Literature DB >> 1521208

Periodic health examination, 1992 update: 2. Routine prenatal ultrasound screening. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination.

.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1992        PMID： 1521208      PMCID： PMC1336384     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN： 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


× No keyword cloud information.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound in pregnancy. Consensus statement, 1986. Norwegian Institute of Hospital Research.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  A randomized trial of routine prenatal ultrasound.

Authors:  B Ewigman; M LeFevre; J Hesser
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  In utero exposure to diagnostic ultrasound: a 6-year follow-up.

Authors:  E A Lyons; C Dyke; M Toms; M Cheang
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Randomised controlled trial of ultrasonographic screening in pregnancy.

Authors:  L S Bakketeig; S H Eik-Nes; G Jacobsen; M K Ulstein; C J Brodtkorb; P Balstad; B C Eriksen; N P Jörgensen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-07-28       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  S H Eik-Nes; O Okland; J C Aure; M Ulstein
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-16       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  U Waldenström; O Axelsson; S Nilsson; G Eklund; O Fall; S Lindeberg; Y Sjödin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-09-10       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Screening for small for dates fetuses: a controlled trial.

Authors:  J P Neilson; S P Munjanja; C R Whitfield
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-11-03

8.  Predictive value of ultrasound measurement in early pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  M J Bennett; G Little; J Dewhurst; G Chamberlain
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1982-05

9.  What do patients value? Willingness to pay for ultrasound in normal pregnancy.

Authors:  D M Berwick; M C Weinstein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial.

Authors:  A Saari-Kemppainen; O Karjalainen; P Ylöstalo; O P Heinonen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-08-18       Impact factor: 79.321
View more
  2 in total

1.  Hyperechogenic fetal bowel: an ultrasonographic marker for adverse fetal and neonatal outcome?

Authors:  Maria Antonietta De Oronzo
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2011-01

2.  Proliferation of prenatal ultrasonography.

Authors:  John J You; David A Alter; Therese A Stukel; Sarah D McDonald; Andreas Laupacis; Ying Liu; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 8.262
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.