Literature DB >> 28776023

Nitroxide-Based Macromolecular Contrast Agents with Unprecedented Transverse Relaxivity and Stability for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Tumors.

Hung V-T Nguyen1, Qixian Chen1, Joseph T Paletta2, Peter Harvey1, Yivan Jiang1, Hui Zhang2, Michael D Boska3, M Francesca Ottaviani4, Alan Jasanoff1,1,1, Andrzej Rajca2, Jeremiah A Johnson1.   

Abstract

Metal-free magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) agents could overcome the established toxicity associated with metal-based agents in some patient populations and enable new modes of functional MRI in vivo. Herein, we report nitroxide-functionalized brush-arm star polymer organic radical contrast agents (BASP-ORCAs) that overcome the low contrast and poor in vivo stability associated with nitroxide-based MRI contrast agents. As a consequence of their unique nanoarchitectures, BASP-ORCAs possess per-nitroxide transverse relaxivities up to ∼44-fold greater than common nitroxides, exceptional stability in highly reducing environments, and low toxicity. These features combine to provide for accumulation of a sufficient concentration of BASP-ORCA in murine subcutaneous tumors up to 20 h following systemic administration such that MRI contrast on par with metal-based agents is observed. BASP-ORCAs are, to our knowledge, the first nitroxide MRI contrast agents capable of tumor imaging over long time periods using clinical high-field 1H MRI techniques.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28776023      PMCID: PMC5532724          DOI: 10.1021/acscentsci.7b00253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Cent Sci        ISSN: 2374-7943            Impact factor:   14.553


Introduction

Among the many imaging modalities for medical diagnostics, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most useful thanks to its ability to noninvasively generate three-dimensional detailed anatomical images with high spatial resolution while not requiring an ionizing source and remaining insensitive to depth.[1−4] Current clinical MRI methods depict the spatial distribution and chemical environment of water protons (1H) within a region of interest (ROI); to enhance the differences between native water 1H and ROIs, contrast agents are often employed. These contrast agents are divided into two primary classes: T1 contrast agents (e.g., paramagnetic metals such as gadolinium or manganese) that afford positive-contrast images primarily by locally reducing the water 1H longitudinal relaxation time (spin–lattice, T1), and T2 contrast agents (e.g., superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles) that afford negative-contrast images by locally reducing the water 1H transverse relaxation time (spin–spin, T2).[5,6] The corresponding water 1H relaxivities (r1 and r2, respectively) of a contrast agent characterize the extent to which the agent decreases the T1 and T2 times of water 1H. Contrast agents with greater r1 and r2 values provide increased image contrast compared to those with lower values at the same concentration.[6,7] Most MRI contrast agents with large r1 and/or r2 values contain metals that possess several unpaired electrons. For example, small molecule[8−13] and nanoparticle-based[14−21] contrast agents featuring Gd, Mn, Fe-oxide, and other metals have been reported to function as either T1 or T2 contrast agents or both. Furthermore, metal-based contrast agents that display advanced functions such as multimodal imaging,[8−10,12,13,17,20,21] enhanced target-specific accumulation,[14,18,19] and/or sensing[8,11−14] have been developed. Despite their unquestionable utility, metal-based contrast agents, especially nanoparticle ones that tend to accumulate in biological tissues, may present toxicity concerns in some patient populations. For example, Gd-based agents, perhaps the most widely used T1 contrast agents in the clinic, are associated with potentially lethal nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, and they have recently been linked to a rising prevalence of toxic Gd ions in the environment.[5,22−28] In addition, several T2 contrast agents based on Fe-nanoparticles have been stopped from further development or withdrawn from the market due to safety concerns.[29−32] Moreover, according to the FDA, Fe-based products including ferumoxytol (Feraheme), the only FDA-approved superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle currently available on the market, carry a risk of potentially life-threatening allergic reactions.[33−35] Thus, there is extensive interest in the development of “metal-free” MRI contrast agents that make use of entirely organic-based components. Such agents could enable MRI in at-risk patient populations, and they could potentially open new avenues for functional/responsive MRI based on in vivo organic transformations. Furthermore, organic nanoparticle contrast agents could provide safe alternatives in MR imaging applications that may require long-term tissue accumulation, such as tumor imaging. Four main classes of metal-free MRI contrast agents have been the most widely studied: paramagnetic nitroxide-based organic radical contrast agents (ORCAs), hyperpolarized 13C agents, 19F MRI contrast agents, and chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) contrast agents. While 19F MRI and CEST agents have undergone many advances in recent years,[36−43] these approaches often suffer from low sensitivity, and in some cases, require a high contrast agent concentration (10–50 mM), long imaging times, and/or potentially harmful high-intensity radio frequency fields. Hyperpolarized 13C agents, on the other hand, can theoretically afford up to 105 sensitivity improvements; nevertheless, issues including short hyperpolarization lifetimes that lead to limited imaging times, complexity in terms of the chemistry and instrumentation required for generation of the hyperpolarized agent, and a rather small substrate scope remain major challenges.[44−46] Furthermore, 19F MRI, CEST, and hyperpolarized 13C agents rely on imaging mechanisms that are not currently common in the clinic.[44−51] In contrast, nitroxide ORCAs rely on standard water relaxation mechanisms to achieve MRI contrast; they could in principle be immediately translated to clinical applications. However, several key challenges limit the clinical feasibility of nitroxide ORCAs. First, nitroxide radicals only possess one unpaired electron. As a result, compared to metal-based contrast agents such as Gd3+ (seven unpaired electrons) or Mn2+ (five unpaired electrons), nitroxide ORCAs inherently suffer from much lower water 1H relaxivity. One strategy to achieve higher molecular relaxivity is to use a poly(nitroxide) where the relatively low per nitroxide relaxivity is multiplied by the number of nitroxides bound to a polymer scaffold. The second major limitation of nitroxide ORCAs is that they are typically reduced rapidly in vivo (half-lives on the order of minutes) to diamagnetic hydroxylamines, thus rendering them ineffective as contrast agents shortly after injection.[52−55] Initial efforts to utilize nitroxides as MRI contrast agents exposed these shortcomings,[56,57] and though their rapid bioreduction has been cleverly exploited to enable redox-mapping in vitro and in vivo,[58−62] an in vivo-stable nitroxide ORCA that allows for longitudinal studies over clinically meaningful time scales following systemic administration has yet to be developed. Macromolecular nitroxide ORCAs with long-term in vivo stability could be particularly useful for tumor imaging. Nanoparticles of suitable size (∼10–200 nm) are known to passively accumulate in tumors, especially in murine models, via the enhanced permeation and retention effect, but hours to tens of hours are often needed to reach maximal accumulation.[63−69] To our knowledge, there are no nitroxide-based molecules or materials with demonstrated capability to provide in vivo MRI contrast after such long times. This problem is exacerbated in murine models where imaging is often used for preclinical studies of disease development: murine tissues contain higher levels of metabolic antioxidants, which lead to faster nitroxide reduction rates.[70,71] Thus, the development of stable nitroxide-based macromolecular ORCAs with high relaxivities could open a new arena of MRI applications, whereby the accumulation of contrast agents in diseased tissues could be monitored by MRI without off-site toxicity concerns.[55,72,73] Moreover, the synthetic versatility of polymeric materials could facilitate future image-guided drug delivery strategies. Herein, we report the design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a new class of nitroxide macromolecules—brush-arm star polymer ORCAs (BASP-ORCAs)—with unique structures that are designed to overcome the aforementioned challenges associated with tumor MRI with nitroxide-based contrast agents. BASP-ORCAs contain a high concentration of reduction-resistant nitroxide groups bound in an interlayer between a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) shell and a polyacetal core. Due to their shielded and dense nitroxide layer, yet hydrophilic PEGylated nanostructures, BASP-ORCAs simultaneously possess the highest known water 1H transverse relaxivities and stabilities for nitroxide ORCAs. In addition, the modularity of BASP synthesis was exploited to install near-infrared fluorophores into BASP-ORCAs and thereby achieve near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging in concert with MRI. Leveraging this combination of features, BASP-ORCAs were successfully employed for longitudinal MR and NIRF imaging of tumors with MRI contrast enhancement on par with metal-based contrast agents observed up to 1 day following systemic administration, which has, to our knowledge, never been achieved with a paramagnetic organic agent. Notably, though previous studies on nitroxide MRI contrast agents focused on T1-weighted imaging, BASP-ORCAs operate most effectively as T2 contrast agents, which is advantageous given that high-field instruments are being increasingly adopted in the clinic, and r2 often remains similar or increases with magnetic field strength.[74] Thus, BASP-ORCAs not only overcome the challenges that have plagued all previous nitroxide-based MRI contrast agents, and thereby facilitate the first longitudinal imaging of tumors with a nitroxide ORCA, but they are also naturally amenable to current and future clinical high-field MRI instruments.

