Literature DB >> 10871093

Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value of patch testing: the more you test, the more you get? ESCD Working Party on Epidemiology.

T L Diepgen1, P J Coenraads.   

Abstract

Pathophysiological variability affects the results of patch testing. In addition, even a minimal degree of test-imprecision due to this variability has a number of important statistical consequences for the analysis and interpretation of any patch test data set. One such statistical phenomenon that is often overlooked is the dependence of the positive predictive value (i.e., the predictive value of a positive patch test) on sensitivity and specificity, the impact of which is heavily dependent on the proportion of truly allergic subjects that are studied. A 2nd important issue is the fact that patch testing is performed in series, which means multiple tests. If we assume, for example, a patch test series of only 10 allergens, then it can be demonstrated that there is a random probability of over 40%) to find, simply by chance, for at least 1 allergen, a statistically significant difference between 2 groups of patients. Comparison of the results of series between patients calls for statistical adjustments in order to prevent erroneously positive differences and/or associations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10871093     DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042006315.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  11 in total

1.  Secondary individual prevention of hand dermatitis in geriatric nurses.

Authors:  Nanna Y Schürer; Ulrike Klippel; Hans J Schwanitz
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Guidelines of care for the management of atopic dermatitis: Section 4. Prevention of disease flares and use of adjunctive therapies and approaches.

Authors:  Robert Sidbury; Wynnis L Tom; James N Bergman; Kevin D Cooper; Robert A Silverman; Timothy G Berger; Sarah L Chamlin; David E Cohen; Kelly M Cordoro; Dawn M Davis; Steven R Feldman; Jon M Hanifin; Alfons Krol; David J Margolis; Amy S Paller; Kathryn Schwarzenberger; Eric L Simpson; Hywel C Williams; Craig A Elmets; Julie Block; Christopher G Harrod; Wendy Smith Begolka; Lawrence F Eichenfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 11.527

3.  Is there an association between flow diverter fish mouthing and delayed-type hypersensitivity to metals?-a case-control study.

Authors:  Naci Kocer; Prabath Kumar Mondel; Elif Yamac; Ayse Kavak; Osman Kizilkilic; Civan Islak
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  [Epidemiologic surveillance of contact allergens. The "monitoring series" of IVDK (Information Network ofDermatologic Clinics for Detection and Scientific Evaluation of Contact Allergy].

Authors:  W Aberer; P Komericki; W Uter; B M Hausen; H Lessmann; B Kränke; J Geier; A Schnuch
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Novel metal allergy patch test using metal nanoballs.

Authors:  Tomoko Sugiyama; Motohiro Uo; Takahiro Wada; Toshio Hongo; Daisuke Omagari; Kazuo Komiyama; Hitoshi Sasaki; Heishichiro Takahashi; Mikio Kusama; Yoshiyuki Mori
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 10.435

6.  A method to visualize transdermal nickel permeation in mouse skin using a nickel allergy patch.

Authors:  Tomoko Sugiyama; Motohiro Uo; Takahiro Wada; Toshio Hongo; Daisuke Omagari; Kazuo Komiyama; Masakazu Oikawa; Mikio Kusama; Yoshiyuki Mori
Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.300

7.  Chronic tarsal conjunctivitis.

Authors:  Nicholas Cook; Fizza Mushtaq; Christina Leitner; Andrew Ilchyshyn; George T Smith; Ian A Cree
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.209

Review 8.  Contact Allergy: A Review of Current Problems from a Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Wolfgang Uter; Thomas Werfel; Ian R White; Jeanne D Johansen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Comment: Allergen-specific exposure associated with high immunoglobulin E and eye rubbing predisposes to progression of keratoconus.

Authors:  Yogita Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.848

10.  Reply: Allergen-specific exposure associated with high immunoglobulin E and eye rubbing predisposes to progression of keratoconus.

Authors:  Rohit Shetty; Shraddha Sureka; Pallak Kusumgar; Swaminathan Sethu; Kanchan Sainani
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.