Literature DB >> 25487898

Glenohumeral mismatch affects micromotion of cemented glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty.

Vani J Sabesan1, Jeffrey Ackerman2, Vinay Sharma1, Kevin C Baker3, Michael D Kurdziel3, J Michael Wiater4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The "rocking horse" phenomenon is considered the main cause of glenoid component loosening by eccentric loading of the glenoid rim. This study aimed to investigate the influence of increasing glenohumeral implant mismatch on bone-implant interface micromotion in a cemented all-polyethylene pegged glenoid biomechanical model.
METHODS: Five glenoid sizes, 40 mm, 44 mm, 48 mm, 52 mm, and 56 mm, representing +2 mm, +6 mm, +10 mm, +14 mm, and +18 mm glenohumeral mismatch, respectively, were cyclically loaded according to ASTM Standard F2028-08 at a constant frequency of 2 Hz to a size-dependent humeral head subluxation translation. Additional glenoid components were cyclically loaded to their subluxation translations at a constant humeral head rate of 4.4 mm/s. Component micromotion was characterized as compression, distraction, and superior-inferior translation measured by differential variable reluctance transducers.
RESULTS: During constant frequency tests, 52-mm and 56-mm glenoids were unable to complete cyclic testing because of catastrophic failure of the glenoid-implant interface and permanent glenoid deformation, probably due to increasing severity of testing parameters. When tested at a constant humeral head speed, 48-mm, 52-mm, and 56-mm glenoids had significantly increased glenoid distraction and glenoid translation at cycle 50,000 compared with cycle 1. Distraction and translation measurements for 52-mm and 56-mm glenoids were significantly greater compared with 40-mm, 44-mm, and 48-mm glenoids at 50,000 cycles.
CONCLUSIONS: In a biomechanical model, optimal glenohumeral mismatch in cemented pegged glenoid implants is multifactorial and has not been definitively established. However, our data suggest that a radial mismatch of less than +10 mm may decrease the risk of glenoid micromotion.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Total shoulder arthroplasty; basic science study; biomechanical testing; glenohumeral radial mismatch; glenoid loosening

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25487898     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2014.10.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of thirty eight cemented pegged glenoid components with variable backside curvature: two-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Florence Dauzère; Marine Arboucalot; Julie Lebon; Fanny Elia; Nicolas Bonnevialle; Pierre Mansat
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Stability of small pegs for cementless implant fixation.

Authors:  Diogo M Geraldes; Ulrich Hansen; Jonathan Jeffers; Andrew A Amis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  Pathogenesis, Evaluation, and Management of Osteolysis After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kyle N Kunze; Laura M Krivicich; Christopher Brusalis; Samuel A Taylor; Lawrence V Gulotta; Joshua S Dines; Michael C Fu
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2022-07-05

4.  The effect of radial mismatch on radiographic glenoid loosening.

Authors:  Bradley S Schoch; Thomas W Wright; Joseph D Zuckerman; Pierre-Henri Flurin; Charlotte Bolch; Chris P Roche; Joseph J King
Journal:  JSES Open Access       Date:  2019-11-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.