Results and Discussion

BASP-ORCA Design and Synthesis

One of the most common ways to increase the relaxivity of MRI contrast agents (including nitroxides) involves attaching them to a rigid macromolecular scaffold.[6,47,52,53,75−78] For example, Rajca and co-workers appended a spirocyclohexyl nitroxide derivative (“chex”)[79] to the surface of dendrimers to produce chex-dendrimer ORCAs where the per-chexr1 was 0.42 mM–1 s–1 compared to r1 = 0.14 mM–1 s–1 for the model nitroxide 3-carboxy-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-l-pyrrolidinyloxy (3-CP).[52,53] In a later study, we appended chex to the core of PEGylated branched-bottlebrush polymers.[80] The resulting “chex-bottlebrush” had a per-chexr1 of 0.32 mM–1 s–1, which was approximately 50% greater than the chex-macromonomer used to synthesize these polymers (chex-MM, Figure a). In this system, r2 also increased from 0.30 mM–1 s–1 for chex-MM to 0.82 mM–1 s–1 for the chex-bottlebrush polymer, thus demonstrating that increasing the macromolecular size and chex density leads to increases in both r1 and r2, with a greater increase in r2.[80] In an effort to further increase these relaxivity values, we sought to incorporate chex into our BASP macromolecules wherein the nitroxides would be bound at a rigid core–shell interface.[80−83] On the basis of this novel structure compared to previous systems, we hypothesized that BASPs could provide enhanced relaxivity and nitroxide stability potentially making tumor imaging in vivo possible. Moreover, the control and robustness of BASP synthesis would enable the scalable production of BASP-ORCAs with optimal sizes for tumor accumulation, which is difficult with previous macromolecular systems such as dendrimers and bottlebrush polymers.[84−86]
Figure 1

(a) Chemical structures of BASP components studied in this work. (b) General brush-first ROMP procedure. Branched MMs chex-MM and Cy-MM are combined in the ratio j : 0.01j. This combination of MMs is exposed to 1.0 equiv of Grubbs III initiator to produce a living bottlebrush with an average degree of polymerization (DP) = j + 0.01j = m. N equiv of acetal-XL is then added (in aliquots of 5 equiv of acetal-XL every 5 min) to provide the final BASP-ORCA. The properties of the BASP-ORCAs are defined by their m and N values (Table ).

