Naci Kocer1, Prabath Kumar Mondel2, Elif Yamac2, Ayse Kavak3, Osman Kizilkilic2, Civan Islak2. 1. Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Kocamustafapasa, 34098, Istanbul, Turkey. nkocer@istanbul.edu.tr. 2. Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul University, Kocamustafapasa, 34098, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Department of Dermatology, Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Tevfik Sağlam Cad. No: 11, Zuhuratbaba Mah., 34147, Bakirköy/Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Flow diverters are increasingly used in the treatment of complex and giant intracranial aneurysms. However, they are associated with complications like late aneurysmal rupture. Additionally, flow diverters show focal structural decrease in luminal diameter without any intimal hyperplasia. This resembles a "fish mouth" when viewed en face. In this pilot study, we tested the hypothesis of a possible association between flow diverter fish-mouthing and delayed-type hypersensitivity to its metal constituents. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patient records from our center between May 2010 and November 2015. A total of nine patients had flow diverter fish mouthing. A control group of 25 patients was selected. All study participants underwent prospective patch test to detect hypersensitivity to flow diverter metal constituents. Analysis was performed using logistic regression analysis and Wilcoxon sign rank sum test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to test variables to predict flow diverter fish mouthing. RESULTS: The association between flow diverter fish mouthing and positive patch test was not statistically significant. In multivariate analysis, history of allergy and maximum aneurysm size category was associated with flow diverter fish mouthing. This was further confirmed on Wilcoxon sign rank sum test. CONCLUSION: The study showed statistically significant association between flow diverter fish mouthing and history of contact allergy and a small aneurysmal size. Further large-scale studies are needed to detect a statistically significant association between flow diverter fish mouthing and patch test. We recommend early and more frequent follow-up imaging in patients with contact allergy to detect flow diverter fish mouthing and its subsequent evolution.
PURPOSE: Flow diverters are increasingly used in the treatment of complex and giant intracranial aneurysms. However, they are associated with complications like late aneurysmal rupture. Additionally, flow diverters show focal structural decrease in luminal diameter without any intimal hyperplasia. This resembles a "fish mouth" when viewed en face. In this pilot study, we tested the hypothesis of a possible association between flow diverter fish-mouthing and delayed-type hypersensitivity to its metal constituents. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patient records from our center between May 2010 and November 2015. A total of nine patients had flow diverter fish mouthing. A control group of 25 patients was selected. All study participants underwent prospective patch test to detect hypersensitivity to flow diverter metal constituents. Analysis was performed using logistic regression analysis and Wilcoxon sign rank sum test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to test variables to predict flow diverter fish mouthing. RESULTS: The association between flow diverter fish mouthing and positive patch test was not statistically significant. In multivariate analysis, history of allergy and maximum aneurysm size category was associated with flow diverter fish mouthing. This was further confirmed on Wilcoxon sign rank sum test. CONCLUSION: The study showed statistically significant association between flow diverter fish mouthing and history of contact allergy and a small aneurysmal size. Further large-scale studies are needed to detect a statistically significant association between flow diverter fish mouthing and patch test. We recommend early and more frequent follow-up imaging in patients with contact allergy to detect flow diverter fish mouthing and its subsequent evolution.
Entities:
Keywords:
Contact allergy; Delayed-type hypersensitivity; Fish mouthing; Flow diverter; In-stent stenosis; Patch test
Authors: J P Cruz; M Chow; C O'Kelly; B Marotta; J Spears; W Montanera; D Fiorella; T Marotta Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-03-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Kyle M Fargen; Brian L Hoh; Babu G Welch; G Lee Pride; Giuseppe Lanzino; Alan S Boulos; Jeffrey S Carpenter; Ansaar Rai; Erol Veznedaroglu; Andrew Ringer; Rafael Rodriguez-Mercado; Peter Kan; Adnan Siddiqui; Elad I Levy; J Mocco Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Laurent Estrade; Alina Makoyeva; Tim E Darsaut; Jimmy Ghostine; Evgueni Kouznetsov; Igor Salazkin; Daniel Roy; Alain Weill; Jean Raymond Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2013-12-18 Impact factor: 1.610
Authors: Hannes Luecking; Arnd Doerfler; Philipp Goelitz; Philip Hoelter; Tobias Engelhorn; Stefan Lang Journal: Interv Neuroradiol Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 1.610