Literature DB >> 31575372

No evidence of positive assortative mating for genetic quality in fruit flies.

Nathaniel P Sharp1,2, Michael C Whitlock1.   

Abstract

In sexual populations, the effectiveness of selection will depend on how gametes combine with respect to genetic quality. If gametes with deleterious alleles are likely to combine with one another, deleterious genetic variation can be more easily purged by selection. Assortative mating, where there is a positive correlation between parents in a phenotype of interest such as body size, is often observed in nature, but does not necessarily reveal how gametes ultimately combine with respect to genetic quality itself. We manipulated genetic quality in fruit fly populations using an inbreeding scheme designed to provide an unbiased measure of mating patterns. While inbred flies had substantially reduced reproductive success, their gametes did not combine with those of other inbred flies more often than expected by chance, indicating a lack of positive assortative mating. Instead, we detected a negative correlation in genetic quality between parents, i.e. disassortative mating, which diminished with age. This pattern is expected to reduce the genetic variance for fitness, diminishing the effectiveness of selection. We discuss how mechanisms of sexual selection could produce a pattern of disassortative mating. Our study highlights that sexual selection has the potential to either increase or decrease genetic load.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; disassortative mating; genetic quality; inbreeding depression; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31575372      PMCID: PMC6790784          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  27 in total

Review 1.  Sperm competition and ejaculate economics.

Authors:  Geoff A Parker; Tommaso Pizzari
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2010-11

2.  Variation in male effects on female fecundity in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  H M Tennant; E E Sonser; T A F Long
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 2.411

Review 3.  The genetics of inbreeding depression.

Authors:  Deborah Charlesworth; John H Willis
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Complex interactions between paternal and maternal effects: parental experience and age at reproduction affect fecundity and offspring performance in a butterfly.

Authors:  Simon Ducatez; M Baguette; V M Stevens; D Legrand; H Fréville
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Strong sexual selection in males against a mutation load that reduces offspring production in seed beetles.

Authors:  K Grieshop; J Stångberg; I Martinossi-Allibert; G Arnqvist; D Berger
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  The physical environment mediates male harm and its effect on selection in females.

Authors:  Li Yun; Patrick J Chen; Amardeep Singh; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  The purging of deleterious mutations in simple and complex mating environments.

Authors:  Julie Colpitts; Darla Williscroft; Harmandeep Singh Sekhon; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Environmental complexity and the purging of deleterious alleles.

Authors:  Amardeep Singh; Aneil F Agrawal; Howard D Rundle
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  The seminal symphony: how to compose an ejaculate.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Laura Sirot; Stuart Wigby
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Relative effectiveness of mating success and sperm competition at eliminating deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sean C A Clark; Nathaniel P Sharp; Locke Rowe; Aneil F Agrawal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  No evidence of positive assortative mating for genetic quality in fruit flies.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Sharp; Michael C Whitlock
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.349

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.