Literature DB >> 22866238

Ultrasonic imaging: safety considerations.

Gail Ter Haar1.   

Abstract

Modern ultrasound imaging for diagnostic purposes has a wide range of applications. It is used in obstetrics to monitor the progress of pregnancy, in oncology to visualize tumours and their response to treatment, and, in cardiology, contrast-enhanced studies are used to investigate heart function and physiology. An increasing use of diagnostic ultrasound is to provide the first photograph for baby's album-in the form of a souvenir or keepsake scan that might be taken as part of a routine investigation, or during a visit to an independent high-street 'boutique'. It is therefore important to ensure that any benefit accrued from these applications outweighs any accompanying risk, and to evaluate the existing ultrasound bio-effect and epidemiology literature with this in mind. This review considers the existing laboratory and epidemiological evidence about the safety of diagnostic ultrasound and puts it in the context of current clinical usage.

Entities:  

Keywords:  diagnostic ultrasound; epidemiology; safety; thermal effects

Year:  2011        PMID: 22866238      PMCID: PMC3262273          DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2011.0029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interface Focus        ISSN: 2042-8898            Impact factor:   3.906


  87 in total

1.  Lung damage from exposure to pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  S Z Child; C L Hartman; L A Schery; E L Carstensen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Thresholds for ultrasonically induced lung hemorrhage in neonatal swine.

Authors:  R Baggs; D P Penney; C Cox; S Z Child; C H Raeman; D Dalecki; E L Carstensen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 3.  Biological consequences of hyperthermia.

Authors:  M W Miller; M C Ziskin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Routine ultrasound screening in pregnancy and the children's subsequent handedness.

Authors:  H Kieler; O Axelsson; B Haglund; S Nilsson; K A Salvesen
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  1998-01-09       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  A survey of the acoustic outputs of diagnostic ultrasound equipment in current clinical use.

Authors:  J Henderson; K Willson; J R Jago; T A Whittingham
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Effects of frequent ultrasound during pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  J P Newnham; S F Evans; C A Michael; F J Stanley; L I Landau
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-10-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Diagnostic ultrasound induces change within numbers of cryptal mitotic and apoptotic cells in small intestine.

Authors:  M T Stanton; R Ettarh; D Arango; M Tonra; P C Brennan
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2001-02-16       Impact factor: 5.037

8.  Prenatal exposure to ultrasound waves impacts neuronal migration in mice.

Authors:  Eugenius S B C Ang; Vicko Gluncic; Alvaro Duque; Mark E Schafer; Pasko Rakic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Lung lesions induced by continuous- and pulsed-wave (diagnostic) ultrasound in mice, rabbits, and pigs.

Authors:  J F Zachary; W D O'Brien
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 2.221

10.  Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial.

Authors:  A Saari-Kemppainen; O Karjalainen; P Ylöstalo; O P Heinonen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-08-18       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  18 in total

Review 1.  Bubbles with shock waves and ultrasound: a review.

Authors:  Siew-Wan Ohl; Evert Klaseboer; Boo Cheong Khoo
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Multi-Focus Beamforming for Thermal Strain Imaging Using a Single Ultrasound Linear Array Transducer.

Authors:  Man M Nguyen; Xuan Ding; Steven A Leers; Kang Kim
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  What do cardiologists know about the safety indexes of echocardiography?

Authors:  Yavuzer Koza
Journal:  J Echocardiogr       Date:  2014-07-16

4.  Acousto-optic interaction strengths in optically scattering media using high pressure acoustic pulses.

Authors:  David Hill; Alexander Bengtsson; Tobias Erlöv; Magnus Cinthio; Stefan Kröll
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Characterization and modeling of acousto-optic signal strengths in highly scattering media.

Authors:  Alexander Bengtsson; David Hill; Meng Li; Mengqiao Di; Magnus Cinthio; Tobias Erlöv; Stefan Andersson-Engels; Nina Reistad; Andreas Walther; Lars Rippe; Stefan Kröll
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Ultrasound-induced microbubble cavitation via a transcanal or transcranial approach facilitates inner ear drug delivery.

Authors:  Ai-Ho Liao; Chih-Hung Wang; Ping-Yu Weng; Yi-Chun Lin; Hao Wang; Hang-Kang Chen; Hao-Li Liu; Ho-Chiao Chuang; Cheng-Ping Shih
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-02-13

Review 7.  The Lancet Commission on diagnostics: transforming access to diagnostics.

Authors:  Kenneth A Fleming; Susan Horton; Michael L Wilson; Rifat Atun; Kristen DeStigter; John Flanigan; Shahin Sayed; Pierrick Adam; Bertha Aguilar; Savvas Andronikou; Catharina Boehme; William Cherniak; Annie Ny Cheung; Bernice Dahn; Lluis Donoso-Bach; Tania Douglas; Patricia Garcia; Sarwat Hussain; Hari S Iyer; Mikashmi Kohli; Alain B Labrique; Lai-Meng Looi; John G Meara; John Nkengasong; Madhukar Pai; Kara-Lee Pool; Kaushik Ramaiya; Lee Schroeder; Devanshi Shah; Richard Sullivan; Bien-Soo Tan; Kamini Walia
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Experimental acoustic characterization of an endoskeletal antibubble contrast agent: First results.

Authors:  Anastasiia Panfilova; Peiran Chen; Ruud J G van Sloun; Hessel Wijkstra; Michiel Postema; Albert T Poortinga; Massimo Mischi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 4.506

9.  Mice exposed to diagnostic ultrasound in utero are less social and more active in social situations relative to controls.

Authors:  Abbi M McClintic; Bryan H King; Sara J Webb; Pierre D Mourad
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 5.216

10.  Non-invasive Assessment of Liver Fat in ob/ob Mice Using Ultrasound-Induced Thermal Strain Imaging and Its Correlation with Hepatic Triglyceride Content.

Authors:  Waqas B Khalid; Nadim Farhat; Linda Lavery; Josh Jarnagin; James P Delany; Kang Kim
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 2.998

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.