Literature DB >> 32875668

Rapid reconstruction of highly undersampled, non-Cartesian real-time cine k-space data using a perceptual complex neural network (PCNN).

Daming Shen1,2, Sushobhan Ghosh3, Hassan Haji-Valizadeh1,2, Ashitha Pathrose2, Florian Schiffers3, Daniel C Lee2,4, Benjamin H Freed4, Michael Markl1,2, Oliver S Cossairt3, Aggelos K Katsaggelos5, Daniel Kim1,2.   

Abstract

Highly accelerated real-time cine MRI using compressed sensing (CS) is a promising approach to achieve high spatio-temporal resolution and clinically acceptable image quality in patients with arrhythmia and/or dyspnea. However, its lengthy image reconstruction time may hinder its clinical translation. The purpose of this study was to develop a neural network for reconstruction of non-Cartesian real-time cine MRI k-space data faster (<1 min per slice with 80 frames) than graphics processing unit (GPU)-accelerated CS reconstruction, without significant loss in image quality or accuracy in left ventricular (LV) functional parameters. We introduce a perceptual complex neural network (PCNN) that trains on complex-valued MRI signal and incorporates a perceptual loss term to suppress incoherent image details. This PCNN was trained and tested with multi-slice, multi-phase, cine images from 40 patients (20 for training, 20 for testing), where the zero-filled images were used as input and the corresponding CS reconstructed images were used as practical ground truth. The resulting images were compared using quantitative metrics (structural similarity index (SSIM) and normalized root mean square error (NRMSE)) and visual scores (conspicuity, temporal fidelity, artifacts, and noise scores), individually graded on a five-point scale (1, worst; 3, acceptable; 5, best), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF). The mean processing time per slice with 80 frames for PCNN was 23.7 ± 1.9 s for pre-processing (Step 1, same as CS) and 0.822 ± 0.004 s for dealiasing (Step 2, 166 times faster than CS). Our PCNN produced higher data fidelity metrics (SSIM = 0.88 ± 0.02, NRMSE = 0.014 ± 0.004) compared with CS. While all the visual scores were significantly different (P < 0.05), the median scores were all 4.0 or higher for both CS and PCNN. LVEFs measured from CS and PCNN were strongly correlated (R2 = 0.92) and in good agreement (mean difference = -1.4% [2.3% of mean]; limit of agreement = 10.6% [17.6% of mean]). The proposed PCNN is capable of rapid reconstruction (25 s per slice with 80 frames) of non-Cartesian real-time cine MRI k-space data, without significant loss in image quality or accuracy in LV functional parameters.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  compressed sensing (CS); convolutional neural network (CNN); deep learning (DL); perceptual complex neural network (PCNN); perceptual loss; real-time cine MRI

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32875668      PMCID: PMC8793037          DOI: 10.1002/nbm.4405

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  29 in total

1.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging.

Authors:  Michael Lustig; David Donoho; John M Pauly
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Golden ratio sparse MRI using tiny golden angles.

Authors:  Stefan Wundrak; Jan Paul; Johannes Ulrici; Erich Hell; Margrit-Ann Geibel; Peter Bernhardt; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Volker Rasche
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Deep Convolutional Neural Network for Inverse Problems in Imaging.

Authors:  Michael T McCann; Emmanuel Froustey; Michael Unser
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 10.856

4.  Simple auto-calibrated gradient delay estimation from few spokes using Radial Intersections (RING).

Authors:  Sebastian Rosenzweig; H Christian M Holme; Martin Uecker
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-11-04       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Recurrent inference machines for reconstructing heterogeneous MRI data.

Authors:  Kai Lønning; Patrick Putzky; Jan-Jakob Sonke; Liesbeth Reneman; Matthan W A Caan; Max Welling
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for Dynamic MR Image Reconstruction.

Authors:  Jo Schlemper; Jose Caballero; Joseph V Hajnal; Anthony N Price; Daniel Rueckert
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Deep learning with domain adaptation for accelerated projection-reconstruction MR.

Authors:  Yoseob Han; Jaejun Yoo; Hak Hee Kim; Hee Jung Shin; Kyunghyun Sung; Jong Chul Ye
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2018-02-04       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Validation of highly accelerated real-time cardiac cine MRI with radial k-space sampling and compressed sensing in patients at 1.5T and 3T.

Authors:  Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Amir A Rahsepar; Jeremy D Collins; Elwin Bassett; Tamara Isakova; Tobias Block; Ganesh Adluru; Edward V R DiBella; Daniel C Lee; James C Carr; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2017-09-17       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Rapid Reconstruction of Four-dimensional MR Angiography of the Thoracic Aorta Using a Convolutional Neural Network.

Authors:  Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Daming Shen; Ryan J Avery; Ali M Serhal; Florian A Schiffers; Aggelos K Katsaggelos; Oliver S Cossairt; Daniel Kim
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-06-25

10.  Deep Generative Adversarial Neural Networks for Compressive Sensing MRI.

Authors:  Morteza Mardani; Enhao Gong; Joseph Y Cheng; Shreyas S Vasanawala; Greg Zaharchuk; Lei Xing; John M Pauly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  1 in total

1.  An inline deep learning based free-breathing ECG-free cine for exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Manuel A Morales; Salah Assana; Xiaoying Cai; Kelvin Chow; Hassan Haji-Valizadeh; Eiryu Sai; Connie Tsao; Jason Matos; Jennifer Rodriguez; Sophie Berg; Neal Whitehead; Patrick Pierce; Beth Goddu; Warren J Manning; Reza Nezafat
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2022-08-11       Impact factor: 6.903

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.