Literature DB >> 26272952

Integrated Model of Chemical Perturbations of a Biological Pathway Using 18 In Vitro High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Estrogen Receptor.

Richard S Judson1, Felicia Maria Magpantay2, Vijay Chickarmane3, Cymra Haskell4, Nessy Tania5, Jean Taylor6, Menghang Xia7, Ruili Huang7, Daniel M Rotroff8, Dayne L Filer9, Keith A Houck10, Matthew T Martin10, Nisha Sipes11, Ann M Richard10, Kamel Mansouri9, R Woodrow Setzer10, Thomas B Knudsen10, Kevin M Crofton10, Russell S Thomas10.   

Abstract

We demonstrate a computational network model that integrates 18 in vitro, high-throughput screening assays measuring estrogen receptor (ER) binding, dimerization, chromatin binding, transcriptional activation, and ER-dependent cell proliferation. The network model uses activity patterns across the in vitro assays to predict whether a chemical is an ER agonist or antagonist, or is otherwise influencing the assays through a manner dependent on the physics and chemistry of the technology platform ("assay interference"). The method is applied to a library of 1812 commercial and environmental chemicals, including 45 ER positive and negative reference chemicals. Among the reference chemicals, the network model correctly identified the agonists and antagonists with the exception of very weak compounds whose activity was outside the concentration range tested. The model agonist score also correlated with the expected potency class of the active reference chemicals. Of the 1812 chemicals evaluated, 111 (6.1%) were predicted to be strongly ER active in agonist or antagonist mode. This dataset and model were also used to begin a systematic investigation of assay interference. The most prominent cause of false-positive activity (activity in an assay that is likely not due to interaction of the chemical with ER) is cytotoxicity. The model provides the ability to prioritize a large set of important environmental chemicals with human exposure potential for additional in vivo endocrine testing. Finally, this model is generalizable to any molecular pathway for which there are multiple upstream and downstream assays available. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology 2015. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EDSP; In vitro; biological modeling; estrogen receptor; high-throughput screening; prioritization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26272952      PMCID: PMC4635633          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfv168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  42 in total

1.  Update on EPA's ToxCast program: providing high throughput decision support tools for chemical risk management.

Authors:  Robert Kavlock; Kelly Chandler; Keith Houck; Sid Hunter; Richard Judson; Nicole Kleinstreuer; Thomas Knudsen; Matt Martin; Stephanie Padilla; David Reif; Ann Richard; Daniel Rotroff; Nisha Sipes; David Dix
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Integration of dosimetry, exposure, and high-throughput screening data in chemical toxicity assessment.

Authors:  Barbara A Wetmore; John F Wambaugh; Stephen S Ferguson; Mark A Sochaski; Daniel M Rotroff; Kimberly Freeman; Harvey J Clewell; David J Dix; Melvin E Andersen; Keith A Houck; Brittany Allen; Richard S Judson; Reetu Singh; Robert J Kavlock; Ann M Richard; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  High-throughput models for exposure-based chemical prioritization in the ExpoCast project.

Authors:  John F Wambaugh; R Woodrow Setzer; David M Reif; Sumit Gangwal; Jade Mitchell-Blackwood; Jon A Arnot; Olivier Joliet; Alicia Frame; James Rabinowitz; Thomas B Knudsen; Richard S Judson; Peter Egeghy; Daniel Vallero; Elaine A Cohen Hubal
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Defining estrogenic mechanisms of bisphenol A analogs through high throughput microscopy-based contextual assays.

Authors:  Fabio Stossi; Michael J Bolt; Felicity J Ashcroft; Jane E Lamerdin; Jonathan S Melnick; Reid T Powell; Radhika D Dandekar; Maureen G Mancini; Cheryl L Walker; John K Westwick; Michael A Mancini
Journal:  Chem Biol       Date:  2014-05-22

5.  High throughput heuristics for prioritizing human exposure to environmental chemicals.

Authors:  John F Wambaugh; Anran Wang; Kathie L Dionisio; Alicia Frame; Peter Egeghy; Richard Judson; R Woodrow Setzer
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Estimating toxicity-related biological pathway altering doses for high-throughput chemical risk assessment.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Robert J Kavlock; R Woodrow Setzer; Elaine A Cohen Hubal; Matthew T Martin; Thomas B Knudsen; Keith A Houck; Russell S Thomas; Barbara A Wetmore; David J Dix
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.739

