Literature DB >> 28812153

Establishing the learning curve of transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms.

Lawrence Lee1, Justin Kelly2, George J Nassif2, Deborah Keller3, Teresa C Debeche-Adams2, Paul A Mancuso2, John R Monson2, Matthew R Albert2, Sam B Atallah2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is an endoscopic operating platform for local excision of rectal neoplasms. However, it may be technically demanding, and its learning curve has yet to be adequately defined. The objective of this study was to determine the number of TAMIS procedures for the local excision of rectal neoplasm required to reach proficiency. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: All TAMIS cases performed from 07/2009 to 12/2016 at a single high-volume tertiary care institution for local excision of benign and malignant rectal neoplasia were identified from a prospective database. A cumulative summation (CUSUM) analysis was performed to determine the number of cases required to reach proficiency. The main proficiency outcome was rate of margin positivity (R1 resection). The acceptable and unacceptable R1 rates were defined as the R1 rate of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM-10%) and traditional transanal excision (TAE-26%), which was obtained from previously published meta-analyses. Comparisons of patient, tumor, and operative characteristics before and after TAMIS proficiency were performed.
RESULTS: A total of 254 TAMIS procedures were included in this study. The overall R1 resection rate was 7%. The indication for TAMIS was malignancy in 57%. CUSUM analysis reported that TAMIS reached an acceptable R1 rate between 14 and 24 cases. Moving average plots also showed that the mean operative times stabilized by proficiency gain. The mean lesion size was larger after proficiency gain (3.0 cm (SD 1.5) vs. 2.3 cm (SD 1.3), p = 0.008). All other patient, tumor, and operative characteristics were similar before and after proficiency gain.
CONCLUSIONS: TAMIS for local excision of rectal neoplasms is a complex procedure that requires a minimum of 14-24 cases to reach an acceptable R1 resection rate and lower operative duration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Learning curve; Local excision; Transanal minimally invasive surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28812153     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5817-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  48 in total

1.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward.

Authors:  Sam Atallah; Matthew Albert; Sergio Larach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is superior to transanal excision of rectal adenomas.

Authors:  E J R de Graaf; J W A Burger; A L A van Ijsseldijk; G W M Tetteroo; I Dawson; W C J Hop
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgery.

Authors:  Kevin Kaity Sng; Masayasu Hara; Jae-Won Shin; Byung-Eun Yoo; Kyung-Sook Yang; Seon-Hahn Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The implementation of a transanal endoscopic microsurgery programme: initial experience with surgical performance.

Authors:  R M Helewa; A N Rajaee; I Raiche; L Williams; M Paquin-Gobeil; R P Boushey; H Moloo
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Endoscopic surgery in the rectum.

Authors:  G Buess; R Theiss; M Günther; F Hutterer; H Pichlmaier
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 10.093

6.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumors: indications and results.

Authors:  N Demartines; M O von Flüe; F H Harder
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Long-term follow-up of patients with rectal cancer managed by local excision with and without adjuvant irradiation.

Authors:  A Chakravarti; C C Compton; P C Shellito; W C Wood; J Landry; S R Machuta; D Kaufman; M Ancukiewicz; C G Willett
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Evaluation of the learning curve in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: comparison of right-sided and left-sided resections.

Authors:  Paris P Tekkis; Antony J Senagore; Conor P Delaney; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 9.  Learning curve for transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Antonio Maya; Andrew Vorenberg; Myrian Oviedo; Giovanna da Silva; Steven D Wexner; Dana Sands
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Colorectal surgeons' learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  Renée M Barendse; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Ursula R Rolf; Arnold B Bijnen; Esther C J Consten; Christiaan Hoff; Evelien Dekker; Paul Fockens; Willem A Bemelman; Eelco J R de Graaf
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  13 in total

1.  The effect of proctoring on the learning curve of transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms.

Authors:  S H E M Clermonts; Y T van Loon; J Stijns; H Pottel; D K Wasowicz; D D E Zimmerman
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  TAMIS is a valuable alternative to TEM for resection of intraluminal rectal tumors.

Authors:  F Van den Eynde; J Jaekers; S Fieuws; A M D'Hoore; A M Wolthuis
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  Can less be more? Organ preservation strategies in the management of rectal cancer.

Authors:  F Rouleau-Fournier; C J Brown
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 4.  Transanal Endoscopic Surgery: Who Should Be Doing This Procedure?

Authors:  François Rouleau Fournier; Carl James Brown
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-02-28

Review 5.  Transanal Endoscopic Platforms: TAMIS versus Rigid Platforms: Pros and Cons.

Authors:  Liam A Devane; Meghan C Daly; Matthew R Albert
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2022-02-28

6.  Short- and long-term outcomes in ypT2 rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy and local excision: a multicentre observational study.

Authors:  Roberto Peltrini; Simone Castiglioni; Nicola Imperatore; Monica Ortenzi; Daniela Rega; Valentina Romeo; Valerio Caracino; Edoardo Liberatore; Massimo Basti; Emanuele Santoro; Umberto Bracale; Paolo Delrio; Felice Mucilli; Mario Guerrieri; Francesco Corcione
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.699

7.  P338: summarizing measures of proficiency in transanal total mesorectal excision-a systematic review.

Authors:  Alen Antoun; Johnny Chau; Nourah Alsharqawi; Pepa Kaneva; Liane S Feldman; Carmen L Mueller; Lawrence Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Education and Training in Transanal Endoscopic Surgery and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; F Borja de Lacy; Roel Hompes
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 9.  Current Challenges for Education and Training in Transanal Surgery.

Authors:  Meagan Costedio
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-03-29

10.  Transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a comparative study of long-term oncological outcomes.

Authors:  S Ourô; M Ferreira; P Roquete; R Maio
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.