Alen Antoun1, Johnny Chau1, Nourah Alsharqawi1, Pepa Kaneva1, Liane S Feldman1, Carmen L Mueller1, Lawrence Lee2. 1. Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre and the Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, QC, D16-116 H3G 1A4, Canada. 2. Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre and the Steinberg-Bernstein Centre for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Innovation, McGill University Health Centre, 1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, QC, D16-116 H3G 1A4, Canada. larry.lee@mcgill.ca.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is technically challenging even for experienced colorectal surgeons and there may be a higher risk of complications during learning. Determining when a surgeon is ready to safely perform this technique independently remains a matter of debate. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically summarize the available evidence regarding measures of proficiency in TaTME for rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed Epub records, Biosis previews, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All English and French language studies published between 2010 and 2018 that described proficiency metrics for TaTME were included. Study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, and therefore qualitative synthesis was performed. The primary outcomes were the methodology and measures used to define proficiency, and the number of cases needed to achieve proficiency. RESULTS: Of 994 citations, five studies met inclusion criteria. Of these, only two used objective measures to define proficiency. These studies evaluated patient outcomes and defined proficiency through cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of the primary outcome(s): post-operative complications and TME quality. Two studies reported expert consensus to establish recommendations using a combination of electronic survey distributed to colorectal surgeons and consensus conferences with TaTME experts from 7 to 8 different countries. One study defined the learning phase as 16 months of TaTME practice, or the first 27 cases. Stated case volumes needed to achieve proficiency varied widely. Studies using objective outcome measures reported threshold volumes of 40 and 51 cases, respectively, while expert consensus studies recommended needing 6-30 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Significant heterogeneity exists regarding the determination of proficiency benchmarks for TaTME. Expert consensus documents recommend lower case numbers to obtain proficiency than those defined by objective measures, suggesting greater experience may be required than generally thought.
INTRODUCTION: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is technically challenging even for experienced colorectal surgeons and there may be a higher risk of complications during learning. Determining when a surgeon is ready to safely perform this technique independently remains a matter of debate. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically summarize the available evidence regarding measures of proficiency in TaTME for rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed Epub records, Biosis previews, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All English and French language studies published between 2010 and 2018 that described proficiency metrics for TaTME were included. Study heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis, and therefore qualitative synthesis was performed. The primary outcomes were the methodology and measures used to define proficiency, and the number of cases needed to achieve proficiency. RESULTS: Of 994 citations, five studies met inclusion criteria. Of these, only two used objective measures to define proficiency. These studies evaluated patient outcomes and defined proficiency through cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis of the primary outcome(s): post-operative complications and TME quality. Two studies reported expert consensus to establish recommendations using a combination of electronic survey distributed to colorectal surgeons and consensus conferences with TaTME experts from 7 to 8 different countries. One study defined the learning phase as 16 months of TaTME practice, or the first 27 cases. Stated case volumes needed to achieve proficiency varied widely. Studies using objective outcome measures reported threshold volumes of 40 and 51 cases, respectively, while expert consensus studies recommended needing 6-30 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Significant heterogeneity exists regarding the determination of proficiency benchmarks for TaTME. Expert consensus documents recommend lower case numbers to obtain proficiency than those defined by objective measures, suggesting greater experience may be required than generally thought.
Authors: Marta Penna; Roel Hompes; Steve Arnold; Greg Wynn; Ralph Austin; Janindra Warusavitarne; Brendan Moran; George B Hanna; Neil J Mortensen; Paris P Tekkis Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: S C Abbott; A R L Stevenson; S W Bell; D Clark; A Merrie; J Hayes; S Ganesh; A G Heriot; S K Warrier Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: H H Wasmuth; A E Faerden; T Å Myklebust; F Pfeffer; S Norderval; R Riis; O C Olsen; J R Lambrecht; H Kørner; S G Larsen; H M Forsmo; O Baekkelund; S Lavik; J C Knapp; O Sjo; G Rashid Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Justin A Maykel; Uma R Phatak; Pasithorn A Suwanabol; Andrew T Schlussel; Jennifer S Davids; Paul R Sturrock; Karim Alavi Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2017-12 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Sam B Atallah; Arielle C DuBose; John P Burke; George Nassif; Teresa deBeche-Adams; Taylor Frering; Matthew R Albert; John R T Monson Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Hamzeh Naghawi; Johnny Chau; Amin Madani; Pepa Kaneva; John Monson; Carmen Mueller; Lawrence Lee Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2022-05-03 Impact factor: 3.699
Authors: Wang-Yong Zhu; Wing Shan Choi; May Chun Mei Wong; Jingya Jane Pu; Wei-Fa Yang; Yu-Xiong Su Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-09-16 Impact factor: 6.244