Literature DB >> 16414478

The effect of cementing technique on structural fixation of pegged glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Richard W Nyffeler1, Dominik Meyer, Ralph Sheikh, Bruno J Koller, Christian Gerber.   

Abstract

Although loosening of cemented glenoid components is one of the major complications of total shoulder arthroplasty, there is little information about factors affecting initial fixation of these components in the scapular neck. This study was performed to assess the characteristics of structural fixation of pegged glenoid components, if inserted with two different recommended cementing techniques. Six fresh-frozen shoulder specimens and two types of glenoid components were used. The glenoids were prepared according to the instructions and with the instrumentation of the manufacturer. In 3 specimens, the bone cement was inserted into the peg receiving holes (n = 12) and applied to the back surface of the glenoid component with a syringe. In the other 3 specimens, the cement was inserted into the holes (n = 15) by use of pure finger pressure: no cement was applied on the backside of the component. Micro-computed tomography scans with a resolution of 36 microm showed an intact cement mantle around all 12 pegs (100%) when a syringe was used. An incomplete cement plug was found in 7 of 15 pegs (47%) when the finger-pressure technique was used. Cement penetration into the cancellous bone was deeper in osteopenic bone. Application of bone cement on the backside of the glenoid prosthesis improved seating by filling out small spaces between bone and polyethylene resulting from irregularities after reaming or local cement extrusion from a drill hole. The fixation of a pegged glenoid component is better if the holes are filled with cement under pressure by use of a syringe and if cement is applied to the back of the glenoid component than if cement is inserted with pure finger pressure and no cement is applied to the back surface of the component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16414478     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of thirty eight cemented pegged glenoid components with variable backside curvature: two-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Florence Dauzère; Marine Arboucalot; Julie Lebon; Fanny Elia; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Effect of glenoid perforation during total shoulder arthroplasty on glenoid component cement fixation and suprascapular nerve.

Authors:  Gregory I Pace; Rachel A Thomas; Connor L Zale; Gregory S Lewis; Raymond Y Kim; H Mike Kim
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2020-01-13

3.  In vitro measurement of temperature changes during implantation of cemented glenoid components.

Authors:  Patric Raiss; Guido Pape; Sebastian Jäger; Markus Loew; Rudi Bitsch; Markus Rickert
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.717

4.  Computed tomography quantification of bone density adjacent to cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Barbara Amore; Paolo Paladini; Enrico Cavagna; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-11-26

5.  Shoulder arthroplasty in osteoarthritis: current concepts in biomechanics and surgical technique.

Authors:  G Merolla; G Nastrucci; G Porcellini
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2013-05-06

6.  Effect of critical shoulder angle, glenoid lateralization, and humeral inclination on range of movement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Lädermann; Eileen Tay; Philippe Collin; Sébastien Piotton; Chih-Hao Chiu; Aude Michelet; Caecilia Charbonnier
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 5.853

7.  A systematic review of clinical outcomes for outpatient vs. inpatient shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Edward Perera; Breanne Flood; Kim Madden; Danny P Goel; Timothy Leroux; Moin Khan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-04-28

8.  An in vitro study comparing limited to full cementation of polyethylene glenoid components.

Authors:  R Andrew Glennie; Joshua W Giles; James A Johnson; George S Athwal; Kenneth J Faber
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Observation of initial postoperative radiolucent lines using a modern pegged-glenoid design.

Authors:  Nathan G Everding; Jonathan C Levy; Nathan T Formaini; Sara Blum; Carlos C Gil; Kevin Verde
Journal:  Int J Shoulder Surg       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.