Literature DB >> 31539424

Genomic predictions in purebreds with a multibreed genomic relationship matrix1.

Yvette Steyn1, Daniela A L Lourenco1, Ignacy Misztal1.   

Abstract

Combining breeds in a multibreed evaluation can have a negative impact on prediction accuracy, especially if single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects differ among breeds. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of a multibreed genomic relationship matrix (G), where SNP effects are considered to be unique to each breed, that is, nonshared. This multibreed G was created by treating SNP of different breeds as if they were on nonoverlapping positions on the chromosome, although, in reality, they were not. This simple setup may avoid spurious Identity by state (IBS) relationships between breeds and automatically considers breed-specific allele frequencies. This scenario was contrasted to a regular multibreed evaluation where all SNPs were shared, that is, the same position, and to single-breed evaluations. Different SNP densities (9k and 45k) and different effective population sizes (Ne) were tested. Five breeds mimicking recent beef cattle populations that diverged from the same historical population were simulated using different selection criteria. It was assumed that quantitative trait locus (QTL) effects were the same over all breeds. For the recent population, generations 1-9 had approximately half of the animals genotyped, whereas all animals in generation 10 were genotyped. Generation 10 animals were set for validation; therefore, each breed had a validation group. Analyses were performed using single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction. Prediction accuracy was calculated as the correlation between true (T) and genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV). Accuracies of GEBV were lower for the larger Ne and low SNP density. All three evaluation scenarios using 45k resulted in similar accuracies, suggesting that the marker density is high enough to account for relationships and linkage disequilibrium with QTL. A shared multibreed evaluation using 9k resulted in a decrease of accuracy of 0.08 for a smaller Ne and 0.12 for a larger Ne. This loss was mostly avoided when markers were treated as nonshared within the same G matrix. A G matrix with nonshared SNP enables multibreed evaluations without considerably changing accuracy, especially with limited information per breed.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  across-breed evaluation; genomic selection; marker effect model; single nucleotide polymorphism–best linear unbiased prediction

Year:  2019        PMID: 31539424      PMCID: PMC6827462          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skz296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  45 in total

1.  Effects of DGAT1 variants on milk production traits in German cattle breeds.

Authors:  G Thaller; W Krämer; A Winter; B Kaupe; G Erhardt; R Fries
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods.

Authors:  Hans D Daetwyler; Ricardo Pong-Wong; Beatriz Villanueva; John A Woolliams
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Evolution in Mendelian Populations.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1931-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Using the unified relationship matrix adjusted by breed-wise allele frequencies in genomic evaluation of a multibreed population.

Authors:  M L Makgahlela; I Strandén; U S Nielsen; M J Sillanpää; E A Mäntysaari
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Efficient single-step genomic evaluation for a multibreed beef cattle population having many genotyped animals.

Authors:  E A Mäntysaari; R D Evans; I Strandén
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Multibreed genomic evaluations using purebred Holsteins, Jerseys, and Brown Swiss.

Authors:  K M Olson; P M VanRaden; M E Tooker
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Estimation of genomic breeding values for residual feed intake in a multibreed cattle population.

Authors:  M Khansefid; J E Pryce; S Bolormaa; S P Miller; Z Wang; C Li; M E Goddard
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Crossbred evaluations using single-step genomic BLUP and algorithm for proven and young with different sources of data1.

Authors:  Ivan Pocrnic; Daniela A L Lourenco; Ching-Yi Chen; William O Herring; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models.

Authors:  Sofiene Karoui; María Jesús Carabaño; Clara Díaz; Andrés Legarra
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Utility of whole-genome sequence data for across-breed genomic prediction.

Authors:  Biaty Raymond; Aniek C Bouwman; Chris Schrooten; Jeanine Houwing-Duistermaat; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2018-05-18       Impact factor: 4.297

View more
  2 in total

1.  Genomic prediction using a reference population of multiple pure breeds and admixed individuals.

Authors:  Emre Karaman; Guosheng Su; Iola Croue; Mogens S Lund
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.297

2.  Assessing the genetic background and genomic relatedness of red cattle populations originating from Northern Europe.

Authors:  Christin Schmidtmann; Anna Schönherz; Bernt Guldbrandtsen; Jovana Marjanovic; Mario Calus; Dirk Hinrichs; Georg Thaller
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2021-03-06       Impact factor: 4.297

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.