Literature DB >> 29349772

Does the Use of Diagnostic Technology Reduce Fetal Mortality?

Jostein Grytten1,2, Irene Skau1, Rune Sørensen3, Anne Eskild2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect that the introduction of new diagnostic technology in obstetric care has had on fetal death. DATA SOURCE: The Medical Birth Registry of Norway provided detailed medical information for approximately 1.2 million deliveries from 1967 to 1995. Information about diagnostic technology was collected directly from the maternity units, using a questionnaire. STUDY
DESIGN: The data were analyzed using a hospital fixed-effects regression with fetal mortality as the outcome measure. The key independent variables were the introduction of ultrasound and electronic fetal monitoring at each maternity ward. Hospital-specific trends and risk factors of the mother were included as control variables. The richness of the data allowed us to perform several robustness tests. PRINCIPAL FINDING: The introduction of ultrasound caused a significant drop in fetal mortality rate, while the introduction of electronic fetal monitoring had no effect on the rate. In the population as a whole, ultrasound contributed to a reduction in fetal deaths of nearly 20 percent. For post-term deliveries, the reduction was well over 50 percent.
CONCLUSION: The introduction of ultrasound made a major contribution to the decline in fetal mortality at the end of the last century. © Health Research and Educational Trust.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Obstetrics/Gynecology; econometrics; maternal and perinatal care and outcomes; technology adoption/diffusion/use

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29349772      PMCID: PMC6232411          DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  52 in total

1.  Association between stillbirth and risk factors known at pregnancy confirmation.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination.

Authors:  David A Savitz; James W Terry; Nancy Dole; John M Thorp; Anna Maria Siega-Riz; Amy H Herring
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Reducing stillbirths: screening and monitoring during pregnancy and labour.

Authors:  Rachel A Haws; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Tanya Soomro; Esme V Menezes; Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Sensitivity of routine ultrasound screening of pregnancies in the Eurofetus database. The Eurofetus Team.

Authors:  H Grandjean; D Larroque; S Levi
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-06-18       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 5.  Five-decade international trends in the relation of perinatal mortality and congenital malformations: stillbirth and neonatal death compared.

Authors:  H Kalter
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.196

6.  A prospective comparison of selective and universal electronic fetal monitoring in 34,995 pregnancies.

Authors:  K J Leveno; F G Cunningham; S Nelson; M Roark; M L Williams; D Guzick; S Dowling; C R Rosenfeld; A Buckley
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Stillbirth.

Authors:  Gordon C S Smith; Ruth C Fretts
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update.

Authors:  S B Thacker; D F Stroup; H B Peterson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Ultrasound screening and perinatal mortality: controlled trial of systematic one-stage screening in pregnancy. The Helsinki Ultrasound Trial.

Authors:  A Saari-Kemppainen; O Karjalainen; P Ylöstalo; O P Heinonen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-08-18       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Detection of chromosomal abnormalities, an outcome of ultrasound screening. The Eurofetus Team.

Authors:  H Grandjean; D Larroque; S Levi
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1998-06-18       Impact factor: 5.691

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Does the use of diagnostic technology reduce fetal mortality?

Authors:  Haywood L Brown
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Temporal changes in fetal death risk in pregnancies with preeclampsia: Does offspring birthweight matter? A population study.

Authors:  Camilla Haavaldsen; Ellen Marie Strøm-Roum; Anne Eskild
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X       Date:  2019-02-14

3.  Routine induction in late-term pregnancies: follow-up of a Danish induction of labour paradigm.

Authors:  Eva Rydahl; Eugene Declercq; Mette Juhl; Rikke Damkjær Maimburg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Does the use of Doppler ultrasound reduce fetal mortality? A population study of all deliveries in Norway 1990-2014.

Authors:  Jostein Grytten; Irene Skau; Anne Eskild
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 7.196

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.