(a) Chemical structures of BASP components studied in this work. (b) General brush-first ROMP procedure. Branched MMs chex-MM and Cy-MM are combined in the ratio j : 0.01j. This combination of MMs is exposed to 1.0 equiv of Grubbs III initiator to produce a living bottlebrush with an average degree of polymerization (DP) = j + 0.01j = m. N equiv of acetal-XL is then added (in aliquots of 5 equiv of acetal-XL every 5 min) to provide the final BASP-ORCA. The properties of the BASP-ORCAs are defined by their m and N values (Table ).
Table 1

Characterization Data for BASP-ORCAs and Control Compounds

 composition
diameter
relaxivity
 
namemNDh/nmDTEM/nmr1/mM–1 s–1r2/mM–1 s–1notes
3-CPa    0.150.17 
chex-MMb    0.210.30 
chex-dendrimera    0.440.86 
chex-bottlebrushb55.55 17bn.d.0.320.82 
BASP-ORCA5.052031 ± 2n.d.0.276.92poor solubility (<10 mg/mL)
BASP-ORCA5.053049 ± 6n.d.0.537.11poor solubility (<10 mg/mL)
BASP-ORCA17.072031 ± 437 ± 70.414.67good solubility (>50 mg/mL)
BASP-ORCA7.073036 ± 3n.d.0.357.40poor solubility (<10 mg/mL)
BASP-ORCA9.991528 ± 338 ± 100.332.90low relaxivity
BASP-ORCA9.993033 ± 439 ± 100.374.52low relaxivity

From refs (52 and 53).

From ref (80).

BASP-ORCAs were synthesized by brush-first ring-opening metathesis polymerization (ROMP) as depicted in Figure .[84,86−88] Norbornene-based branched macromonomers (MMs, Figure a) featuring 3 kDa PEG and either chex (chex-MM) or Cy5.5 dye (Cy-MM, Figure a) were copolymerized by exposure to Grubbs third-generation bis-pyridine initiator[89] (Grubbs III, Figure a; reaction stoichiometry: j equiv. chex-MM to 0.01j Cy-MM to 1.0 Grubbs III) for 30 min (Figure b). The resulting living bottlebrush polymers with an average degree of polymerization (DP) of ∼j + 0.01j = m were then cross-linked via portionwise addition of N equiv of bis-norbornene acetal cross-linker acetal-XL(84) (Figure a) to the reaction mixture to generate the desired BASP-ORCA (Figure b). With this method, the BASP-ORCA size is determined by the MM to Grubbs III to acetal-XL ratios (i.e., m and N values). Much less Cy-MM (0.01j) relative to chex-MM (j) was used to bridge the difference in concentration requirements between MRI (mM to μM) and NIRF (nM to pM).[1,6] To identify optimal conditions for the synthesis of BASP-ORCAs with narrow size distributions and average diameters of ∼25–40 nm, as well as high water solubility and relaxivity, we screened m and N values from 5−10 and 15–30, respectively (Table ). Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) revealed nearly quantitative MM-to-bottlebrush conversion as well as ≥85% bottlebrush-to-BASP conversion for all m and N values (Figure S1). The BASP-ORCA diameters as determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) ranged from ∼28 to ∼49 nm (Table ). In general, for the same bottlebrush arm length (m), the BASP-ORCA size increased with the amount of acetal-XL added (N). In addition, the BASP-ORCA aqueous solubility (Table ) increased with m. A representative TEM image for the m = 7.07 and N = 20 BASP-ORCA (referred to as BASP-ORCA1 throughout the remainder of this work) is provided in Figure a. The aqueous solubility of BASP-ORCA1 was the highest amongst the BASP-ORCAs prepared, and its hydrodynamic diameter (Dh) of 31 ± 4 nm is suitable for extended in vivo circulation and tumor accumulation.[66−68]
Figure 2

(a) Transmission electron microscopy image of BASP-ORCA1 (DTEM = 37 ± 7 nm) after being negatively stained with uranyl acetate; the reported diameter (DTEM) represents the mean and standard deviation of >150 individual particle measurements. (b) Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra for BASP-ORCA1 and chex-MM. (c) T1 and T2-weighted MRI phantoms for BASP-ORCA1, chex-MM, PBS buffer, chex-bottlebrush, and a PEG-BASP lacking chex. The concentration of chex-containing samples (BASP-ORCA1, chex-MM, and chex-bottlebrush) ranges from 1 mM to 4 mM chex. The concentration of PEG-BASP lacking chex ranges from 6 mg/mL to 21 mg/mL, which is equivalent to the mass per volume concentration range of BASP-ORCA1.

From refs (52 and 53). From ref (80). (a) Transmission electron microscopy image of BASP-ORCA1 (DTEM = 37 ± 7 nm) after being negatively stained with uranyl acetate; the reported diameter (DTEM) represents the mean and standard deviation of >150 individual particle measurements. (b) Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra for BASP-ORCA1 and chex-MM. (c) T1 and T2-weighted MRI phantoms for BASP-ORCA1, chex-MM, PBS buffer, chex-bottlebrush, and a PEG-BASP lacking chex. The concentration of chex-containing samples (BASP-ORCA1, chex-MM, and chex-bottlebrush) ranges from 1 mM to 4 mM chex. The concentration of PEG-BASP lacking chex ranges from 6 mg/mL to 21 mg/mL, which is equivalent to the mass per volume concentration range of BASP-ORCA1.

