Literature DB >> 35237104

Transanal Endoscopic Surgery: Who Should Be Doing This Procedure?

François Rouleau Fournier1, Carl James Brown1.   

Abstract

Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) was introduced in the 1980s, but more widely adopted in the late 2000s with innovations in instrumentation and training. Moreover, the global adoption of minimally invasive approaches to abdominal procedures has led to translatable skills for TES among colorectal and general surgeons. While there are similarities to laparoscopic surgery, TES has unique challenges related to the narrow confines of intraluminal surgery, angled instrumentation, and relatively uncommon indications limiting the opportunity to practice. The following review discusses the current evidence on TES learning curves, including potential limitations related to the broad adoption of TES by general surgeons. This article aims to provide general recommendations for the safe expansion of TES. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  TAMIS; TEM; TES; transanal endoscopic surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 35237104      PMCID: PMC8885151          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1742109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg        ISSN: 1530-9681


  33 in total

Review 1.  Statistical assessment of the learning curves of health technologies.

Authors:  C R Ramsay; A M Grant; S A Wallace; P H Garthwaite; A F Monk; I T Russell
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

Review 2.  Provider volume and outcomes for oncological procedures.

Authors:  S D Killeen; M J O'Sullivan; J C Coffey; W O Kirwan; H P Redmond
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills.

Authors:  Melina C Vassiliou; Liane S Feldman; Christopher G Andrew; Simon Bergman; Karen Leffondré; Donna Stanbridge; Gerald M Fried
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  [A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation].

Authors:  G Buess; F Hutterer; J Theiss; M Böbel; W Isselhard; H Pichlmaier
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Jane C Weeks; Heidi Nelson; Shari Gelber; Daniel Sargent; Georgene Schroeder
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-01-16       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer: the OSTRICH.

Authors:  David W Dietz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 7.  Learning curve for transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Antonio Maya; Andrew Vorenberg; Myrian Oviedo; Giovanna da Silva; Steven D Wexner; Dana Sands
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; W J Hoskins; M F Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-11-25       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Colorectal surgeons' learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  Renée M Barendse; Marcel G Dijkgraaf; Ursula R Rolf; Arnold B Bijnen; Esther C J Consten; Christiaan Hoff; Evelien Dekker; Paul Fockens; Willem A Bemelman; Eelco J R de Graaf
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.