Literature DB >> 32857505

Machine Learning Models for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity and Endocrine Disruption Prediction.

Kimberley M Zorn1, Daniel H Foil1, Thomas R Lane1, Daniel P Russo2, Wendy Hillwalker3, David J Feifarek3, Frank Jones3, William D Klaren3, Ashley M Brinkman3, Sean Ekins1.   

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) periodically releases in vitro data across a variety of targets, including the estrogen receptor (ER). In 2015, the EPA used these data to construct mathematical models of ER agonist and antagonist pathways to prioritize chemicals for endocrine disruption testing. However, mathematical models require in vitro data prior to predicting estrogenic activity, but machine learning methods are capable of prospective prediction from the molecular structure alone. The current study describes the generation and evaluation of Bayesian machine learning models grouped by the EPA's ER agonist pathway model using multiple data types with proprietary software, Assay Central. External predictions with three test sets of in vitro and in vivo reference chemicals with agonist activity classifications were compared to previous mathematical model publications. Training data sets were subjected to additional machine learning algorithms and compared with rank normalized scores of internal five-fold cross-validation statistics. External predictions were found to be comparable or superior to previous studies published by the EPA. When assessing six additional algorithms for the training data sets, Assay Central performed similarly at a reduced computational cost. This study demonstrates that machine learning can prioritize chemicals for future in vitro and in vivo testing of ER agonism.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32857505      PMCID: PMC8194504          DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03982

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  48 in total

1.  Classification of environmental estrogens by physicochemical properties using principal component analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis.

Authors:  T Suzuki; K Ide; M Ishida; S Shapiro
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2001 May-Jun

2.  Assessment of Substrate-Dependent Ligand Interactions at the Organic Cation Transporter OCT2 Using Six Model Substrates.

Authors:  Philip J Sandoval; Kimberley M Zorn; Alex M Clark; Sean Ekins; Stephen H Wright
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 3.  Endocrine disrupting chemicals targeting estrogen receptor signaling: identification and mechanisms of action.

Authors:  Erin K Shanle; Wei Xu
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  Identification of putative estrogen receptor-mediated endocrine disrupting chemicals using QSAR- and structure-based virtual screening approaches.

Authors:  Liying Zhang; Alexander Sedykh; Ashutosh Tripathi; Hao Zhu; Antreas Afantitis; Varnavas D Mouchlis; Georgia Melagraki; Ivan Rusyn; Alexander Tropsha
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2013-05-23       Impact factor: 4.219

5.  Using in vitro high throughput screening assays to identify potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Daniel M Rotroff; David J Dix; Keith A Houck; Thomas B Knudsen; Matthew T Martin; Keith W McLaurin; David M Reif; Kevin M Crofton; Amar V Singh; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Richard S Judson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  The EDKB: an established knowledge base for endocrine disrupting chemicals.

Authors:  Don Ding; Lei Xu; Hong Fang; Huixiao Hong; Roger Perkins; Steve Harris; Edward D Bearden; Leming Shi; Weida Tong
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Open Source Bayesian Models. 1. Application to ADME/Tox and Drug Discovery Datasets.

Authors:  Alex M Clark; Krishna Dole; Anna Coulon-Spektor; Andrew McNutt; George Grass; Joel S Freundlich; Robert C Reynolds; Sean Ekins
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.956

8.  CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project.

Authors:  Kamel Mansouri; Ahmed Abdelaziz; Aleksandra Rybacka; Alessandra Roncaglioni; Alexander Tropsha; Alexandre Varnek; Alexey Zakharov; Andrew Worth; Ann M Richard; Christopher M Grulke; Daniela Trisciuzzi; Denis Fourches; Dragos Horvath; Emilio Benfenati; Eugene Muratov; Eva Bay Wedebye; Francesca Grisoni; Giuseppe F Mangiatordi; Giuseppina M Incisivo; Huixiao Hong; Hui W Ng; Igor V Tetko; Ilya Balabin; Jayaram Kancherla; Jie Shen; Julien Burton; Marc Nicklaus; Matteo Cassotti; Nikolai G Nikolov; Orazio Nicolotti; Patrik L Andersson; Qingda Zang; Regina Politi; Richard D Beger; Roberto Todeschini; Ruili Huang; Sherif Farag; Sine A Rosenberg; Svetoslav Slavov; Xin Hu; Richard S Judson
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  Nonanimal Models for Acute Toxicity Evaluations: Applying Data-Driven Profiling and Read-Across.

Authors:  Daniel P Russo; Judy Strickland; Agnes L Karmaus; Wenyi Wang; Sunil Shende; Thomas Hartung; Lauren M Aleksunes; Hao Zhu
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 10.  High Throughput and Computational Repurposing for Neglected Diseases.

Authors:  Helen W Hernandez; Melinda Soeung; Kimberley M Zorn; Norah Ashoura; Melina Mottin; Carolina Horta Andrade; Conor R Caffrey; Jair Lage de Siqueira-Neto; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.200

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparing Machine Learning Models for Aromatase (P450 19A1).

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.028

2.  Comparison of Machine Learning Models for the Androgen Receptor.

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Bioactivity Comparison across Multiple Machine Learning Algorithms Using over 5000 Datasets for Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Thomas R Lane; Daniel H Foil; Eni Minerali; Fabio Urbina; Kimberley M Zorn; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Predicting Potential Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Binding to Estrogen Receptor α (ERα) Using a Pipeline Combining Structure-Based and Ligand-Based in Silico Methods.

Authors:  Asma Sellami; Matthieu Montes; Nathalie Lagarde
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Artificial Intelligent Deep Learning Molecular Generative Modeling of Scaffold-Focused and Cannabinoid CB2 Target-Specific Small-Molecule Sublibraries.

Authors:  Yuemin Bian; Xiang-Qun Xie
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 6.  Review of in silico studies dedicated to the nuclear receptor family: Therapeutic prospects and toxicological concerns.

Authors:  Asma Sellami; Manon Réau; Matthieu Montes; Nathalie Lagarde
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 6.055

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.