Literature DB >> 30158138

The effects of male harm vary with female quality and environmental complexity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Alison MacPherson1, Li Yun1, Tania S Barrera1, Aneil F Agrawal2, Howard D Rundle3.   

Abstract

Mate competition provides the opportunity for sexual selection which often acts strongly on males, but also the opportunity for sexual conflict that can alter natural selection on females. Recent attention has focused on the potential of sexual conflict to weaken selection on females if male sexual attention, and hence harm, is disproportionately directed towards high- over low-quality females, thereby reducing the fitness difference between these females. However, sexual conflict could instead strengthen selection on females if low-quality females are more sensitive to male harm than high-quality females, thereby magnifying fitness differences between them. We quantify the effects of male exposure on low- versus high-quality females in Drosophila melanogaster in each of two environments ('simple' and 'complex') that are known to alter behavioural interactions. We show that the effects of male harm are greater for low- compared to high-quality females in the complex but not the simple environment, consistent with mate competition strengthening selection on females in the former but not in the latter environment.
© 2018 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  mate competition; natural selection; sexual conflict; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30158138      PMCID: PMC6127120          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2018.0443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  12 in total

1.  Sexual selection is ineffectual or inhibits the purging of deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Devin Arbuthnott; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Genomic Evidence that Sexual Selection Impedes Adaptation to a Novel Environment.

Authors:  Stephen F Chenoweth; Nicholas C Appleton; Scott L Allen; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  PERSPECTIVE: CHASE-AWAY SEXUAL SELECTION: ANTAGONISTIC SEDUCTION VERSUS RESISTANCE.

Authors:  Brett Holland; William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Kevin E Kwok; Christopher S Angell; Howard D Rundle; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The effects of male harm vary with female quality and environmental complexity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alison MacPherson; Li Yun; Tania S Barrera; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Variation in the strength of inbreeding depression across environments: effects of stress and density dependence.

Authors:  Li Yun; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  The physical environment mediates male harm and its effect on selection in females.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Amardeep Singh; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution.

Authors:  W R Rice
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The purging of deleterious mutations in simple and complex mating environments.

Authors:  Julie Colpitts; Darla Williscroft; Harmandeep Singh Sekhon; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.703

10.  Environmental complexity and the purging of deleterious alleles.

Authors:  Amardeep Singh; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  5 in total

1.  The effects of male harm vary with female quality and environmental complexity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alison MacPherson; Li Yun; Tania S Barrera; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Softness of selection and mating system interact to shape trait evolution under sexual conflict.

Authors:  Xiang-Yi Li Richter; Brian Hollis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 4.171

3.  Sexual selection, environmental robustness, and evolutionary demography of maladapted populations: A test using experimental evolution in seed beetles.

Authors:  Ivain Martinossi-Allibert; Emma Thilliez; Göran Arnqvist; David Berger
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 5.183

4.  Sexual conflict drives micro- and macroevolution of sexual dimorphism in immunity.

Authors:  Basabi Bagchi; Quentin Corbel; Imroze Khan; Ellen Payne; Devshuvam Banerji; Johanna Liljestrand-Rönn; Ivain Martinossi-Allibert; Julian Baur; Ahmed Sayadi; Elina Immonen; Göran Arnqvist; Irene Söderhäll; David Berger
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 7.431

5.  Sexual conflict in a changing environment.

Authors:  Agata Plesnar-Bielak; Aleksandra Łukasiewicz
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2021-05-07
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.