Literature DB >> 28993267

On selecting a minimal set of in vitro assays to reliably determine estrogen agonist activity.

Richard S Judson1, Keith A Houck2, Eric D Watt2, Russell S Thomas2.   

Abstract

The US EPA is charged with screening chemicals for their ability to be endocrine disruptors through interaction with the estrogen, androgen and thyroid axes. The agency is exploring the use of high-throughput in vitro assays to use in the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP), potentially as replacements for lower-throughput in vitro and in vivo tests. The first replacement is an integrated computational and experimental model for estrogen receptor (ER) activity, to be used as an alternative to the EDSP Tier 1 in vitro ER binding and transactivation assays and the in vivo uterotrophic bioassay. The ER agonist model uses a set of 16 in vitro assays that incorporate multiple technologies and cell lines and probe multiple points in the ER pathway. Here, we demonstrate that subsets of assays with as few as 4 assays can predict the activity of all 1811 chemicals tested with accuracy equivalent to that of the full 16-assay model. The prediction accuracy against reference chemicals is higher than that of the full chemical set, partly because the larger set contains many chemicals that can cause a variety of types of assay interference There are multiple accurate assay subsets, allowing flexibility in the construction of a multiplexed assay battery. We also discuss the issue of challenging chemicals, i.e. those that can give false positive results in certain assays, and could hence be more problematic when only a few assays are used. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative testing methods; Endocrine disruption; Estrogen receptor; In vitro

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28993267      PMCID: PMC5796525          DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.09.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  10 in total

1.  Integrated Model of Chemical Perturbations of a Biological Pathway Using 18 In Vitro High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Estrogen Receptor.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Felicia Maria Magpantay; Vijay Chickarmane; Cymra Haskell; Nessy Tania; Jean Taylor; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Daniel M Rotroff; Dayne L Filer; Keith A Houck; Matthew T Martin; Nisha Sipes; Ann M Richard; Kamel Mansouri; R Woodrow Setzer; Thomas B Knudsen; Kevin M Crofton; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  A modular approach to the ECVAM principles on test validity.

Authors:  Thomas Hartung; Susanne Bremer; Silvia Casati; Sandra Coecke; Raffaella Corvi; Salvador Fortaner; Laura Gribaldo; Marlies Halder; Sebastian Hoffmann; Annett Janusch Roi; Pilar Prieto; Enrico Sabbioni; Laurie Scott; Andrew Worth; Valérie Zuang
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.303

3.  New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays.

Authors:  Jonathan B Baell; Georgina A Holloway
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Screening Chemicals for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity Using a Computational Model.

Authors:  Patience Browne; Richard S Judson; Warren M Casey; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Development of a recombinant human ovarian (BG1) cell line containing estrogen receptor α and β for improved detection of estrogenic/antiestrogenic chemicals.

Authors:  Jennifer C Brennan; Arzoo Bassal; Guochun He; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Rules for identifying potentially reactive or promiscuous compounds.

Authors:  Robert F Bruns; Ian A Watson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 7.446

7.  Perspectives on validation of high-throughput assays supporting 21st century toxicity testing.

Authors:  Richard Judson; Robert Kavlock; Matthew Martin; David Reif; Keith Houck; Thomas Knudsen; Ann Richard; Raymond R Tice; Maurice Whelan; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Christopher Austin; George Daston; Thomas Hartung; John R Fowle; William Wooge; Weida Tong; David Dix
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.043

8.  Editor's Highlight: Analysis of the Effects of Cell Stress and Cytotoxicity on In Vitro Assay Activity Across a Diverse Chemical and Assay Space.

Authors:  Richard Judson; Keith Houck; Matt Martin; Ann M Richard; Thomas B Knudsen; Imran Shah; Stephen Little; John Wambaugh; R Woodrow Setzer; Parth Kothiya; Jimmy Phuong; Dayne Filer; Doris Smith; David Reif; Daniel Rotroff; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Nisha Sipes; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Kevin Crofton; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 9.  A Curated Database of Rodent Uterotrophic Bioactivity.

