Literature DB >> 10458230

Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer.

A V D'Amico1, R Whittington, S B Malkowicz, J Fondurulia, M H Chen, I Kaplan, C J Beard, J E Tomaszewski, A A Renshaw, A Wein, C N Coleman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present nomograms providing estimates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure-free survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) or external-beam radiation therapy (RT) for men diagnosed during the PSA era with clinically localized disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A Cox regression multivariable analysis was used to determine the prognostic significance of the pretreatment PSA level, 1992 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score in predicting the time to posttherapy PSA failure in 1,654 men with T1c,2 prostate cancer managed with either RP or RT.
RESULTS: Pretherapy PSA, AJCC clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason score were independent predictors (P < .0001) of time to posttherapy PSA failure in patients managed with either RP or RT. Two-year PSA failure rates derived from the Cox regression model and bootstrap estimates of the 95% confidence intervals are presented in the format of a nomogram stratified by the pretreatment PSA, AJCC clinical stage, biopsy Gleason score, and local treatment modality.
CONCLUSION: Men at high risk (> 50%) for early (< or = 2 years) PSA failure could be identified on the basis of the type of local therapy received and the clinical information obtained as part of the routine work-up for localized prostate cancer. Selection of these men for trials evaluating adjuvant systemic and improved local therapies may be justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10458230     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1999.17.1.168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  82 in total

1.  Predicting the clinical course of prostate cancer.

Authors:  James McKiernan; Mitchell C Benson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 14.808

2.  SEOM clinical guidelines for treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  José Ángel Arranz Arija; Javier Cassinello Espinosa; Miguel Ángel Climent Durán; Fernando Rivero Herrero
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Safety of selective nerve sparing in high risk prostate cancer during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Anup Kumar; Srinivas Samavedi; Anthony S Bates; Vladimir Mouraviev; Rafael F Coelho; Bernardo Rocco; Vipul R Patel
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-07-19

4.  Salvage prostatectomy post-definitive radiation therapy: The Vancouver experience.

Authors:  Niall M Corcoran; Guilherme Godoy; Rodney C Studd; Rowan G Casey; Antonio Hurtado-Coll; Scott Tyldesley; S Larry Goldenberg; Martin E Gleave
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

5.  Risk assessment for biochemical recurrence prior to radical prostatectomy: significant enhancement contributed by human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) and free prostate specific antigen (PSA) in men with moderate PSA-elevation in serum.

Authors:  Thomas Steuber; Andrew J Vickers; Alexander Haese; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Felix K-H Chun; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Hartwig Huland; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Advances in the Medical Treatment of Prostate Cancer, Bladder Cancer, Renal Cell Cancer, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Highlights from the XVIIth Congress of the European Association of Urology, Birmingham, UK, February 23-26, 2002.

Authors:  Christian Seitz; Mesut Remzi; Bob Djavan; Claus G Roehrborn
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

Review 7.  Optimal cost-effective staging evaluations in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gregory L Lacy; Douglas W Soderdahl; Javier Hernandez
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Prostate cancer that is within 0.1 mm of the surgical margin of a radical prostatectomy predicts greater likelihood of recurrence.

Authors:  Jason P Izard; Lawrence D True; Philip May; William J Ellis; Paul H Lange; Bruce Dalkin; Daniel W Lin; Rodney A Schmidt; Jonathan L Wright
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 9.  Critical review of prostate cancer predictive tools.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Michael W Kattan; Andrew J Vickers; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.404

10.  Development and Internal Validation of a Web-based Tool to Predict Sexual, Urinary, and Bowel Function Longitudinally After Radiation Therapy, Surgery, or Observation.

Authors:  Aaron A Laviana; Zhiguo Zhao; Li-Ching Huang; Tatsuki Koyama; Ralph Conwill; Karen Hoffman; Michael Goodman; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Lisa E Paddock; Antoinette Stroup; Matthew R Cooperberg; Mia Hashibe; Brock B O'Neil; Sherrie H Kaplan; Sheldon Greenfield; David F Penson; Daniel A Barocas
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.