Literature DB >> 32457089

Plant Genome Editing and the Relevance of Off-Target Changes.

Nathaniel Graham1,2, Gunvant B Patil3, David M Bubeck4, Raymond C Dobert5, Kevin C Glenn5, Annie T Gutsche4, Sandeep Kumar4, John A Lindbo6, Luis Maas7, Gregory D May4, Miguel E Vega-Sanchez5, Robert M Stupar3, Peter L Morrell8.   

Abstract

Site-directed nucleases (SDNs) used for targeted genome editing are powerful new tools to introduce precise genetic changes into plants. Like traditional approaches, such as conventional crossing and induced mutagenesis, genome editing aims to improve crop yield and nutrition. Next-generation sequencing studies demonstrate that across their genomes, populations of crop species typically carry millions of single nucleotide polymorphisms and many copy number and structural variants. Spontaneous mutations occur at rates of ∼10-8 to 10-9 per site per generation, while variation induced by chemical treatment or ionizing radiation results in higher mutation rates. In the context of SDNs, an off-target change or edit is an unintended, nonspecific mutation occurring at a site with sequence similarity to the targeted edit region. SDN-mediated off-target changes can contribute to a small number of additional genetic variants compared to those that occur naturally in breeding populations or are introduced by induced-mutagenesis methods. Recent studies show that using computational algorithms to design genome editing reagents can mitigate off-target edits in plants. Finally, crops are subject to strong selection to eliminate off-type plants through well-established multigenerational breeding, selection, and commercial variety development practices. Within this context, off-target edits in crops present no new safety concerns compared to other breeding practices. The current generation of genome editing technologies is already proving useful to develop new plant varieties with consumer and farmer benefits. Genome editing will likely undergo improved editing specificity along with new developments in SDN delivery and increasing genomic characterization, further improving reagent design and application.
© 2020 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32457089      PMCID: PMC7401131          DOI: 10.1104/pp.19.01194

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.340


  183 in total

1.  TILLMore, a resource for the discovery of chemically induced mutants in barley.

Authors:  Valentina Talamè; Riccardo Bovina; Maria Corinna Sanguineti; Roberto Tuberosa; Udda Lundqvist; Silvio Salvi
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2008-04-15       Impact factor: 9.803

2.  Construction of the third-generation Zea mays haplotype map.

Authors:  Robert Bukowski; Xiaosen Guo; Yanli Lu; Cheng Zou; Bing He; Zhengqin Rong; Bo Wang; Dawen Xu; Bicheng Yang; Chuanxiao Xie; Longjiang Fan; Shibin Gao; Xun Xu; Gengyun Zhang; Yingrui Li; Yinping Jiao; John F Doebley; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Anne Lorant; Vince Buffalo; M Cinta Romay; Edward S Buckler; Doreen Ware; Jinsheng Lai; Qi Sun; Yunbi Xu
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 6.524

Review 3.  Genome engineering with zinc-finger nucleases.

Authors:  Dana Carroll
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Cascade of chromosomal rearrangements caused by a heterogeneous T-DNA integration supports the double-stranded break repair model for T-DNA integration.

Authors:  Yufei Hu; Zhiyu Chen; Chuxiong Zhuang; Jilei Huang
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  Low number of fixed somatic mutations in a long-lived oak tree.

Authors:  Emanuel Schmid-Siegert; Namrata Sarkar; Christian Iseli; Sandra Calderon; Caroline Gouhier-Darimont; Jacqueline Chrast; Pietro Cattaneo; Frédéric Schütz; Laurent Farinelli; Marco Pagni; Michel Schneider; Jérémie Voumard; Michel Jaboyedoff; Christian Fankhauser; Christian S Hardtke; Laurent Keller; John R Pannell; Alexandre Reymond; Marc Robinson-Rechavi; Ioannis Xenarios; Philippe Reymond
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 15.793

6.  Quantification of the tissue-culture induced variation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.).

Authors:  Piotr T Bednarek; Renata Orłowska; Robert M D Koebner; Janusz Zimny
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2007-03-02       Impact factor: 4.215

7.  Evaluation of genetic variation among Brazilian soybean cultivars through genome resequencing.

Authors:  João Vitor Maldonado dos Santos; Babu Valliyodan; Trupti Joshi; Saad M Khan; Yang Liu; Juexin Wang; Tri D Vuong; Marcelo Fernandes de Oliveira; Francismar Corrêa Marcelino-Guimarães; Dong Xu; Henry T Nguyen; Ricardo Vilela Abdelnoor
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Manipulation of nuclear architecture through CRISPR-mediated chromosomal looping.