Characterization of BASP-ORCA Magnetic Properties

Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR) was used to confirm the presence of chex in BASP-ORCAs, as well as to study the chex environment in BASP-ORCA1. The spin concentrations were ≥85% for all BASP-ORCAs. The height-normalized EPR spectra for BASP-ORCA1 and chex-MM[80] are shown in Figure b. The spectrum for BASP-ORCA1 is significantly broader than chex-MM, which is consistent with the larger and more rigid BASP nanostructure where chex is bound at the dense interface between the acetal cross-linker core and the PEG shell (Figures b and 2b). The BASP-ORCA1 spectrum was simulated using the procedure developed by Budil, Freed, and co-workers[90] (see Supporting Information section A for details), which allows for characterization of the chex mobility in terms of the correlation time for rotational diffusion (τ). The spectrum was best fitted by superimposing two computed components (Figure S3): 22% corresponded to a relatively fast-moving nitroxide with τ = 0.2 ns, while 78% corresponded to a slow-moving nitroxide with τ = 10.0 ns. The faster-moving component likely corresponds to nitroxides that are furthest from the BASP-ORCA1 acetal core (Figure b), while the slow-moving component corresponds to nitroxides that are close to and/or entangled within the acetal core. Notably, the τ of 10.0 ns measured for the slow component in BASP-ORCA1 is quite large, which suggests that a majority of the chex groups are in a rigid environment. For comparison, in our previously reported chex-dendrimer ORCAs,[52,53] TEMPO-labeled bottlebrush polymers,[81,82] and BASPs,[83] the largest τ measured was ∼1 ns. Next, we evaluated the longitudinal (r1) and transverse (r2) relaxivities of these BASP-ORCAs using a Bruker 7 T MRI scanner. The per-chexr1 values as a function of m and N (Table ) ranged from 0.27 to 0.53 mM–1 s–1; they were not significantly increased compared to Rajca’s chex-dendrimer and our chex-bottlebrush polymers. However, the per-chexr2 values ranged from 2.90 to 7.40 mM–1 s–1, which is ∼3.5- to ∼9.0-fold greater than the per-chexr2 in our chex-bottlebrush polymers and ∼17- to ∼44-fold greater than 3-CP (Table ).[80]BASP-ORCA1 displayed a per-chexr2 value of 4.67 mM–1 s–1. Though this value was not the highest we measured, we selected BASP-ORCA1 for translation to biological studies because it offered the best balance of high relaxivity, solubility (greater than 50 mg/mL, Table ), and size. Given the number-average molar mass of BASP-ORCA1 as determined by gel permeation chromatography and static light scattering (Mn = 4.75 × 105 g/mol, = 1.32), we estimate that each BASP-ORCA1 particle contains an average of 92 chex groups. Thus, the estimated average molecular r1 and r2 values for BASP-ORCA1 are 37.6 mM–1 s–1 and 428.8 mM–1 s–1, respectively, which are greater than those for the commonly used FDA-approved Gd-based contrast agent Magnevist (r1 = 3.1 mM–1 s–1 and r2 = 5.4 mM–1 s–1 at 7 T) and iron-based nanoparticles such as Feraheme (r1 = 3.1 mM–1 s–1 and r2 = 68 mM–1 s–1 at 7 T).[91−94] MR phantom images of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solutions of BASP-ORCA1, chex-MM, and our previously reported chex-bottlebrush polymer at various chex concentrations (from 1 mM−4 mM chex) as well as a PEG-BASP that lacks chex (at equivalent mass fractions to BASP-ORCA1) are provided in (Figure c), along with images for “blank” PBS buffer. The T1-weighted images for BASP-ORCA1, and chex-bottlebrush polymer are not obviously different, while the T2-weighted images clearly show a large reduction in signal for BASP-ORCA1. The PEG-BASP with no chex shows no difference in contrast as a function of concentration, which confirms that chex is required to observe changes in image contrast. The data presented above demonstrate that the high nitroxide density of BASP-ORCA1, which is a consequence of its unique cross-linked multilayer nanostructure, affords an increased magnetization capability that leads to r2 enhancement. This finding is consistent with reports where nitroxides are utilized as magnetic catalysts for outer-sphere relaxation processes.[95−97] Most importantly, the exceptionally high r2 of BASP-ORCA1 overcomes one of the major limitations of nitroxide-based contrast agents: inherently low contrast.

Ascorbate Quenching Kinetics of BASP-ORCAs

As discussed above, nitroxide-based ORCAs typically suffer from rapid reduction to diamagnetic hydroxylamines under biologically relevant conditions. Among the many potential biological reducing agents, ascorbate (Asc) is known to play a major role in in vivo nitroxide reduction,[54,98,99] and Asc-induced reduction can be amplified by glutathione (GSH).[80,99] We hypothesized that the rigid chex environment in our BASP-ORCAs could help to lower the rate of chex reduction. To test this hypothesis, we collected EPR spectra for BASP-ORCA1 at various times following exposure to 20 equiv of Asc and 20 equiv of GSH per nitroxide (both reagents were present in 10 mM concentrations). EPR spectra collected 1, 40, and 180 min after exposure to these conditions are provided in Figure a. The changes in peak height as a function of time are indicative of nitroxide reduction. The normalized peak height of the EPR spectra are plotted versus time in Figure b. Reduction kinetics data for our previous chex-bottlebrush polymers and chex-MM are provided for comparison.[80] In contrast to the chex-bottlebrush and chex-MM samples, which both display an initial rapid chex reduction phase in the first hour, the reduction of chex in BASP-ORCA1 was significantly retarded with nearly 85% remaining after 1 h, and 70% remaining after 3 h (compared to 65% and 57%, respectively, for the chex-bottlebrush). On the basis of the integrated peak heights as a function of time, the second-order rate constants for BASP-ORCA1 reduction in the initial (first 10 min) and late (>1 h) stages of the reduction process were calculated: kearly = 0.0376 M–1 s–1 and klate ≈ 0.00672 M–1 s–1) (Table S1).[52,53,80] Simulations revealed that the EPR spectra collected during the reduction process consisted of a “fast” and a “slow” component (Figure S3). Interestingly, τ for the “fast” component remained constant at 0.2 ns, while τ for the “slow” component became increasingly larger with time (11.0 ns at 40 min and 13.2 ns at 180 min). Therefore, even after 3 h there persists an extremely reduction resistant and slow moving nitroxide population. The presence of these very stable nitroxides within BASP-ORCA1 may enable T2-weighted MRI over longer time scales than have been possible with previous nitroxide contrast agents (vide infra).
Figure 3

