Literature DB >> 34818430

Implementing in vitro bioactivity data to modernize priority setting of chemical inventories.

Marc A Beal1, Matthew Gagne1, Sunil A Kulkarni1, Grace Patlewicz2, Russell S Thomas2, Tara S Barton-Maclaren1.   

Abstract

Internationally, there are thousands of existing and newly introduced chemicals in commerce, highlighting the ongoing importance of innovative approaches to identify emerging chemicals of concern. For many chemicals, there is a paucity of hazard and exposure data. Thus, there is a crucial need for efficient and robust approaches to address data gaps and support risk-based prioritization. Several studies have demonstrated the utility of in vitro bioactivity data from the ToxCast program in deriving points of departure (PODs). ToxCast contains data for nearly 1,400 endpoints per chemical, and the bioactivity concentrations, indicative of potential adverse outcomes, can be converted to human-equivalent PODs using high-throughput toxicokinetics (HTTK) modeling. However, data gaps need to be addressed for broader application: the limited chemical space of HTTK and quantitative high-throughput screening data. Here we explore the applicability of in silico models to address these data needs. Specifically, we used ADMET predictor for HTTK predictions and a generalized read-across approach to predict ToxCast bioactivity potency. We applied these models to profile 5,801 chemicals on Canada’s Domestic Substances List (DSL). To evaluate the approach’s performance, bioactivity PODs were compared with in vivo results from the EPA Toxicity Values database for 1,042 DSL chemicals. Comparisons demonstrated that the bioac­tivity PODs, based on ToxCast data or read-across, were conservative for 95% of the chemicals. Comparing bioactivity PODs to human exposure estimates supports the identification of chemicals of potential interest for further work. The bioac­tivity workflow shows promise as a powerful screening tool to support effective triaging of chemical inventories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evidence-based risk assessment; high-throughput screening; high-throughput toxicokinetics; new approach methodologies; read-across

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34818430      PMCID: PMC8973434          DOI: 10.14573/altex.2106171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ALTEX        ISSN: 1868-596X            Impact factor:   6.043


  70 in total

1.  Toxicokinetic Triage for Environmental Chemicals.

Authors:  John F Wambaugh; Barbara A Wetmore; Robert Pearce; Cory Strope; Rocky Goldsmith; James P Sluka; Alexander Sedykh; Alex Tropsha; Sieto Bosgra; Imran Shah; Richard Judson; Russell S Thomas; R Woodrow Setzer
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Prioritizing chemicals of ecological concern in Great Lakes tributaries using high-throughput screening data and adverse outcome pathways.

Authors:  Steven R Corsi; Laura A De Cicco; Daniel L Villeneuve; Brett R Blackwell; Kellie A Fay; Gerald T Ankley; Austin K Baldwin
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  High-Throughput Transcriptomics Platform for Screening Environmental Chemicals.

Authors:  Joshua A Harrill; Logan J Everett; Derik E Haggard; Thomas Sheffield; Joseph L Bundy; Clinton M Willis; Russell S Thomas; Imran Shah; Richard S Judson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  ToxCast Chemical Landscape: Paving the Road to 21st Century Toxicology.

Authors:  Ann M Richard; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Christopher M Grulke; Patra Volarath; Inthirany Thillainadarajah; Chihae Yang; James Rathman; Matthew T Martin; John F Wambaugh; Thomas B Knudsen; Jayaram Kancherla; Kamel Mansouri; Grace Patlewicz; Antony J Williams; Stephen B Little; Kevin M Crofton; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  Investigating the Generalizability of the MultiFlow ® DNA Damage Assay and Several Companion Machine Learning Models With a Set of 103 Diverse Test Chemicals.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Derek T Bernacki; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Kristine L Witt; Jeffrey C Bemis; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD): A case study applying tiered testing for human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Anne Marie Gannon; Marjory Moreau; Reza Farmahin; Russell S Thomas; Tara S Barton-Maclaren; Andy Nong; Ivan Curran; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 6.023

Review 7.  Scaling factors for the extrapolation of in vivo metabolic drug clearance from in vitro data: reaching a consensus on values of human microsomal protein and hepatocellularity per gram of liver.

Authors:  Zoe E Barter; Martin K Bayliss; Philip H Beaune; Alan R Boobis; David J Carlile; Robert J Edwards; J Brian Houston; Brian G Lake; John C Lipscomb; Olavi R Pelkonen; Geoffrey T Tucker; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.731

8.  Utility of In Vitro Bioactivity as a Lower Bound Estimate of In Vivo Adverse Effect Levels and in Risk-Based Prioritization.

Authors:  Katie Paul Friedman; Matthew Gagne; Lit-Hsin Loo; Panagiotis Karamertzanis; Tatiana Netzeva; Tomasz Sobanski; Jill A Franzosa; Ann M Richard; Ryan R Lougee; Andrea Gissi; Jia-Ying Joey Lee; Michelle Angrish; Jean Lou Dorne; Stiven Foster; Kathleen Raffaele; Tina Bahadori; Maureen R Gwinn; Jason Lambert; Maurice Whelan; Mike Rasenberg; Tara Barton-Maclaren; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Conditional Toxicity Value (CTV) Predictor: An In Silico Approach for Generating Quantitative Risk Estimates for Chemicals.

Authors:  Jessica A Wignall; Eugene Muratov; Alexander Sedykh; Kathryn Z Guyton; Alexander Tropsha; Ivan Rusyn; Weihsueh A Chiu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Incorporating new approach methodologies in toxicity testing and exposure assessment for tiered risk assessment using the RISK21 approach: Case studies on food contact chemicals.

Authors:  Alexandra E Turley; Kristin K Isaacs; Barbara A Wetmore; Agnes L Karmaus; Michelle R Embry; Mansi Krishan
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 6.023

View more
  2 in total

1.  Comprehensive interpretation of in vitro micronucleus test results for 292 chemicals: from hazard identification to risk assessment application.

Authors:  Byron Kuo; Marc A Beal; John W Wills; Paul A White; Francesco Marchetti; Andy Nong; Tara S Barton-Maclaren; Keith Houck; Carole L Yauk
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 6.168

2.  Prioritization of chemicals in food for risk assessment by integrating exposure estimates and new approach methodologies: A next generation risk assessment case study.

Authors:  Mirjam Luijten; R Corinne Sprong; Emiel Rorije; Leo T M van der Ven
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-19
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.