Authors:  Stefanie L Morgan; Natasha C Mariano; Abel Bermudez; Nicole L Arruda; Fangting Wu; Yunhai Luo; Gautam Shankar; Lin Jia; Huiling Chen; Ji-Fan Hu; Andrew R Hoffman; Chiao-Chain Huang; Sharon J Pitteri; Kevin C Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  A method for the production and expedient screening of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated non-transgenic mutant plants.

Authors:  Longzheng Chen; Wei Li; Lorenzo Katin-Grazzini; Jing Ding; Xianbin Gu; Yanjun Li; Tingting Gu; Ren Wang; Xinchun Lin; Ziniu Deng; Richard J McAvoy; Frederick G Gmitter; Zhanao Deng; Yunde Zhao; Yi Li
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 6.793

10.  Whole genome re-sequencing reveals genome-wide variations among parental lines of 16 mapping populations in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.).

Authors:  Mahendar Thudi; Aamir W Khan; Vinay Kumar; Pooran M Gaur; Krishnamohan Katta; Vanika Garg; Manish Roorkiwal; Srinivasan Samineni; Rajeev K Varshney
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 4.215

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  CRISPR/Cas- and Topical RNAi-Based Technologies for Crop Management and Improvement: Reviewing the Risk Assessment and Challenges Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture.

Authors:  Fabiano Touzdjian Pinheiro Kohlrausch Távora; Francisco de Assis Dos Santos Diniz; Camila de Moraes Rêgo-Machado; Natália Chagas Freitas; Fabrício Barbosa Monteiro Arraes; Eduardo Chumbinho de Andrade; Leila Lourenço Furtado; Karen Ofuji Osiro; Natália Lima de Sousa; Thiago Bérgamo Cardoso; Liliane Márcia Mertz Henning; Patrícia Abrão de Oliveira Molinari; Sérgio Enrique Feingold; Wayne B Hunter; Maria Fátima Grossi de Sá; Adilson Kenji Kobayashi; Alexandre Lima Nepomuceno; Thaís Ribeiro Santiago; Hugo Bruno Correa Molinari
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-06-28

Review 2.  Occurrence and Nature of Off-Target Modifications by CRISPR-Cas Genome Editing in Plants.

Authors:  Mark H J Sturme; Jan Pieter van der Berg; Lianne M S Bouwman; Adinda De Schrijver; Ruud A de Maagd; Gijs A Kleter; Evy Battaglia-de Wilde
Journal:  ACS Agric Sci Technol       Date:  2022-03-03

3.  Genome-wide specificity of plant genome editing by both CRISPR-Cas9 and TALEN.

Authors:  Nadia Bessoltane; Florence Charlot; Anouchka Guyon-Debast; Delphine Charif; Kostlend Mara; Cécile Collonnier; Pierre-François Perroud; Mark Tepfer; Fabien Nogué
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Expert opinions on the regulation of plant genome editing.

Authors:  Rim Lassoued; Peter W B Phillips; Diego Maximiliano Macall; Hayley Hesseln; Stuart J Smyth
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 9.803

5.  Obligatory metabolomic profiling of gene-edited crops is risk disproportionate.

Authors:  Maria Fedorova; Rod A Herman
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 6.417

6.  Impacts of the regulatory environment for gene editing on delivering beneficial products.

Authors:  Daniel Jenkins; Raymond Dobert; Ana Atanassova; Chloe Pavely
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 2.252

7.  Turning promise into practice: Crop biotechnology for increasing genetic diversity and climate resilience.

Authors:  Sarah Garland; Helen Anne Curry
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 9.593

8.  Perennials as Future Grain Crops: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Chapman; Hanne Cecilie Thomsen; Sophia Tulloch; Pedro M P Correia; Guangbin Luo; Javad Najafi; Lee R DeHaan; Timothy E Crews; Lennart Olsson; Per-Olof Lundquist; Anna Westerbergh; Pai Rosager Pedas; Søren Knudsen; Michael Palmgren
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 9.  From Genome Sequencing to CRISPR-Based Genome Editing for Climate-Resilient Forest Trees.

Authors:  Hieu Xuan Cao; Giang Thi Ha Vu; Oliver Gailing
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Fast neutron mutagenesis in soybean enriches for small indels and creates frameshift mutations.

Authors:  Skylar R Wyant; M Fernanda Rodriguez; Corey K Carter; Wayne A Parrott; Scott A Jackson; Robert M Stupar; Peter L Morrell
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.542

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.