Literature DB >> 29021319

The purging of deleterious mutations in simple and complex mating environments.

Julie Colpitts1, Darla Williscroft1, Harmandeep Singh Sekhon1, Howard D Rundle2.   

Abstract

There is a general expectation that sexual selection should align with natural selection to aid the purging of deleterious mutations, yet experiments comparing purging under monogamy versus polygamy have provided mixed results. Recent studies suggest that this may be because the simplified mating environments used in these studies reduce the benefit of sexual selection through males and hamper natural selection through females by increasing costs associated with sexual conflict. To test the effect of the physical mating environment on purging, we use experimental evolution in Drosophila melanogaster to track the frequency of four separate deleterious mutations in replicate populations that experience polygamy under either a simple or structurally complex mating arena while controlling for arena size. Consistent with past results suggesting a greater net benefit of polygamy in a complex environment, two of the mutations were purged significantly faster in this environment. The other two mutations showed no significant difference between environments.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; monogamy; polygamy; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29021319      PMCID: PMC5665778          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2017.0518

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  11 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of new alleles and the extinction of small populations: drift load, beneficial alleles, and sexual selection.

Authors:  M C Whitlock
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Devin Arbuthnott; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males.

Authors:  Michael C Whitlock; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Sexual selection against deleterious mutations via variable male search success.

Authors:  Kelsie Maclellan; Michael C Whitlock; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Genomic Evidence that Sexual Selection Impedes Adaptation to a Novel Environment.

Authors:  Stephen F Chenoweth; Nicholas C Appleton; Scott L Allen; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  GENETIC COVARIANCE OF FITNESS CORRELATES: WHAT GENETIC CORRELATIONS ARE MADE OF AND WHY IT MATTERS.

Authors:  David Houle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  The physical environment mediates male harm and its effect on selection in females.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Amardeep Singh; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  The purging of deleterious mutations in simple and complex mating environments.

Authors:  Julie Colpitts; Darla Williscroft; Harmandeep Singh Sekhon; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Environmental complexity and the purging of deleterious alleles.

Authors:  Amardeep Singh; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 10.  On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br Foreign Med Chir Rev       Date:  1860-04
View more
  4 in total

1.  Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Kevin E Kwok; Christopher S Angell; Howard D Rundle; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The effects of male harm vary with female quality and environmental complexity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alison MacPherson; Li Yun; Tania S Barrera; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  The purging of deleterious mutations in simple and complex mating environments.

Authors:  Julie Colpitts; Darla Williscroft; Harmandeep Singh Sekhon; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  No evidence of positive assortative mating for genetic quality in fruit flies.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.349

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.