Literature DB >> 24078618

Accuracy of predicting genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in Angus and Charolais beef cattle.

L Chen1, F Schenkel, M Vinsky, D H Crews, C Li.   

Abstract

In beef cattle, phenotypic data that are difficult and/or costly to measure, such as feed efficiency, and DNA marker genotypes are usually available on a small number of animals of different breeds or populations. To achieve a maximal accuracy of genomic prediction using the phenotype and genotype data, strategies for forming a training population to predict genomic breeding values (GEBV) of the selection candidates need to be evaluated. In this study, we examined the accuracy of predicting GEBV for residual feed intake (RFI) based on 522 Angus and 395 Charolais steers genotyped on SNP with the Illumina Bovine SNP50 Beadchip for 3 training population forming strategies: within breed, across breed, and by pooling data from the 2 breeds (i.e., combined). Two other scenarios with the training and validation data split by birth year and by sire family within a breed were also investigated to assess the impact of genetic relationships on the accuracy of genomic prediction. Three statistical methods including the best linear unbiased prediction with the relationship matrix defined based on the pedigree (PBLUP), based on the SNP genotypes (GBLUP), and a Bayesian method (BayesB) were used to predict the GEBV. The results showed that the accuracy of the GEBV prediction was the highest when the prediction was within breed and when the validation population had greater genetic relationships with the training population, with a maximum of 0.58 for Angus and 0.64 for Charolais. The within-breed prediction accuracies dropped to 0.29 and 0.38, respectively, when the validation populations had a minimal pedigree link with the training population. When the training population of a different breed was used to predict the GEBV of the validation population, that is, across-breed genomic prediction, the accuracies were further reduced to 0.10 to 0.22, depending on the prediction method used. Pooling data from the 2 breeds to form the training population resulted in accuracies increased to 0.31 and 0.43, respectively, for the Angus and Charolais validation populations. The results suggested that the genetic relationship of selection candidates with the training population has a greater impact on the accuracy of GEBV using the Illumina Bovine SNP50 Beadchip. Pooling data from different breeds to form the training population will improve the accuracy of across breed genomic prediction for RFI in beef cattle.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24078618     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-5715

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  16 in total

1.  The impact of clustering methods for cross-validation, choice of phenotypes, and genotyping strategies on the accuracy of genomic predictions.

Authors:  Johnna L Baller; Jeremy T Howard; Stephen D Kachman; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Multi-population Genomic Relationships for Estimating Current Genetic Variances Within and Genetic Correlations Between Populations.

Authors:  Yvonne C J Wientjes; Piter Bijma; Jérémie Vandenplas; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Modeling heterotic effects in beef cattle using genome-wide SNP-marker genotypes.

Authors:  Everestus C Akanno; Mohammed K Abo-Ismail; Liuhong Chen; John J Crowley; Zhiquan Wang; Changxi Li; John A Basarab; Michael D MacNeil; Graham S Plastow
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Accounting for Group-Specific Allele Effects and Admixture in Genomic Predictions: Theory and Experimental Evaluation in Maize.

Authors:  Simon Rio; Laurence Moreau; Alain Charcosset; Tristan Mary-Huard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Genetic potential for residual feed intake and diet fed during early- to mid-gestation influences post-natal DNA methylation of imprinted genes in muscle and liver tissues in beef cattle.

Authors:  Julia Devos; Amir Behrouzi; Francois Paradis; Christina Straathof; Changxi Li; Marcos Colazo; Hushton Block; Carolyn Fitzsimmons
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.

Authors:  André M Hidalgo; John W M Bastiaansen; Marcos S Lopes; Barbara Harlizius; Martien A M Groenen; Dirk-Jan de Koning
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 7.  Methods to address poultry robustness and welfare issues through breeding and associated ethical considerations.

Authors:  William M Muir; Heng-Wei Cheng; Candace Croney
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Genomic Prediction Within and Across Biparental Families: Means and Variances of Prediction Accuracy and Usefulness of Deterministic Equations.

Authors:  Pascal Schopp; Dominik Müller; Yvonne C J Wientjes; Albrecht E Melchinger
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Uncovering Sub-Structure and Genomic Profiles in Across-Countries Subpopulations of Angus Cattle.

Authors:  Diercles Francisco Cardoso; Gerardo Alves Fernandes Júnior; Daiane Cristina Becker Scalez; Anderson Antonio Carvalho Alves; Ana Fabrícia Braga Magalhães; Tiago Bresolin; Ricardo Vieira Ventura; Changxi Li; Márcia Cristina de Sena Oliveira; Laercio Ribeiro Porto-Neto; Roberto Carvalheiro; Henrique Nunes de Oliveira; Humberto Tonhati; Lucia Galvão Albuquerque
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Genomic correlation: harnessing the benefit of combining two unrelated populations for genomic selection.

Authors:  Laercio R Porto-Neto; William Barendse; John M Henshall; Sean M McWilliam; Sigrid A Lehnert; Antonio Reverter
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.