(a) EPR spectra for BASP-ORCA1 1, 40, and 180 min following exposure to 20 equiv of sodium ascorbate (Asc) per nitroxide. (b) Ascorbate reduction kinetics for BASP-ORCA1, chex-bottlebrush, and chex-MM. (c) Cy5.5 emission at 700 nm in response to Asc and glutathione (GSH); the reported values represent the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 3).

(a) EPR spectra for BASP-ORCA1 1, 40, and 180 min following exposure to 20 equiv of sodium ascorbate (Asc) per nitroxide. (b) Ascorbate reduction kinetics for BASP-ORCA1, chex-bottlebrush, and chex-MM. (c) Cy5.5 emission at 700 nm in response to Asc and glutathione (GSH); the reported values represent the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 3).

Fluorescence Properties of BASP-ORCAs

As noted above, Cy5.5 was also incorporated into these BASP-ORCAs (see Figure S4 for BASP-ORCA1 absorption and emission spectra confirming the presence of Cy5.5) in order to simultaneously use NIRF as an imaging modality for comparison to MRI. Nitroxides are well-known to quench fluorescence via catalysis of nonemissive photophysical processes such as intersystem crossing. This quenching requires close interaction between the nitroxide and the fluorophore; the systems with the greatest quenching typically feature the nitroxide directly linked to the fluorophore via π bonds (i.e., electronic conjugation).[100−102] Given the fact that chex and Cy5.5 are incorporated into BASP-ORCAs via two different macromonomers and that the mobility of chex is limited in these constructs, we reasoned that Cy5.5 quenching would be minimal; therefore, we could potentially use Cy5.5 emission as a fairly constant descriptor of particle concentration regardless of the extent of chex reduction. To test this hypothesis, we exposed BASP-ORCA1 to a large excess of Asc (40–120 equiv. to chex) in water, and monitored the resulting Cy5.5 emission. In agreement with our expectation, only a 25 ± 2% to 30 ± 2% increase in fluorescence emission was observed (Figure c). Moreover, addition of GSH (60 equiv) as a coreductant along with 60 equiv of Asc gave only a 35 ± 7% increase in fluorescence. Taken together, these data suggest that Cy5.5 fluorescence is minimally quenched by chex in BASP-ORCA1. For comparison, exposure of our previously reported chex-bottlebrush polymer containing Cy5.5 to excess Asc or Asc+GSH led to 119 ± 5% and 250 ± 5% increases in fluorescence, respectively.[80] Notably, the time required to achieve a fluorescence plateau varied significantly between BASP-ORCA1 (approximately 40 min) and our chex-bottlebrush polymer (a few minutes). Collectively, these data suggest that the BASP nanostructure provides greater steric shielding and isolation of chex and Cy5.5 compared to the chex-bottlebrush polymer.

In Vitro Cytotoxicity and in Vivo Gross Toxicity, Pharmacokinetics (PK), and Biodistribution (BD) of BASP-ORCA1 in Non-Tumor-Bearing Mice

Next, we investigated the performance of BASP-ORCA1 in biological assays. As discussed above, one potential advantage of ORCAs is their low toxicity. To assess the toxicity of BASP-ORCA1, we first conducted in vitro human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) and HeLa cell viability assays. In these assays, the cells were incubated with varied concentrations of BASP-ORCA1 for 72 h. Cell viability was determined by the CellTiter-Glo assay (Supplemental Figure S5). The half-maximal inhibitory concentrations of BASP-ORCA1, i.e., the concentrations that led to 50% cell death, were 1.5 mg/mL (280 μM chex) and 4.5 mg/mL (830 μM chex) in HUVEC and HeLa cells, respectively. These results confirm that BASP-ORCA1 induces negligible in vitro cytotoxicity at practical concentrations.[85,86] Next, the in vivo gross toxicity of BASP-ORCA1 was assessed. Healthy BALB/c mice were administered increasing doses (from 5 to 30 mg or 0.2 to 1.5 g/kg, respectively) of BASP-ORCA1 via tail vein injection. The animal body masses and behaviors were monitored over the course of 30 days. Loss of ≥10% body mass is generally considered to be a sign of unacceptable toxicity.[103,104] As shown in Figure S6, even the highest dose of BASP-ORCA1 (administered to n = 4 animals) induced no significant decrease in body mass, which suggests that these particles are well-tolerated up to their solubility-limiting dose. The pharmacokinetics (PK) and biodistribution (BD) of BASP-ORCA1 were monitored in healthy, nontumor bearing BALB/c mice (n = 3) using NIRF imaging (IVIS, Cy5.5 λex/λem = 640/700 nm). For PK analysis, blood samples were collected via cardiac puncture at various time points from 1 to 48 h. Percent injected dose was plotted as a function of time (Figure S7a). As is common for spherical PEGylated nanostructures, BASP-ORCA1 exhibited a two-phase clearance behavior, with an early distribution phase of ∼6 h, followed by a steady elimination phase.[67,86] Fitting the data presented in Figure S7a with a standard two-compartment model yielded a blood compartment half-life for BASP-ORCA1 of 10 h.[105] This long half-life is attributed to the nanoscale size of BASP-ORCA1, which limits renal clearance, and its PEGylated corona.[66,69] Consistent with these results and a plethora of studies on PEGylated nanoparticles,[65−69] BD analysis revealed that a majority of BASP-ORCA1 accumulated in the liver, with increasing accumulation over 72 h (Figure S7b). Less accumulation in the kidney and negligible accumulation in other tissues was observed. Fluorescence in extracted lung tissue is attributed to a high concentration of BASP-ORCA1 in the blood. Notably, fluorescence images of fecal samples (Figure S7c) suggest that BASP-ORCA1 is ultimately cleared from the body via excretion.

