Literature DB >> 28658853

Difference in Perception of Pregnancy Risk in Two Maternal Age Groups.

Ziba Taghizadeh1, Mohammad Ali Cheraghi2, Anoshirvan Kazemnejad3, Jalal Pooralajal4, Soodabeh Aghababaei5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Various health risks and complications may happen during pregnancy for both the mother and her child. Women should be informed of the risk associated with their pregnancy. AIM: To compare the differences of perception of pregnancy risk of two maternal age groups of healthy nulliparous women.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In an analytical, descriptive cross-sectional study, 240 nulliparous pregnant women (160 women aged 18 to 35 years as a normal age group and 80 women < 18 years as a high risk age group) were randomly selected. Women were asked to complete questionnaire which included sociodemographic characteristics, pregnancy history, perception of pregnancy risk and pregnancy related anxiety.
RESULTS: Overall, women of < 18 years (high-risk group) perceived the risks of pregnancy higher than those of 18-35 years age women (reference group). Women in high-risk group rated their risks for herself, having haemorrhaging, having a cesarean birth and dying during pregnancy to be significantly higher than reference group. There was a statistically significant relationship between maternal age and perception of pregnancy risk (p<0.003). There was also a statistically significant relationship between pregnancy related anxiety and perception of pregnancy risk (p<0.002).
CONCLUSION: Women's perception of pregnancy risk is different in various maternal age groups. Maternal age can be considered as one of the important factors affecting perception of pregnancy risk. By routine screening of perception of pregnancy risk during prenatal care more effective risk consulting model could be designed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adolescent pregnancy; High-risk pregnancy; Risk Perception

Year:  2017        PMID: 28658853      PMCID: PMC5483755          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23661.9915

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  30 in total

1.  Cesarean delivery rates in adolescent pregnancy.

Authors:  S Zeteroglu; I Sahin; K Gol
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Effects of routine one-stage ultrasound screening in pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  U Waldenström; O Axelsson; S Nilsson; G Eklund; O Fall; S Lindeberg; Y Sjödin
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-09-10       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Association between maternal age and pregnancy outcome: implications for the Pakistani society.

Authors:  Hafsa Muhammad Hanif
Journal:  J Pak Med Assoc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 0.781

4.  Are teenage pregnancies at high risk? A comparison study in a developing country.

Authors:  Haritha Sagili; N Pramya; Karthiga Prabhu; Mariano Mascarenhas; P Reddi Rani
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2011-07-26       Impact factor: 2.344

5.  Adolescent pregnancy outcomes and risk factors in Malaysia.

Authors:  Khairani Omar; Suriati Hasim; Noor Azimah Muhammad; Aida Jaffar; Syahnaz Mohd Hashim; Harlina Halizah Siraj
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2010-08-30       Impact factor: 3.561

6.  First mothering over 35 years: questioning the association of maternal age and pregnancy risk.

Authors:  M Carolan; S Nelson
Journal:  Health Care Women Int       Date:  2007-07

7.  Hospital-based perinatal outcomes and complications in teenage pregnancy in India.

Authors:  Prianka Mukhopadhyay; R N Chaudhuri; Bhaskar Paul
Journal:  J Health Popul Nutr       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Experiences of fears associated with pregnancy and childbirth: a study of 329 pregnant women.

Authors:  Hanna-Leena Melender
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.689

9.  Adjunct prenatal testing: patient decisions regarding ethnic carrier screening and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  Erica L Sturm; Kelly E Ormond
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  Advanced maternal age and risk perception: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Hamideh Bayrampour; Maureen Heaman; Karen A Duncan; Suzanne Tough
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 3.007

View more
  2 in total

1.  Socio-demographic factors related to parent engagement in the NICU and the impact of the SENSE program.

Authors:  Laura Whitehill; Joan Smith; Graham Colditz; Tiffany Le; Polly Kellner; Roberta Pineda
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Perceived risk and protective behaviors regarding COVID-19 among Iranian pregnant women.

Authors:  Soodabeh Aghababaei; Saeed Bashirian; Alireza Soltanian; Mansoureh Refaei; Tahereh Omidi; Samereh Ghelichkhani; Farzaneh Soltani
Journal:  Middle East Fertil Soc J       Date:  2020-09-18
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.