Literature DB >> 34718711

Biomarkers of DNA damage response improve in vitro micronucleus assays by revealing genotoxic mode of action and reducing the occurrence of irrelevant positive results.

Svetlana Avlasevich1, Tina Pellegrin1, Manali Godse2, Steven Bryce1, Jeffrey Bemis1, Peter Bajorski2, Stephen Dertinger1.   

Abstract

We have previously described two flow cytometry-based in vitro genotoxicity tests: micronucleus (MN) scoring (MicroFlow®) and a multiplexed DNA damage response biomarker assay (MultiFlow®). Here, we describe a strategy for combining the assays in order to efficiently supplement MN analyses with a panel of biomarkers that comment on cytotoxicity (i.e. relative nuclei count, relative increased nuclei count, cleaved PARP-positive chromatin and ethidium monoazide-positive chromatin) and genotoxic mode of action (MoA; i.e. γH2AX, phospho-histone H3, p53 activation and polyploidy). For these experiments, human TK6 cells were exposed to each of 32 well-studied reference chemicals in 96-well plates for 24 continuous hours. The test chemicals were evaluated over a range of concentrations in the presence and absence of a rat liver S9-based metabolic activation system. MultiFlow assay data were acquired at 4 and 24 h, and micronuclei were scored at 24 h. Testing 32 chemicals in two metabolic activation arms translated into 64 a priori calls: 42 genotoxicants and 22 non-genotoxicants. The MN assay showed high sensitivity and moderate specificity (90% and 68%, respectively). When a genotoxic call required significant MN and MultiFlow responses, specificity increased to 95% without adversely affecting sensitivity. The dose-response data were analysed with PROAST Benchmark Dose (BMD) software in order to calculate potency metrics for each endpoint, and ToxPi software was used to synthesise the resulting lower and upper bound 90% confidence intervals into visual profiles. The BMD/ToxPi combination was found to represent a powerful strategy for synthesising multiple BMD confidence intervals, as the software output provided MoA information as well as insights into genotoxic potency.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the UK Environmental Mutagen Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34718711      PMCID: PMC8633886          DOI: 10.1093/mutage/geab039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutagenesis        ISSN: 0267-8357            Impact factor:   3.000


  43 in total

Review 1.  1,2-Dimethylhydrazine.

Authors: 
Journal:  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum       Date:  1999

Review 2.  Flow cytometric analysis of micronuclei in mammalian cell cultures: past, present and future.

Authors:  Svetlana Avlasevich; Steven Bryce; Marlies De Boeck; Azeddine Elhajouji; Freddy Van Goethem; Anthony Lynch; John Nicolette; Jing Shi; Stephen Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  In vitro micronucleus scoring by flow cytometry: differential staining of micronuclei versus apoptotic and necrotic chromatin enhances assay reliability.

Authors:  Svetlana L Avlasevich; Steven M Bryce; Siân E Cairns; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Regulation of brefeldin A-induced ER stress and apoptosis by mitochondrial NADP⁺-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  Jung Lee Moon; Sung Youl Kim; Seoung Woo Shin; Jeen-Woo Park
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 5.  Estimating the carcinogenic potency of chemicals from the in vivo micronucleus test.

Authors:  Lya G Soeteman-Hernández; George E Johnson; Wout Slob
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Flow cytometric 96-well microplate-based in vitro micronucleus assay with human TK6 cells: protocol optimization and transferability assessment.

Authors:  Steven M Bryce; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Jeffrey C Bemis; Matthew Tate; Richard M Walmsley; Frédéric Saad; Kris Van Dijck; Marlies De Boeck; Freddy Van Goethem; Magdalena Lukamowicz-Rajska; Azeddine Elhajouji; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Simultaneous evaluation of dexamethasone-induced apoptosis and micronuclei in rat primary spleen cell cultures.

Authors:  G Krishna; G Urda; W Tefera; N D Lalwani; J Theiss
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 8.  Cytochrome P450 pharmacogenetics and cancer.

Authors:  C Rodriguez-Antona; M Ingelman-Sundberg
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 9.867

9.  Preclinical evaluation of AMG 900, a novel potent and highly selective pan-aurora kinase inhibitor with activity in taxane-resistant tumor cell lines.

Authors:  Marc Payton; Tammy L Bush; Grace Chung; Beth Ziegler; Patrick Eden; Patricia McElroy; Sandra Ross; Victor J Cee; Holly L Deak; Brian L Hodous; Hanh Nho Nguyen; Philip R Olivieri; Karina Romero; Laurie B Schenkel; Annette Bak; Mary Stanton; Isabelle Dussault; Vinod F Patel; Stephanie Geuns-Meyer; Robert Radinsky; Richard L Kendall
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  ToxPi Graphical User Interface 2.0: Dynamic exploration, visualization, and sharing of integrated data models.

Authors:  Skylar W Marvel; Kimberly To; Fabian A Grimm; Fred A Wright; Ivan Rusyn; David M Reif
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.