BASP-ORCA1 BD in Tumor-Bearing Mice

Given the long circulation of BASP-ORCA1, we hypothesized that this particle would passively accumulate in subcutaneous tumors following systemic injection. To test this hypothesis, we first established a tumor model via subcutaneous injection of a mixture of 2.0 × 106 lung carcinoma cells (A549, ATCC), Matrigel, and PBS buffer into a hind flank of NCR-NU mice (n = 4). When the average tumor volume was ∼1 cm, BASP-ORCA1 was administered at a dose of 0.23 mmol chex/kg (1.2 g BASP-ORCA1/kg) via tail vein injection. NIRF images collected 20 h after administration indicated substantial tumor accumulation of BASP-ORCA1, which is consistent with other reports for PEGylated nanoparticles of similar size including our related drug-conjugated BASPs (Figure a).[65,66,69,86]Ex vivo BD data were consistent with our studies on nontumor bearing BALB/c mice (i.e., liver accumulation and persistence in blood) with the addition of significant tumor accumulation (Figure b and Figure S8).
Figure 4

(a) In vivo NIRF images of NCR nude mouse before and 20 h after injection of BASP-ORCA1 (see Supporting Information for details). (b) Ex vivo NIRF images of selected organs (see Supporting Information for details). Units of radiant efficiency: .

(a) In vivo NIRF images of NCR nude mouse before and 20 h after injection of BASP-ORCA1 (see Supporting Information for details). (b) Ex vivo NIRF images of selected organs (see Supporting Information for details). Units of radiant efficiency: .

MRI and NIRF Imaging with BASP-ORCA1 in Tumor-Bearing Mice

The low toxicity, long circulation half-life, and tumor accumulation of BASP-ORCA1, along with its exceptional stability and relaxivity, suggested that this particle could be suitable for MRI of tumors following systemic injection and accumulation; a feat that, to our knowledge, has not yet been achieved with ORCAs. Two groups of A459 tumor-bearing NCR-NU mice were administered different doses of BASP-ORCA1 via tail-vein injection: the “low dose” group (n = 3) received 0.16 mmol chex/kg (0.8 g BASP-ORCA1/kg), while the “high dose” group (n = 4) received 0.23 mmol chex/kg (1.2 g BASP-ORCA1/kg). The mice were anaesthetized and MR images were collected at various time points: 12, 16, and 20 h postinjection for the low dose group and 20 h postinjection for the high dose group. The images from each time point were compared to images collected before BASP-ORCA1 injection. Figures a shows T2-weighted false-colored images for a selected mouse from the low dose group imaged before BASP-ORCA1 injection (top row of images) and 20 h (bottom row of images) after BASP-ORCA1 injection. From left-to-right the images correspond to progressive slices of the same animal in the z-axis with the tumor indicated with a yellow arrow in each image. Figure b shows an analogous set of images for a selected mouse from the high dose group. Contrast differences between the preinjection and postinjection images can be observed at both dose levels, with greater contrast observed in the high dose animal (Figure b). Whole animal images similarly revealed a clear difference in tumor contrast (Figure c, yellow arrows).
Figure 5

(a) T2-weighted MR images of tumor bearing NCR nude mouse before (top row) and 20 h after (bottom row) injection of 0.16 mmol chex/kg (“low dose”) of BASP-ORCA1. Each series of images corresponds to progressive slices in the z-axis through the tumor of the same mouse. (b) T2-weighted MR images of tumor bearing NCR nude mouse before (top row) and 20 h after (bottom row) injection of 0.23 mmol chex/kg (“high dose”) of BASP-ORCA1. Each series of images corresponds to progressive slices in the z-axis through the tumor of the same mouse. (c) T2-weighted coronal MR images before (top) and 20 h after (bottom) injection of 0.23 mmol chex/kg (“high dose”) of BASP-ORCA1. (d) Percent MRI contrast change at various times following BASP-ORCA1 injection compared to preinjection. Statistical comparisons (n = 3 for low dose group; n = 4 for high dose group; reported values represent mean ± SEM) to preinjection images were made with a student t test: **P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001.

