Literature DB >> 28821589

Multi-population Genomic Relationships for Estimating Current Genetic Variances Within and Genetic Correlations Between Populations.

Yvonne C J Wientjes1, Piter Bijma2, Jérémie Vandenplas2, Mario P L Calus2.   

Abstract

Different methods are available to calculate multi-population genomic relationship matrices. Since those matrices differ in base population, it is anticipated that the method used to calculate genomic relationships affects the estimate of genetic variances, covariances, and correlations. The aim of this article is to define the multi-population genomic relationship matrix to estimate current genetic variances within and genetic correlations between populations. The genomic relationship matrix containing two populations consists of four blocks, one block for population 1, one block for population 2, and two blocks for relationships between the populations. It is known, based on literature, that by using current allele frequencies to calculate genomic relationships within a population, current genetic variances are estimated. In this article, we theoretically derived the properties of the genomic relationship matrix to estimate genetic correlations between populations and validated it using simulations. When the scaling factor of across-population genomic relationships is equal to the product of the square roots of the scaling factors for within-population genomic relationships, the genetic correlation is estimated unbiasedly even though estimated genetic variances do not necessarily refer to the current population. When this property is not met, the correlation based on estimated variances should be multiplied by a correction factor based on the scaling factors. In this study, we present a genomic relationship matrix which directly estimates current genetic variances as well as genetic correlations between populations.
Copyright © 2017 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  GenPred; Genomic Selection; Shared Data Resources; genetic correlation between populations; genetic variance; genomic relationships; multi-trait model

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28821589      PMCID: PMC5629319          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.300152

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  42 in total

Review 1.  Structure of linkage disequilibrium in plants.

Authors:  Sherry A Flint-Garcia; Jeffry M Thornsberry; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 26.379

2.  Increased accuracy of artificial selection by using the realized relationship matrix.

Authors:  B J Hayes; P M Visscher; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  QMSim: a large-scale genome simulator for livestock.

Authors:  Mehdi Sargolzaei; Flavio S Schenkel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Transethnic Genetic-Correlation Estimates from Summary Statistics.

Authors:  Brielin C Brown; Chun Jimmie Ye; Alkes L Price; Noah Zaitlen
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses to selection.

Authors:  B B Bohren; W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-02       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.

Authors:  L Chen; F Schenkel; M Vinsky; D H Crews; C Li
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Using Bayesian Multilevel Whole Genome Regression Models for Partial Pooling of Training Sets in Genomic Prediction.

Authors:  Frank Technow; L Radu Totir
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Multi-population genomic prediction using a multi-task Bayesian learning model.

Authors:  Liuhong Chen; Changxi Li; Stephen Miller; Flavio Schenkel
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 2.797

View more
  20 in total

1.  Genomic prediction for crossbred performance using metafounders.

Authors:  Elizabeth M van Grevenhof; Jérémie Vandenplas; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Genetic Variance Partitioning and Genome-Wide Prediction with Allele Dosage Information in Autotetraploid Potato.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Endelman; Cari A Schmitz Carley; Paul C Bethke; Joseph J Coombs; Mark E Clough; Washington L da Silva; Walter S De Jong; David S Douches; Curtis M Frederick; Kathleen G Haynes; David G Holm; J Creighton Miller; Patricio R Muñoz; Felix M Navarro; Richard G Novy; Jiwan P Palta; Gregory A Porter; Kyle T Rak; Vidyasagar R Sathuvalli; Asunta L Thompson; G Craig Yencho
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Modeling heterotic effects in beef cattle using genome-wide SNP-marker genotypes.

Authors:  Everestus C Akanno; Mohammed K Abo-Ismail; Liuhong Chen; John J Crowley; Zhiquan Wang; Changxi Li; John A Basarab; Michael D MacNeil; Graham S Plastow
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.

Authors:  Yvette Steyn; Daniela A L Lourenco; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Accounting for Group-Specific Allele Effects and Admixture in Genomic Predictions: Theory and Experimental Evaluation in Maize.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Building a Calibration Set for Genomic Prediction, Characteristics to Be Considered, and Optimization Approaches.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Renaud Rincent
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

7.  Genomic Prediction of Complex Traits, Principles, Overview of Factors Affecting the Reliability of Genomic Prediction, and Algebra of the Reliability.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Elsen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

8.  Genomic evaluation and genome-wide association studies for total number of teats in a combined American and Danish Yorkshire pig populations selected in China.

Authors:  Fang Fang; Jielin Li; Meng Guo; Quanshun Mei; Mei Yu; Huiming Liu; Andres Legarra; Tao Xiang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 3.338

9.  Genomic prediction for numerically small breeds, using models with pre-selected and differentially weighted markers.

Authors:  Biaty Raymond; Aniek C Bouwman; Yvonne C J Wientjes; Chris Schrooten; Jeanine Houwing-Duistermaat; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-10-10       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Genomic selection efficiency and a priori estimation of accuracy in a structured dent maize panel.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Tristan Mary-Huard; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.