craig; Jingwei Wang; Robi Tacutu; Attila Csordas; Joana Lourenço; Vadim E Fraifeld; João Pedro de Magalhães
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 4.  MARK-AGE biomarkers of ageing.

Authors:  Alexander Bürkle; María Moreno-Villanueva; Jürgen Bernhard; María Blasco; Gerben Zondag; Jan H J Hoeijmakers; Olivier Toussaint; Beatrix Grubeck-Loebenstein; Eugenio Mocchegiani; Sebastiano Collino; Efstathios S Gonos; Ewa Sikora; Daniela Gradinaru; Martijn Dollé; Michel Salmon; Peter Kristensen; Helen R Griffiths; Claude Libert; Tilman Grune; Nicolle Breusing; Andreas Simm; Claudio Franceschi; Miriam Capri; Duncan Talbot; Paola Caiafa; Bertrand Friguet; P Eline Slagboom; Antti Hervonen; Mikko Hurme; Richard Aspinall
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 5.432

5.  Population Structure of UK Biobank and Ancient Eurasians Reveals Adaptation at Genes Influencing Blood Pressure.

Authors:  Kevin J Galinsky; Po-Ru Loh; Swapan Mallick; Nick J Patterson; Alkes L Price
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Why men age faster but reproduce longer than women: mTOR and evolutionary perspectives.

Authors:  Mikhail V Blagosklonny
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.682

7.  Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes.

Authors:  David Croft; Gavin O'Kelly; Guanming Wu; Robin Haw; Marc Gillespie; Lisa Matthews; Michael Caudy; Phani Garapati; Gopal Gopinath; Bijay Jassal; Steven Jupe; Irina Kalatskaya; Shahana Mahajan; Bruce May; Nelson Ndegwa; Esther Schmidt; Veronica Shamovsky; Christina Yung; Ewan Birney; Henning Hermjakob; Peter D'Eustachio; Lincoln Stein
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update.

Authors:  Maxim V Kuleshov; Matthew R Jones; Andrew D Rouillard; Nicolas F Fernandez; Qiaonan Duan; Zichen Wang; Simon Koplev; Sherry L Jenkins; Kathleen M Jagodnik; Alexander Lachmann; Michael G McDermott; Caroline D Monteiro; Gregory W Gundersen; Avi Ma'ayan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-03       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  A proposed panel of biomarkers of healthy ageing.

Authors:  Jose Lara; Rachel Cooper; Jack Nissan; Annie T Ginty; Kay-Tee Khaw; Ian J Deary; Janet M Lord; Diana Kuh; John C Mathers
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  DNA methylation age of human tissues and cell types.

Authors:  Steve Horvath
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 13.583

View more
  10 in total

1.  Using convolutional neural networks to identify patient safety incident reports by type and severity.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Enrico Coiera; Farah Magrabi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Pre-injury health status and excess mortality in persons with traumatic brain injury: A decade-long historical cohort study.

Authors:  Tatyana Mollayeva; Mackenzie Hurst; Vincy Chan; Michael Escobar; Mitchell Sutton; Angela Colantonio
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2020-07-18       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Multi-Omic Biological Age Estimation and Its Correlation With Wellness and Disease Phenotypes: A Longitudinal Study of 3,558 Individuals.

Authors:  John C Earls; Noa Rappaport; Laura Heath; Tomasz Wilmanski; Andrew T Magis; Nicholas J Schork; Gilbert S Omenn; Jennifer Lovejoy; Leroy Hood; Nathan D Price
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 4.  High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Eric J Topol
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 5.  Deep learning for biological age estimation.

Authors:  Syed Ashiqur Rahman; Peter Giacobbi; Lee Pyles; Charles Mullett; Gianfranco Doretto; Donald A Adjeroh
Journal:  Brief Bioinform       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 11.622

6.  Predicting opioid dependence from electronic health records with machine learning.

Authors:  Randall J Ellis; Zichen Wang; Nicholas Genes; Avi Ma'ayan
Journal:  BioData Min       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.522

7.  Extracting biological age from biomedical data via deep learning: too much of a good thing?

Authors:  Timothy V Pyrkov; Konstantin Slipensky; Mikhail Barg; Alexey Kondrashin; Boris Zhurov; Alexander Zenin; Mikhail Pyatnitskiy; Leonid Menshikov; Sergei Markov; Peter O Fedichev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Opportunities and challenges in developing deep learning models using electronic health records data: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cao Xiao; Edward Choi; Jimeng Sun
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  The Kidney-Gut-Muscle Axis in End-Stage Renal Disease is Similarly Represented in Older Adults.

Authors:  Michael S Lustgarten
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 5.717

Review 10.  Computational Methods for Single-Cell Imaging and Omics Data Integration.

Authors:  Ebony Rose Watson; Atefeh Taherian Fard; Jessica Cara Mar
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-01-17
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.