Literature DB >> 8221427

Case-control study of prenatal ultrasonography exposure in children with delayed speech.

J D Campbell1, R W Elford, R F Brant.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there is an association between prenatal ultrasound exposure and delayed speech in children.
DESIGN: Case-control study.
SETTING: Network of community physicians affiliated with the Primary Care Research Unit, University of Calgary.
SUBJECTS: Thirty-four practitioners identified 72 children aged 24 to 100 months who had undergone a formal speech-language evaluation and were found to have delayed speech of unknown cause by a speech-language pathologist. For each case subject the practitioners found two control subjects matched for sex, date of birth, sibling birth order and associated health problems. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of prenatal ultrasound exposure and delayed speech.
RESULTS: The children with delayed speech had a higher rate of ultrasound exposure than the control subjects. The findings suggest that a child with delayed speech is about twice as likely as a child without delayed speech to have been exposed to prenatal ultrasound waves (odds ratio 2.8, 95% confidence limit 1.5 to 5.3; p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: An association between prenatal ultrasonography exposure and delayed speech was found. If there is no obvious clinical indication for diagnostic in-utero ultrasonography, physicians might be wise to caution their patients about the vulnerability of the fetus to noxious agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8221427      PMCID: PMC1485930     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  19 in total

1.  Efficiency of case-control studies with multiple controls per case: continuous or dichotomous data.

Authors:  H K Ury
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Doppler ultrasound and fetal activity.

Authors:  H David; J B Weaver; J F Pearson
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1975-04-12

3.  Bias in analytic research.

Authors:  D L Sackett
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1979

4.  Safety of diagnostic ultrasound in obstetrics.

Authors:  L M Hellman; G M Duffus; I Donald; B Sundén
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1970-05-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  When are speech sounds learned?

Authors:  E K Sander
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1972-02

6.  Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  U Waldenström; O Axelsson; S Nilsson; G Eklund; O Fall; S Lindeberg; Y Sjödin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-09-10       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Biological effects of ultrasound.

Authors:  M E Stratmeyer; C L Christman
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  1982 Fall-Winter

8.  Continuous ultrasound and fetal movement.

Authors:  R H Hertz; I Timor-Tritsch; L J Dierker; L Chik; M G Rosen
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  One-year follow-up of infants exposed to ultrasound in utero.

Authors:  P C Scheidt; F Stanley; D A Bryla
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1978-08-01       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Evaluation of the bioeffects of prenatal ultrasound exposure in the cynomolgus macaque (Macaca fascicularis): I. Neonatal/infant observations.

Authors:  A F Tarantal; A G Hendrickx
Journal:  Teratology       Date:  1989-02
View more
  9 in total

1.  Proliferation of prenatal ultrasonography.

Authors:  John J You; David A Alter; Therese A Stukel; Sarah D McDonald; Andreas Laupacis; Ying Liu; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Antenatal ultrasound and risk of autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Judith K Grether; Sherian Xu Li; Cathleen K Yoshida; Lisa A Croen
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2009-09-01

3.  Ultrasonic imaging: safety considerations.

Authors:  Gail Ter Haar
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 3.906

4.  Severity of ASD symptoms and their correlation with the presence of copy number variations and exposure to first trimester ultrasound.

Authors:  Sara Jane Webb; Michelle M Garrison; Raphael Bernier; Abbi M McClintic; Bryan H King; Pierre D Mourad
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 5.216

5.  Prenatal exposure to ultrasound waves impacts neuronal migration in mice.

Authors:  Eugenius S B C Ang; Vicko Gluncic; Alvaro Duque; Mark E Schafer; Pasko Rakic
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-08-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Prenatal imaging: ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy; Roy A Filly; Joshua A Copel
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Knowledge and attitudes of ultrasonography physicians regarding the biological effects of ultrasound in French-speaking sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Kokou Adambounou; Komlan Amoussou; Alexis Agbodjan; Amégninou Mawuko Yao Adigo; Lantam Sonhaye; Victor Adjenou
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2021-06-16

8.  Prenatal ultrasound exposure and association with postnatal hearing outcomes.

Authors:  Claude F Harbarger; Paul M Weinberger; Jack C Borders; Charles A Hughes
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-01-31

Review 9.  Possible Effects on Health of Ultrasound Exposure, Risk Factors in the Work Environment and Occupational Safety Review.

Authors:  David Baeza Moyano; Daniel Arranz Paraiso; Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.