Literature DB >> 28568816

GENETIC COVARIANCE OF FITNESS CORRELATES: WHAT GENETIC CORRELATIONS ARE MADE OF AND WHY IT MATTERS.

David Houle1,2.   

Abstract

The genetic variance-covariance matrix, G, is determined in part by functional architecture, the pathways by which variation in genotype influences phenotype. I develop a simple architectural model for G for two traits under directional selection constrained by their dependence on a common limiting resource. I assume that genetic variance is maintained by mutation-selection balance. The relative numbers of loci that play a role in acquiring versus allocating a limiting resource play a crucial role in determining genetic covariance. If many loci are involved in acquiring a resource, genetic covariance may be either negative or positive at equilibrium, depending on the fitness function and the input of mutational variance. The form of G does not necessarily reveal the constraint on resource acquisition inherent in the system, and therefore studies estimating G do not test for the existence of life-history tradeoffs. Characters may evolve in patterns that are unpredictable from G. Experiments are suggested that would indicate if this model could explain observations of positive genetic covariance. © 1991 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Evolutionary constraint; life history; quantitative genetics

Year:  1991        PMID: 28568816     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1991.tb04334.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  38 in total

Review 1.  Finding the way in phenotypic space: the origin and maintenance of constraints on organismal form.

Authors:  Massimo Pigliucci
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  Quantitative trait loci affecting phenotypic plasticity and the allometric relationship of ovariole number and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Alan O Bergland; Anne Genissel; Sergey V Nuzhdin; Marc Tatar
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-20       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  Quantitative genetics approaches to study evolutionary processes in ecotoxicology; a perspective from research on the evolution of resistance.

Authors:  Paul L Klerks; Lingtian Xie; Jeffrey S Levinton
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 2.823

4.  A genomic perspective on the generation and maintenance of genetic diversity in herbivorous insects.

Authors:  Andrew D Gloss; Simon C Groen; Noah K Whiteman
Journal:  Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 13.915

5.  Genetic correlation between the ages of menarche and menopause.

Authors:  J S Peccei
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2000-03

Review 6.  Developmental Bias and Evolution: A Regulatory Network Perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Uller; Armin P Moczek; Richard A Watson; Paul M Brakefield; Kevin N Laland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 7.  Developmental constraints on behavioural flexibility.

Authors:  Kay E Holekamp; Eli M Swanson; Page E Van Meter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Heterotrophic eukaryotes show a slow-fast continuum, not a gleaner-exploiter trade-off.

Authors:  Thomas Kiørboe; Mridul K Thomas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The devil in the details of life-history evolution: instability and reversal of genetic correlations during selection on Drosophila development.

Authors:  Adam K Chippindale; Anh L Ngo; Michael R Rose
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.166

10.  Contemporary parallel diversification, antipredator adaptations and phenotypic integration in an aquatic isopod.

Authors:  Fabrice Eroukhmanoff; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.