(a) T2-weighted MR images of tumor bearing NCR nude mouse before (top row) and 20 h after (bottom row) injection of 0.16 mmol chex/kg (“low dose”) of BASP-ORCA1. Each series of images corresponds to progressive slices in the z-axis through the tumor of the same mouse. (b) T2-weighted MR images of tumor bearing NCR nude mouse before (top row) and 20 h after (bottom row) injection of 0.23 mmol chex/kg (“high dose”) of BASP-ORCA1. Each series of images corresponds to progressive slices in the z-axis through the tumor of the same mouse. (c) T2-weighted coronal MR images before (top) and 20 h after (bottom) injection of 0.23 mmol chex/kg (“high dose”) of BASP-ORCA1. (d) Percent MRI contrast change at various times following BASP-ORCA1 injection compared to preinjection. Statistical comparisons (n = 3 for low dose group; n = 4 for high dose group; reported values represent mean ± SEM) to preinjection images were made with a student t test: **P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001. The percent negative contrast enhancement (i.e., the amount of signal reduction) before and after BASP-ORCA1 administration was quantified by image analysis (Figure d). Signal reductions ranging from 14 ± 2% to 16 ± 2% (P ≤ 0.05) were observed for the 12 to 20 h time points in the low dose group (Figure d, red bars). In the high dose group, a 24 ± 2% (P ≤ 0.001) signal reduction was observed 20 h after BASP-ORCA1 administration (Figure d, blue bar). The BASP-ORCA1 dose–response effect suggests that the observed contrast differences between pre- and postinjection are due to accumulation of BASP-ORCA1 in the tumors. Keeping in mind that MRI phantoms revealed no observable contrast enhancement for PEG-BASPs that lack chex (Figure c), these MRI data imply that 20 h following injection there is a sufficient concentration of chex radicals present on the BASP-ORCA1 in the tumor to impart contrast. To confirm the presence of chex radicals in the tumors, the same mice that were imaged by MRI were sacrificed 21 h after BASP-ORCA1 administration and their tissue homogenates and blood were analyzed by EPR spectroscopy (Figure a). From these spectra, the radical concentration per gram of protein in each tissue sample, the latter obtained via a bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA), was evaluated and normalized by the radical concentration per gram of protein in muscle tissue (Figure b). In agreement with our MRI data, the concentration of free radicals in the tumor was quite high after BASP-ORCA1 injection; the measured value of 0.25 ± 0.04 μmol chex/g chex/g of protein corresponds to 4.5% of the injected dose of chex radicals. Moreover, consistent with our in vivo NIRF imaging results (vide supra), relatively high radical concentrations were observed in the liver and kidney, which suggests that the clearance of BASP-ORCA1 proceeded mostly through these organs. Notably, the murine liver contains a high concentration of Asc (millimolar range); our observation of radicals in the liver is further evidence of the extremely stable nature of the chex units in BASP-ORCA1 (Note: in our previous chex-bottlebrush polymers, there was very little chex radical in the liver following 30 min and none observed after 24 h). A high chex concentration was also observed in the heart, which is in accord with a long blood compartment half-life and is consistent with our PK data obtained by NIRF imaging. Finally, NIRF imaging of these homogenates provided fluorescence radiant efficiencies that were in good agreement with our spin concentrations (Figure b), which suggests that the chex radicals and Cy5.5 dyes are still colocalized within the BASP-ORCA1 construct after biodistribution. Unlike our previous chex-bottlebrush polymers, which displayed dramatic increases in fluorescence as chex was reduced, the signal uniformity offered by BASP-ORCA1 provides for straightforward multimodal confirmation of BD.
Figure 6

(a) EPR spectra obtained for homogenized tissue samples collected for the same mice imaged in Figure 22 h following BASP-ORCA1 injection. (b) Blue: Muscle-normalized concentration of chex per gram of protein as obtained from EPR double integration of tissue homogenates. Red: Muscle-normalized concentration of Cy5.5 in tissue homogenates as obtained from NIRF imaging. Statistical comparisons (n = 4; reported values represent mean ± SEM) to muscle signal were made with a Student’s t test: *not significant, **P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001.

(a) EPR spectra obtained for homogenized tissue samples collected for the same mice imaged in Figure 22 h following BASP-ORCA1 injection. (b) Blue: Muscle-normalized concentration of chex per gram of protein as obtained from EPR double integration of tissue homogenates. Red: Muscle-normalized concentration of Cy5.5 in tissue homogenates as obtained from NIRF imaging. Statistical comparisons (n = 4; reported values represent mean ± SEM) to muscle signal were made with a Student’s t test: *not significant, **P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001. To the best of our knowledge, BASP-ORCA1 is the first nitroxide MRI contrast agent capable of providing significant contrast 20 h after injection, which is a testament to its unique structural features that combine optimal size for tumor accumulation with a high nitroxide density and stability. To set these results in context, we compared our data to recent literature examples of MRI-contrast agents that rely on metals to achieve tumor imaging following systemic administration. For example, Kataoka and co-workers recently reported on a new class of Gd-based nanoparticles (T1 contrast agents) for MRI of tumors. In their study, a ∼40% contrast enhancement (at 0.05 mmol Gd/kg iv dose) was observed 4 h following injection into mice bearing subcutaneous C26 tumors. Notably, the commercially available small molecule contrast agent Gd-DTPA exhibited negligible contrast enhancement (at 0.23 mmol Gd/kg iv dose) after 4 h.[16] This example highlights the importance of a nanoparticle system for extended circulation and tumor imaging. The same group reported Fe-based nanoparticles (T2 contrast agents) for tumor imaging in a similar murine model (subcutaneous C26 tumors). Here, an approximately 25% contrast difference was observed 24 h following intravenous administration of 0.45 mg Fe/kg. Notably, less than 10% contrast enhancement was observed using commercially available Resovist (at 0.45 mg Fe/kg intravenous dose).[15] It should be noted that the instrument parameters used to obtain T2-weighted images in this work were similar to those used above in our studies; thus, our results for BASP-ORCA1 are on par with recently reported nanoparticle MRI contrast agents that rely on metals to achieve contrast.

