Literature DB >> 33825100

Genome editing in fruit, ornamental, and industrial crops.

Fabiola Ramirez-Torres1, Rishikesh Ghogare1, Evan Stowe1, Pedro Cerdá-Bennasser2, Maria Lobato-Gómez2, Bruce A Williamson-Benavides1, Patricia Sarai Giron-Calva2, Seanna Hewitt1, Paul Christou2,3, Amit Dhingra4.   

Abstract

The advent of genome editing has opened new avenues for targeted trait enhancement in fruit, ornamental, industrial, and all specialty crops. In particular, CRISPR-based editing systems, derived from bacterial immune systems, have quickly become routinely used tools for research groups across the world seeking to edit plant genomes with a greater level of precision, higher efficiency, reduced off-target effects, and overall ease-of-use compared to ZFNs and TALENs. CRISPR systems have been applied successfully to a number of horticultural and industrial crops to enhance fruit ripening, increase stress tolerance, modify plant architecture, control the timing of flower development, and enhance the accumulation of desired metabolites, among other commercially-important traits. As editing technologies continue to advance, so too does the ability to generate improved crop varieties with non-transgenic modifications; in some crops, direct transgene-free edits have already been achieved, while in others, T-DNAs have successfully been segregated out through crossing. In addition to the potential to produce non-transgenic edited crops, and thereby circumvent regulatory impediments to the release of new, improved crop varieties, targeted gene editing can speed up trait improvement in crops with long juvenile phases, reducing inputs resulting in faster market introduction to the market. While many challenges remain regarding optimization of genome editing in ornamental, fruit, and industrial crops, the ongoing discovery of novel nucleases with niche specialties for engineering applications may form the basis for additional and potentially crop-specific editing strategies.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR/Cas; Crop improvement; Genome editing; Non-model crops; Non-transgenic genome editing; Precision breeding; Targeted mutations

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33825100      PMCID: PMC9524402          DOI: 10.1007/s11248-021-00240-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   3.145


  149 in total

1.  Re-evaluation of the rin mutation and the role of RIN in the induction of tomato ripening.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ito; Ayako Nishizawa-Yokoi; Masaki Endo; Masafumi Mikami; Yoko Shima; Nobutaka Nakamura; Eiichi Kotake-Nara; Susumu Kawasaki; Seiichi Toki
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 15.793

2.  Engineering Quantitative Trait Variation for Crop Improvement by Genome Editing.

Authors:  Daniel Rodríguez-Leal; Zachary H Lemmon; Jarrett Man; Madelaine E Bartlett; Zachary B Lippman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  CRISPR-Cas9 Targeted Mutagenesis Leads to Simultaneous Modification of Different Homoeologous Gene Copies in Polyploid Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus).

Authors:  Janina Braatz; Hans-Joachim Harloff; Martin Mascher; Nils Stein; Axel Himmelbach; Christian Jung
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Lateral organ boundaries 1 is a disease susceptibility gene for citrus bacterial canker disease.

Authors:  Yang Hu; Junli Zhang; Hongge Jia; Davide Sosso; Ting Li; Wolf B Frommer; Bing Yang; Frank F White; Nian Wang; Jeffrey B Jones
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Genome editing of the disease susceptibility gene CsLOB1 in citrus confers resistance to citrus canker.

Authors:  Hongge Jia; Yunzeng Zhang; Vladimir Orbović; Jin Xu; Frank F White; Jeffrey B Jones; Nian Wang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 9.803

6.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis of TAS4 and MYBA7 loci in grapevine rootstock 101-14.

Authors:  Sukumaran Sunitha; Christopher D Rock
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  Establishment of Efficient Genetic Transformation Systems and Application of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing Technology in Lilium pumilum DC. Fisch. and Lilium longiflorum White Heaven.

Authors:  Rui Yan; Zhiping Wang; Yamin Ren; Hongyu Li; Na Liu; Hongmei Sun
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  High-frequency, precise modification of the tomato genome.

Authors:  Tomáš Čermák; Nicholas J Baltes; Radim Čegan; Yong Zhang; Daniel F Voytas
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 13.583

9.  Efficient increase of ɣ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) content in tomato fruits by targeted mutagenesis.

Authors:  Satoko Nonaka; Chikako Arai; Mariko Takayama; Chiaki Matsukura; Hiroshi Ezura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Establishment of a PEG-mediated protoplast transformation system based on DNA and CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes for banana.

Authors:  Shaoping Wu; Haocheng Zhu; Jinxing Liu; Qiaosong Yang; Xiuhong Shao; Fangcheng Bi; Chunhua Hu; Heqiang Huo; Kunling Chen; Ganjun Yi
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 4.215

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Genome editing for resistance against plant pests and pathogens.

Authors:  Cláudia Rato; Miguel F Carvalho; Cristina Azevedo; Paula Rodrigues Oblessuc
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Preface: Genome editing in plants.

Authors:  Paul Christou; Amit Dhingra; Inez H Slamet-Loedin; Margarida Oliveira; Supriya Chakraborty; Johannes Buyel; Eva Stoger; Stefan Schillberg; Diego Orzaez; Hector Quemada
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 2.788

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.