Literature DB >> 27208079

Editor's Highlight: Analysis of the Effects of Cell Stress and Cytotoxicity on In Vitro Assay Activity Across a Diverse Chemical and Assay Space.

Richard Judson1, Keith Houck2, Matt Martin2, Ann M Richard2, Thomas B Knudsen2, Imran Shah2, Stephen Little2, John Wambaugh2, R Woodrow Setzer2, Parth Kothiya3, Jimmy Phuong3, Dayne Filer4, Doris Smith2, David Reif5, Daniel Rotroff5, Nicole Kleinstreuer6, Nisha Sipes7, Menghang Xia8, Ruili Huang8, Kevin Crofton2, Russell S Thomas2.   

Abstract

Chemical toxicity can arise from disruption of specific biomolecular functions or through more generalized cell stress and cytotoxicity-mediated processes. Here, responses of 1060 chemicals including pharmaceuticals, natural products, pesticidals, consumer, and industrial chemicals across a battery of 815 in vitro assay endpoints from 7 high-throughput assay technology platforms were analyzed in order to distinguish between these types of activities. Both cell-based and cell-free assays showed a rapid increase in the frequency of responses at concentrations where cell stress/cytotoxicity responses were observed in cell-based assays. Chemicals that were positive on at least 2 viability/cytotoxicity assays within the concentration range tested (typically up to 100 μM) activated a median of 12% of assay endpoints whereas those that were not cytotoxic in this concentration range activated 1.3% of the assays endpoints. The results suggest that activity can be broadly divided into: (1) specific biomolecular interactions against one or more targets (eg, receptors or enzymes) at concentrations below which overt cytotoxicity-associated activity is observed; and (2) activity associated with cell stress or cytotoxicity, which may result from triggering specific cell stress pathways, chemical reactivity, physico-chemical disruption of proteins or membranes, or broad low-affinity non-covalent interactions. Chemicals showing a greater number of specific biomolecular interactions are generally designed to be bioactive (pharmaceuticals or pesticidal active ingredients), whereas intentional food-use chemicals tended to show the fewest specific interactions. The analyses presented here provide context for use of these data in ongoing studies to predict in vivo toxicity from chemicals lacking extensive hazard assessment. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology 2016. This work is written by US Government employees and is in the public domain in the US.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In vitro; cell stress; cytotoxicity; high-throughput screening; oxidative stress

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27208079      PMCID: PMC6280881          DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Toxicol Sci        ISSN: 1096-0929            Impact factor:   4.849


  51 in total

Review 1.  Adverse outcome pathways: a conceptual framework to support ecotoxicology research and risk assessment.

Authors:  Gerald T Ankley; Richard S Bennett; Russell J Erickson; Dale J Hoff; Michael W Hornung; Rodney D Johnson; David R Mount; John W Nichols; Christine L Russom; Patricia K Schmieder; Jose A Serrrano; Joseph E Tietge; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.742

2.  Characterization of compound mechanisms and secondary activities by BioMAP analysis.

Authors:  Ellen L Berg; Eric J Kunkel; Evangelos Hytopoulos; Ivan Plavec
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 1.950

3.  Toxicology. Transforming environmental health protection.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; George M Gray; John R Bucher
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays.

Authors:  Jonathan B Baell; Georgina A Holloway
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Phenotypic screening of the ToxCast chemical library to classify toxic and therapeutic mechanisms.

Authors:  Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Jian Yang; Ellen L Berg; Thomas B Knudsen; Ann M Richard; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; Richard S Judson; Mark Polokoff; David J Dix; Robert J Kavlock; Keith A Houck
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 54.908

6.  An integrated stress response regulates amino acid metabolism and resistance to oxidative stress.

Authors:  Heather P Harding; Yuhong Zhang; Huiquing Zeng; Isabel Novoa; Phoebe D Lu; Marcella Calfon; Navid Sadri; Chi Yun; Brian Popko; Richard Paules; David F Stojdl; John C Bell; Thore Hettmann; Jeffrey M Leiden; David Ron
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Profiling bioactivity of the ToxCast chemical library using BioMAP primary human cell systems.

Authors:  Keith A Houck; David J Dix; Richard S Judson; Robert J Kavlock; Jian Yang; Ellen L Berg
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2009-09-22

8.  Rules for identifying potentially reactive or promiscuous compounds.

Authors:  Robert F Bruns; Ian A Watson
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 9.  IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a noncancer mode of action for humans.

Authors:  Alan R Boobis; John E Doe; Barbara Heinrich-Hirsch; M E Bette Meek; Sharon Munn; Mathuros Ruchirawat; Josef Schlatter; Jennifer Seed; Carolyn Vickers
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.635

10.  Systems toxicology: from basic research to risk assessment.

Authors:  Shana J Sturla; Alan R Boobis; Rex E FitzGerald; Julia Hoeng; Robert J Kavlock; Kristin Schirmer; Maurice Whelan; Martin F Wilks; Manuel C Peitsch
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.739

View more
  43 in total

1.  Use of high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening data in cancer hazard evaluations by IARC Monograph Working Groups.

Authors:  Weihsueh A Chiu; Kathryn Z Guyton; Matthew T Martin; David M Reif; Ivan Rusyn
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 6.043

2.  Screening the ToxCast Phase 1, Phase 2, and e1k Chemical Libraries for Inhibitors of Iodothyronine Deiodinases.

Authors:  Jennifer H Olker; Joseph J Korte; Jeffrey S Denny; Phillip C Hartig; Mary C Cardon; Carsten N Knutsen; Paige M Kent; Jessica P Christensen; Sigmund J Degitz; Michael W Hornung
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Workflow for defining reference chemicals for assessing performance of in vitro assays.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Russell S Thomas; Nancy Baker; Anita Simha; Xia Meng Howey; Carmen Marable; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Keith A Houck
Journal:  ALTEX       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 6.043

4.  Evaluation of androgen assay results using a curated Hershberger database.

Authors:  N C Kleinstreuer; P Browne; X Chang; R Judson; W Casey; P Ceger; C Deisenroth; N Baker; K Markey; R S Thomas
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.143

5.  The advantages of linear concentration-response curves for in vitro bioassays with environmental samples.

Authors:  Beate I Escher; Peta A Neale; Daniel L Villeneuve
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 3.742

Review 6.  The Impact of Novel Assessment Methodologies in Toxicology on Green Chemistry and Chemical Alternatives.

Authors:  Ivan Rusyn; Nigel Greene
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Application of the hard and soft, acids and bases (HSAB) theory as a method to predict cumulative neurotoxicity.

Authors:  Fjodor Melnikov; Brian C Geohagen; Terrence Gavin; Richard M LoPachin; Paul T Anastas; Phillip Coish; David W Herr
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 4.294

8.  Differentiating Pathway-Specific From Nonspecific Effects in High-Throughput Toxicity Data: A Foundation for Prioritizing Adverse Outcome Pathway Development.

Authors:  Kellie A Fay; Daniel L Villeneuve; Joe Swintek; Stephen W Edwards; Mark D Nelms; Brett R Blackwell; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Stress Forces First Lineage Differentiation of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells; Validation of a High-Throughput Screen for Toxicant Stress.

Authors:  Quanwen Li; Erica Louden; Jordan Zhou; Sascha Drewlo; Jing Dai; Elizabeth E Puscheck; Kang Chen; Daniel A Rappolee
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.272

10.  On selecting a minimal set of in vitro assays to reliably determine estrogen agonist activity.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Keith A Houck; Eric D Watt; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 3.271

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.