7.  Predictive endocrine testing in the 21st century using in vitro assays of estrogen receptor signaling responses.

Authors:  Daniel M Rotroff; Matt T Martin; David J Dix; Dayne L Filer; Keith A Houck; Thomas B Knudsen; Nisha S Sipes; David M Reif; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Richard S Judson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Real-time growth kinetics measuring hormone mimicry for ToxCast chemicals in T-47D human ductal carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Daniel M Rotroff; David J Dix; Keith A Houck; Robert J Kavlock; Thomas B Knudsen; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; Ann M Richard; Nisha S Sipes; Yama A Abassi; Can Jin; Melinda Stampfl; Richard S Judson
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.739

9.  A specific mechanism for nonspecific activation in reporter-gene assays.

Authors:  Douglas S Auld; Natasha Thorne; Dac-Trung Nguyen; James Inglese
Journal:  ACS Chem Biol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 5.100

10.  Profiling of the Tox21 10K compound library for agonists and antagonists of the estrogen receptor alpha signaling pathway.

Authors:  Ruili Huang; Srilatha Sakamuru; Matt T Martin; David M Reif; Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Warren Casey; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Keith R Shockley; Patricia Ceger; Jennifer Fostel; Kristine L Witt; Weida Tong; Daniel M Rotroff; Tongan Zhao; Paul Shinn; Anton Simeonov; David J Dix; Christopher P Austin; Robert J Kavlock; Raymond R Tice; Menghang Xia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  104 in total

1.  Dose- and Time-Dependent Transcriptional Response of Ishikawa Cells Exposed to Genistein.

Authors:  Jorge M Naciff; Zubin S Khambatta; Gregory J Carr; Jay P Tiesman; David W Singleton; Sohaib A Khan; George P Daston
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Use of big data in drug development for precision medicine.

Authors:  Rosa S Kim; Nicolas Goossens; Yujin Hoshida
Journal:  Expert Rev Precis Med Drug Dev       Date:  2016-04-28

3.  Moving Toward Integrating Gene Expression Profiling Into High-Throughput Testing: A Gene Expression Biomarker Accurately Predicts Estrogen Receptor α Modulation in a Microarray Compendium.

Authors:  Natalia Ryan; Brian Chorley; Raymond R Tice; Richard Judson; J Christopher Corton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Development of the Texas A&M Superfund Research Program Computational Platform for Data Integration, Visualization, and Analysis.

Authors:  Rajib Mukherjee; Melis Onel; Burcu Beykal; Adam T Szafran; Fabio Stossi; Michael A Mancini; Lan Zhou; Fred A Wright; Efstratios N Pistikopoulos
Journal:  ESCAPE       Date:  2019-07-25

5.  High-Content Screening Identifies Src Family Kinases as Potential Regulators of AR-V7 Expression and Androgen-Independent Cell Growth.

Authors:  Adam T Szafran; Cliff Stephan; Michael Bolt; Maureen G Mancini; Marco Marcelli; Michael A Mancini
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 4.104

6.  Evidence for Cross Species Extrapolation of Mammalian-Based High-Throughput Screening Assay Results.

Authors:  Carlie A LaLone; Daniel L Villeneuve; Jon A Doering; Brett R Blackwell; Thomas R Transue; Cody W Simmons; Joe Swintek; Sigmund J Degitz; Antony J Williams; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 9.028

7.  Channel Interactions and Robust Inference for Ratiometric β-lactamase Assay Data: a Tox21 Library Analysis.

Authors:  Fjodor Melnikov; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Nisha S Sipes; Paul T Anastas
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 8.198

8.  Avoiding False Positives and Optimizing Identification of True Negatives in Estrogen Receptor Binding and Agonist/Antagonist Assays.

Authors:  Michael W Hornung; Mark A Tapper; Jeffrey S Denny; Barbara R Sheedy; Raymond Erickson; Taylor J Sulerud; Richard C Kolanczyk; Patricia K Schmieder
Journal:  Appl In Vitro Toxicol       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  Editor's Highlight: Mechanistic Toxicity Tests Based on an Adverse Outcome Pathway Network for Hepatic Steatosis.

Authors:  Michelle M Angrish; Charlene A McQueen; Elaine Cohen-Hubal; Maribel Bruno; Yue Ge; Brian N Chorley
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Comparing Machine Learning Models for Aromatase (P450 19A1).

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.