Literature DB >> 19625301

Sexual selection against deleterious mutations via variable male search success.

Kelsie Maclellan1, Michael C Whitlock, Howard D Rundle.   

Abstract

In many species, successful mating requires the initial step of actively searching for and locating a female. The overall health or condition of a male is likely to affect their ability to do this, making search effort a potentially important component of sexual fitness that may have important consequences for population mean fitness. We investigated the potential population genetic consequences of search effort using 10 populations of Drosophila melanogaster, each fixed for a different recessive mutation with a visible phenotypic effect. Mate choice trials were conducted in arenas of varying size, requiring different levels of search ability. Sexual selection against mutant males was stronger when increased search effort was included than when it was excluded. Varying abilities to find mates can substantially increase the strength of selection against deleterious alleles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19625301      PMCID: PMC2828002          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  8 in total

Review 1.  Fixation of new alleles and the extinction of small populations: drift load, beneficial alleles, and sexual selection.

Authors:  M C Whitlock
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction.

Authors:  A F Agrawal
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Sexual selection and the maintenance of sex.

Authors:  S Siller
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-06-07       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Selection on male size, leg length and condition during mate search in a sexually highly dimorphic orb-weaving spider.

Authors:  Matthias W Foellmer; Daphne J Fairbairn
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2004-12-24       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  What determines sex roles in mate searching?

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Bob B M Wong
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Sexual selection for male mobility in a giant insect with female-biased size dimorphism.

Authors:  Clint D Kelly; Luc F Bussière; Darryl T Gwynne
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 7.  Purging the genome with sexual selection: reducing mutation load through selection on males.

Authors:  Michael C Whitlock; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates.

Authors:  A H Harcourt; P H Harvey; S G Larson; R V Short
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1981-09-03       Impact factor: 49.962

  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Dietary stress does not strengthen selection against single deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  K MacLellan; L Kwan; M C Whitlock; H D Rundle
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Competition for mates and the improvement of nonsexual fitness.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Kevin E Kwok; Christopher S Angell; Howard D Rundle; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The physical environment mediates male harm and its effect on selection in females.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Amardeep Singh; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The purging of deleterious mutations in simple and complex mating environments.

Authors:  Julie Colpitts; Darla Williscroft; Harmandeep Singh Sekhon; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Remating in Drosophila melanogaster: are indirect benefits condition dependent?

Authors:  Tristan A F Long; Alison Pischedda; William R Rice
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Evolutionary consequences of altered atmospheric oxygen in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Marc Charette; Charles-A Darveau; Steve F Perry; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evolution of Caenorhabditis elegans host defense under selection by the bacterial parasite Serratia marcescens.

Authors:  McKenna J Penley; Giang T Ha; Levi T Morran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The cuticle inward barrier in Drosophila melanogaster is shaped by mitochondrial and nuclear genotypes and a sex-specific effect of diet.

Authors:  Wei Dong; Ralph Dobler; Damian K Dowling; Bernard Moussian
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Effects of Temperature on Lifespan of Drosophila melanogaster from Different Genetic Backgrounds: Links between Metabolic Rate and Longevity.

Authors:  Mateusz Mołoń; Jan Dampc; Monika Kula-Maximenko; Jacek Zebrowski; Agnieszka Mołoń; Ralph Dobler; Roma Durak; Andrzej Skoczowski
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.769

10.  Divergent natural selection alters male sperm competition success in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Ralph Dobler; Marc Charette; Katrin Kaplan; Biz R Turnell; Klaus Reinhardt
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 2.912

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.