Authors:  Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Patricia C Ceger; David G Allen; Judy Strickland; Xiaoqing Chang; Jonathan T Hamm; Warren M Casey
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  Environmental and dietary estrogens and human health: is there a problem?

Authors:  S H Safe
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 9.031

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Identifying Compounds with Genotoxicity Potential Using Tox21 High-Throughput Screening Assays.

Authors:  Jui-Hua Hsieh; Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Ruili Huang; Alexander Sedykh; Keith R Shockley; Scott S Auerbach; B Alex Merrick; Menghang Xia; Raymond R Tice; Kristine L Witt
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Machine Learning Models for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity and Endocrine Disruption Prediction.

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Daniel P Russo; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Single-Cell Distribution Analysis of AR Levels by High-Throughput Microscopy in Cell Models: Application for Testing Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals.

Authors:  Fabio Stossi; Ragini M Mistry; Pankaj K Singh; Hannah L Johnson; Maureen G Mancini; Adam T Szafran; Michael A Mancini
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.341

4.  The EU-ToxRisk method documentation, data processing and chemical testing pipeline for the regulatory use of new approach methods.

Authors:  Alice Krebs; Barbara M A van Vugt-Lussenburg; Tanja Waldmann; Wiebke Albrecht; Jan Boei; Bas Ter Braak; Maja Brajnik; Thomas Braunbeck; Tim Brecklinghaus; Francois Busquet; Andras Dinnyes; Joh Dokler; Xenia Dolde; Thomas E Exner; Ciarán Fisher; David Fluri; Anna Forsby; Jan G Hengstler; Anna-Katharina Holzer; Zofia Janstova; Paul Jennings; Jaffar Kisitu; Julianna Kobolak; Manoj Kumar; Alice Limonciel; Jessica Lundqvist; Balázs Mihalik; Wolfgang Moritz; Giorgia Pallocca; Andrea Paola Cediel Ulloa; Manuel Pastor; Costanza Rovida; Ugis Sarkans; Johannes P Schimming; Bela Z Schmidt; Regina Stöber; Tobias Strassfeld; Bob van de Water; Anja Wilmes; Bart van der Burg; Catherine M Verfaillie; Rebecca von Hellfeld; Harry Vrieling; Nanette G Vrijenhoek; Marcel Leist
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 5.153

Review 5.  Building and Applying Quantitative Adverse Outcome Pathway Models for Chemical Hazard and Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Edward J Perkins; Roman Ashauer; Lyle Burgoon; Rory Conolly; Brigitte Landesmann; Cameron Mackay; Cheryl A Murphy; Nathan Pollesch; James R Wheeler; Anze Zupanic; Stefan Scholz
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  A general dose-response relationship for chronic chemical and other health stressors and mixtures based on an emergent illness severity model.

Authors:  James D Englehardt; Weihsueh A Chiu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Evaluating Chemicals for Thyroid Disruption: Opportunities and Challenges with in Vitro Testing and Adverse Outcome Pathway Approaches.

Authors:  Pamela D Noyes; Katie Paul Friedman; Patience Browne; Jonathan T Haselman; Mary E Gilbert; Michael W Hornung; Stan Barone; Kevin M Crofton; Susan C Laws; Tammy E Stoker; Steven O Simmons; Joseph E Tietge; Sigmund J Degitz
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 8.  Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals' (EDCs) Effects on Tumour Microenvironment and Cancer Progression: Emerging Contribution of RACK1.

Authors:  Erica Buoso; Mirco Masi; Marco Racchi; Emanuela Corsini
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Quality Control for Single Cell Imaging Analytics Using Endocrine Disruptor-Induced Changes in Estrogen Receptor Expression.

Authors:  Fabio Stossi; Pankaj K Singh; Ragini M Mistry; Hannah L Johnson; Radhika D Dandekar; Maureen G Mancini; Adam T Szafran; Arvind U Rao; Michael A Mancini
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Development of a prioritization method for chemical-mediated effects on steroidogenesis using an integrated statistical analysis of high-throughput H295R data.

Authors:  Derik E Haggard; R Woodrow Setzer; Richard S Judson; Katie Paul Friedman
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.