Literature DB >> 22078322

A ten-year radiologic comparison of two-all polyethylene glenoid component designs: a prospective trial.

Philippe Collin1, Aaron K L Tay, Barbara Melis, Pascal Boileau, Gilles Walch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aseptic glenoid component loosening remains a common problem in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). This study presents long-term prospective follow-up of 2 cemented all-polyethylene glenoid components with different backside design geometry and the effect on the presence and progression of radiolucent lines (RLLs).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six TSAs were performed for primary osteoarthritis. Two surgeons used an identical technique to implant 32 flat-back and 24 convex-back glenoids. In particular, the glenoid components were cemented after a minimal reaming and bone compaction. Standardized postoperative radiologic and clinical follow-up was at 2 and 10 years. Three independent observers evaluated the x-ray images for RLLs around the base plate and keel. The results were analyzed for progression and influencing factors.
RESULTS: At 10 years, progression of RLL was seen in both components, but there was no difference between the 2 glenoid designs (P = .16). Younger patient age (P = .03), hand dominance (P = .017), and presence of early RLLs (P = .018) were significant factors for progression of RLLs. Constant scores deteriorated with progression of RLLs (P = .006). The glenoid revision rate at 10 years was 5%.
CONCLUSION: At 10 years there was no difference in the presence or progression of RRLs between a flat-back and a convex-back glenoid all-polyethylene design. Young age, hand dominance, and poor implantation technique influence glenoid RLLs and affect the clinical result of TSA.
Copyright © 2011 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22078322     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  15 in total

1.  [Glenoid replacement for omarthritis : indications, technique, results and new developments].

Authors:  M Pfahler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Akash Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Patients Undergoing Total Shoulder Arthroplasty on the Dominant Extremity Attain Greater Postoperative ROM.

Authors:  Gregory L Cvetanovich; Peter N Chalmers; Jonathan J Streit; Anthony A Romeo; Gregory P Nicholson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Is there sufficient evidence to support intervention to manage shoulder arthritis?

Authors:  Damian Bull; Andrew Tai Kie; Birgit Hanusch; Rohit Kulkarni; Jonathan Rees; Amar Rangan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-01-08

5.  Evaluation of thirty eight cemented pegged glenoid components with variable backside curvature: two-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Florence Dauzère; Marine Arboucalot; Julie Lebon; Fanny Elia; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Does Postoperative Glenoid Retroversion Affect the 2-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Benjamin C Service; Jason E Hsu; Jeremy S Somerson; Stacy M Russ; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Comparison of general versus isolated regional anesthesia in total shoulder arthroplasty: A retrospective propensity-matched cohort analysis.

Authors:  David Y Ding; Siddharth A Mahure; Brent Mollon; Steven D Shamah; Joseph D Zuckerman; Young W Kwon
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-07-21

8.  Can the ream and run procedure improve glenohumeral relationships and function for shoulders with the arthritic triad?

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Winston J Warme; Sarah E Jackins
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Cement pressurizing reduces radiolucent lines at glenoid: A randomized, multicentric study.

Authors:  Philip Kasten; Patric Raiss; Felix Zeifang; Richard Stangl; Stefan Greiner; Matthias Zumstein; Jörg Nowotny; Katrin Schmitt; Marc Schnetzke; Falk Reuther; Dirk Frauenschuh
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-08-01

10.  New design of a cementless glenoid component in unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective medium-term analysis of 143 cases.

Authors:  D Katz; J Kany; P Valenti; P Sauzières; P Gleyze; K El Kholti
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-10-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.