| Literature DB >> 28928381 |
Qing-Hui Yu1, Baike Wang2, Ning Li2, Yaping Tang2, Shengbao Yang2, Tao Yang2, Juan Xu2, Chunmiao Guo2, Peng Yan2, Qiang Wang2, Patiguli Asmutola2.
Abstract
Quickly and precisely gain genetically enhanced breeding elites with value-adding performance traits is desired by the crop breeders all the time. The present of gene editing technologies, especially the CRISPR/Cas9 system with the capacities of efficiency, versatility and multiplexing provides a reasonable expectation towards breeding goals. For exploiting possible application to accelerate the speed of process at breeding by CRISPR/Cas9 technology, in this study, the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 system transformation method was used for obtaining tomato ALC gene mutagenesis and replacement, in absence and presence of the homologous repair template. The average mutation frequency (72.73%) and low replacement efficiency (7.69%) were achieved in T0 transgenic plants respectively. None of homozygous mutation was detected in T0 transgenic plants, but one plant carry the heterozygous genes (Cas9/*-ALC/alc) was stably transmitted to T1 generations for segregation and genotyping. Finally, the desired alc homozygous mutants without T-DNA insertion (*/*-alc/alc) in T1 generations were acquired and further confirmed by genotype and phenotype characterization, with highlight of excellent storage performance, thus the recessive homozygous breeding elites with the character of long-shelf life were generated. Our results support that CRISPR/Cas9-induced gene replacement via HDR provides a valuable method for breeding elite innovation in tomato.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28928381 PMCID: PMC5605656 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-12262-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Tomato gene editing system mediated by CRISPR/Cas9. (A) The schematic description of CRISPR/Cas9-sgRNA expression cassette: SpCas9 is controlled by a CaMV 35S promoter, the sgRNA is expressed by the AtU6 promoter; Red letters mark the target sequence of ALC target site, blue letters mark the PAM (the protospacer adjacent motif), yellow highlighted ‘A’ marks the mutational site of ALC/alc gene. (B) The sequenced targeted InDel mutation of ALC gene. 24 clones of the each PCR amplicon were picked and sequenced; “H” means Heterozygote, “B” means Biallele, “C” means Chimera. (C) Strategy of Homologous-directed Repair: Red letters mark the target sequence recognized by cognate sgRNA, yellow highlighted letters mark the replacement and be replacement. (D) Sequencing results of repair fragment through HDR: Red arrow points to the base which is the repair base through HDR. (E) The gene segregation in T1 populations of a single plant (Cas9/*-ALC/alc) which from T0 lines. (F) The potential off-target sites of ALC gene detected in tomato genome: ALC-Target marks the target sequence, ALC-NI (Nearly Identical sequences) mark the potential off-target sequences; Blue letters marks the PAM sequence, red letters mark the unmatched bases.
Mutation of ALC gene in tomato T0 generation.
| Target gene | N0. of detected lines | Zygosity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homozygote | Heterozygote | Biallele | Chimera | WT | ||
|
| 11 | 0 | 2(18.18%) | 1(9.09%) | 5(45.45%) | 3(27.27%) |
Homology-directed repair of the target site of ALC gene in tomato T0 generation.
| Target gene | Expectation repaired gene | N0. of examed lines | Zygosity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homozygote | Heterozygote | Chimera | WT or Mutations | |||
|
|
| 26 | 0 | 1(3.85%) | 1(3.85%) | 24(92.31%) |
Gene segregation in tomato T1 generation plants.
| Genotype |
|
| */* | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Genotype | ||||
|
| 12 | 26 | 14 | 52 |
|
| 24 | 50 | 23 | 97 |
|
| 13 | 27 | 11 | 51 |
| Total | 49 | 103 | 48 | 200 |
Figure 2Phenotypic detection of wild-type fruits and mutant fruits. (A) Phenotype Value: ‘PH’ means plant height, ‘SD’ means stem diameter, ‘SSC’ means soluble solid content, ‘FT’ means flesh thickness, ‘CR’ means compression resistance, ‘M’ means mutation, ‘W’ means wild-type. (B) Comparison of bisected fruit at the ripening stage. (C) Developmental series of wild-type fruits (up) and mutant fruits (down). (D) Comparison of fruits after 40 days of storage at room temperature, left is homozygous T1 mutants and right is wild-type. Bars:1 cm.