Literature DB >> 26066997

Screening Chemicals for Estrogen Receptor Bioactivity Using a Computational Model.

Patience Browne1, Richard S Judson2, Warren M Casey3, Nicole C Kleinstreuer4, Russell S Thomas2.   

Abstract

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is considering high-throughput and computational methods to evaluate the endocrine bioactivity of environmental chemicals. Here we describe a multistep, performance-based validation of new methods and demonstrate that these new tools are sufficiently robust to be used in the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP). Results from 18 estrogen receptor (ER) ToxCast high-throughput screening assays were integrated into a computational model that can discriminate bioactivity from assay-specific interference and cytotoxicity. Model scores range from 0 (no activity) to 1 (bioactivity of 17β-estradiol). ToxCast ER model performance was evaluated for reference chemicals, as well as results of EDSP Tier 1 screening assays in current practice. The ToxCast ER model accuracy was 86% to 93% when compared to reference chemicals and predicted results of EDSP Tier 1 guideline and other uterotrophic studies with 84% to 100% accuracy. The performance of high-throughput assays and ToxCast ER model predictions demonstrates that these methods correctly identify active and inactive reference chemicals, provide a measure of relative ER bioactivity, and rapidly identify chemicals with potential endocrine bioactivities for additional screening and testing. EPA is accepting ToxCast ER model data for 1812 chemicals as alternatives for EDSP Tier 1 ER binding, ER transactivation, and uterotrophic assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26066997     DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b02641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  77 in total

1.  Integrated Model of Chemical Perturbations of a Biological Pathway Using 18 In Vitro High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Estrogen Receptor.

Authors:  Richard S Judson; Felicia Maria Magpantay; Vijay Chickarmane; Cymra Haskell; Nessy Tania; Jean Taylor; Menghang Xia; Ruili Huang; Daniel M Rotroff; Dayne L Filer; Keith A Houck; Matthew T Martin; Nisha Sipes; Ann M Richard; Kamel Mansouri; R Woodrow Setzer; Thomas B Knudsen; Kevin M Crofton; Russell S Thomas
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Moving Toward Integrating Gene Expression Profiling Into High-Throughput Testing: A Gene Expression Biomarker Accurately Predicts Estrogen Receptor α Modulation in a Microarray Compendium.

Authors:  Natalia Ryan; Brian Chorley; Raymond R Tice; Richard Judson; J Christopher Corton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  A case study on the application of an expert-driven read-across approach in support of quantitative risk assessment of p,p'-dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane.

Authors:  Lucina E Lizarraga; Jeffry L Dean; J Phillip Kaiser; Scott C Wesselkamper; Jason C Lambert; Q Jay Zhao
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Current limitations and recommendations to improve testing for the environmental assessment of endocrine active substances.

Authors:  Katherine K Coady; Ronald C Biever; Nancy D Denslow; Melanie Gross; Patrick D Guiney; Henrik Holbech; Natalie K Karouna-Renier; Ioanna Katsiadaki; Hank Krueger; Steven L Levine; Gerd Maack; Mike Williams; Jeffrey C Wolf; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.992

5.  FutureTox III: Bridges for Translation.

Authors:  Daland R Juberg; Thomas B Knudsen; Miriam Sander; Nancy B Beck; Elaine M Faustman; Donna L Mendrick; John R Fowle; Thomas Hartung; Raymond R Tice; Emmanuel Lemazurier; Richard A Becker; Suzanne Compton Fitzpatrick; George P Daston; Alison Harrill; Ronald N Hines; Douglas A Keller; John C Lipscomb; David Watson; Tina Bahadori; Kevin M Crofton
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Evaluation of androgen assay results using a curated Hershberger database.

Authors:  N C Kleinstreuer; P Browne; X Chang; R Judson; W Casey; P Ceger; C Deisenroth; N Baker; K Markey; R S Thomas
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2018-09-08       Impact factor: 3.143

7.  Evidence for Cross Species Extrapolation of Mammalian-Based High-Throughput Screening Assay Results.

Authors:  Carlie A LaLone; Daniel L Villeneuve; Jon A Doering; Brett R Blackwell; Thomas R Transue; Cody W Simmons; Joe Swintek; Sigmund J Degitz; Antony J Williams; Gerald T Ankley
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Channel Interactions and Robust Inference for Ratiometric β-lactamase Assay Data: a Tox21 Library Analysis.

Authors:  Fjodor Melnikov; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Nisha S Sipes; Paul T Anastas
Journal:  ACS Sustain Chem Eng       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 8.198

9.  Comparing Machine Learning Models for Aromatase (P450 19A1).

Authors:  Kimberley M Zorn; Daniel H Foil; Thomas R Lane; Wendy Hillwalker; David J Feifarek; Frank Jones; William D Klaren; Ashley M Brinkman; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  A predictive data-driven framework for endocrine prioritization: a triazole fungicide case study.

Authors:  Katie Paul Friedman; Sabitha Papineni; M Sue Marty; Kun Don Yi; Amber K Goetz; Reza J Rasoulpour; Pat Kwiatkowski; Douglas C Wolf; Ann M Blacker; Richard C Peffer
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 5.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.