Literature DB >> 2900977

Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.

U Waldenström1, O Axelsson, S Nilsson, G Eklund, O Fall, S Lindeberg, Y Sjödin.   

Abstract

4997 of 7354 pregnant women had no clinical indication for an elective ultrasound examination at 12 weeks' gestation. 2482 of these women were randomly selected for ultrasound screening at 15 weeks and the remainder received the same standard antenatal care without the scan. Labour was less often induced among screened women both for all reasons (5.9% vs 9.1%, p less than 0.0001) and for suspected post-term pregnancy (1.7% vs 3.7%, p less than 0.0001). Earlier detection of twins had no effect on neonatal outcome. Among babies born to screened women, fewer were of birthweight less than 2500 g (59 vs 95, p = 0.005) and mean birthweight was 42 g higher (p 0.008). For babies born to screened women who smoked it was 75 g higher (p 0.012) and for those of non-smokers 26 g (not significant). The reason for the differences in mean birthweight could be that screened women reduced smoking in response to watching their fetus on the scan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2900977     DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)90636-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  16 in total

Review 1.  Foetal images: the power of visual technology in antenatal care and the implications for women's reproductive freedom.

Authors:  I Zechmeister
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Periodic health examination, 1992 update: 2. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Ultrasonography and perinatal mortality rates.

Authors:  D J Cahill
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-16

4.  Ultrasonic imaging: safety considerations.

Authors:  Gail Ter Haar
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.906

5.  Does the Use of Diagnostic Technology Reduce Fetal Mortality?

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Irene Skau; Rune Sørensen; Anne Eskild
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 6.  Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Leanne Bricker; James P Neilson; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-04-14

Review 7.  Fetal ultrasonography.

Authors:  S H Garmel; M E D'Alton
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1993-09

8.  Difference in Perception of Pregnancy Risk in Two Maternal Age Groups.

Authors:  Ziba Taghizadeh; Mohammad Ali Cheraghi; Anoshirvan Kazemnejad; Jalal Pooralajal; Soodabeh Aghababaei
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-05-01

9.  Routine ultrasonography in utero and subsequent handedness and neurological development.

Authors:  K A Salvesen; L J Vatten; S H Eik-Nes; K Hugdahl; L S Bakketeig
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-07-17

10.  Case-control study of prenatal ultrasonography exposure in children with delayed speech.

Authors:  J D Campbell; R W Elford; R F Brant
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.