Conclusion

We have developed a nitroxide-based macromolecular MRI contrast agent —BASP-ORCA1— that enables simultaneous MRI and NIRF imaging in vivo over time scales suitable for tumor imaging following systemic injection. BASP-ORCA1 addresses the two major challenges that have historically limited nitroxide-based organic radical contrast agents for MRI: low relaxivity and poor stability. These functions were made possible by the brush-arm star polymer (BASP) nanostructure, which places a dense layer of chex nitroxides at the interface between a rigid poly(acetal) core and a hydrophilic PEG shell. Altogether, BASP-ORCA1 displayed unprecedented per-nitroxide and per-molecule transverse relaxivities for organic radical contrast agents, exceptional stability, high water solubility, low in vitro and in vivo toxicity, and a long blood compartment half-life. These features combined to facilitate the imaging of subcutaneous tumors in mice 20 h after tail-vein injection, providing contrast enhancements on par with commercial and literature examples of metal-based contrast agents. This work suggests that organic radicals can be viable alternatives to metal-based MRI contrast agents, and sets the stage for the development of theranostic systems that combine organic radical contrast agents with therapeutic payloads to achieve simultaneous tumor imaging and drug delivery without concerns over long-term tissue accumulation of metals.
  94 in total

Review 1.  The unique role of nanoparticles in nanomedicine: imaging, drug delivery and therapy.

Authors:  Tennyson L Doane; Clemens Burda
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 54.564

2.  Current status of superparamagnetic iron oxide contrast agents for liver magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yi-Xiang J Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Development of a T1 contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging using MnO nanoparticles.

Authors:  Hyon Bin Na; Jung Hee Lee; Kwangjin An; Yong Il Park; Mihyun Park; In Su Lee; Do-Hyun Nam; Sung Tae Kim; Seung-Hoon Kim; Sang-Wook Kim; Keun-Ho Lim; Ki-Soo Kim; Sun-Ok Kim; Taeghwan Hyeon
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Exceedingly small iron oxide nanoparticles as positive MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  He Wei; Oliver T Bruns; Michael G Kaul; Eric C Hansen; Mariya Barch; Agata Wiśniowska; Ou Chen; Yue Chen; Nan Li; Satoshi Okada; Jose M Cordero; Markus Heine; Christian T Farrar; Daniel M Montana; Gerhard Adam; Harald Ittrich; Alan Jasanoff; Peter Nielsen; Moungi G Bawendi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  One-Component Supramolecular Filament Hydrogels as Theranostic Label-Free Magnetic Resonance Imaging Agents.

Authors:  Lye Lin Lock; Yuguo Li; Xinpei Mao; Hanwei Chen; Verena Staedtke; Renyuan Bai; Wang Ma; Ran Lin; Yi Li; Guanshu Liu; Honggang Cui
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 15.881

6.  Pediatric nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is rarely reported: a RADAR report.

Authors:  Beatrice Nardone; Elise Saddleton; Anne E Laumann; Beatrice J Edwards; Dennis W Raisch; June M McKoy; Steven M Belknap; Christian Bull; Anand Haryani; Shawn E Cowper; Ali K Abu-Alfa; Frank H Miller; Victoria Godinez-Puig; Vikas R Dharnidharka; Dennis P West
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-09-21

7.  A novel nitroxide is an effective brain redox imaging contrast agent and in vivo radioprotector.

Authors:  Ryan M Davis; Anastasia L Sowers; William DeGraff; Marcelino Bernardo; Angela Thetford; Murali C Krishna; James B Mitchell
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 7.376

8.  EPR study of spin labeled brush polymers in organic solvents.

Authors:  Yan Xia; Yongjun Li; Alan O Burts; M Francesca Ottaviani; David A Tirrell; Jeremiah A Johnson; Nicholas J Turro; Robert H Grubbs
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  DNA-gadolinium-gold nanoparticles for in vivo T1 MR imaging of transplanted human neural stem cells.

Authors:  Francesca J Nicholls; Matthew W Rotz; Harmanvir Ghuman; Keith W MacRenaris; Thomas J Meade; Michel Modo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 12.479

10.  Multimeric Near IR-MR Contrast Agent for Multimodal In Vivo Imaging.

Authors:  Victoria S R Harrison; Christiane E Carney; Keith W MacRenaris; Emily A Waters; Thomas J Meade
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  28 in total

1.  Reduction kinetics and electrochemistry of tetracarboxylate nitroxides.

Authors:  Shengdian Huang; Hui Zhang; Joseph T Paletta; Suchada Rajca; Andrzej Rajca
Journal:  Free Radic Res       Date:  2018-02-27

Review 2.  A guide to maximizing the therapeutic potential of protein-polymer conjugates by rational design.

Authors:  Jeong Hoon Ko; Heather D Maynard
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 54.564

Review 3.  A Review of the Current Evidence on Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain.

Authors:  Richard Pullicino; Mark Radon; Shubhabrata Biswas; Maneesh Bhojak; Kumar Das
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Brush-First and ROMP-Out with Functional (Macro)monomers: Method Development, Structural Investigations, and Applications of an Expanded Brush-Arm Star Polymer Platform.

Authors:  Matthew R Golder; Hung V-T Nguyen; Nathan J Oldenhuis; Julian Grundler; Ellane J Park; Jeremiah A Johnson
Journal:  Macromolecules       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 5.985

5.  Scalable Synthesis of Multivalent Macromonomers for ROMP.

Authors:  Hung V-T Nguyen; Nolan M Gallagher; Farrukh Vohidov; Yivan Jiang; Ken Kawamoto; Hui Zhang; Jiwon V Park; Zhihao Huang; M Francesca Ottaviani; Andrzej Rajca; Jeremiah A Johnson
Journal:  ACS Macro Lett       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 6.903

Review 6.  Chemistry of MRI Contrast Agents: Current Challenges and New Frontiers.

Authors:  Jessica Wahsner; Eric M Gale; Aurora Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Nitroxyl Modified Tobacco Mosaic Virus as a Metal-Free High-Relaxivity MRI and EPR Active Superoxide Sensor.

Authors:  Madushani Dharmarwardana; André F Martins; Zhuo Chen; Philip M Palacios; Chance M Nowak; Raymond P Welch; Shaobo Li; Michael A Luzuriaga; Leonidas Bleris; Brad S Pierce; A Dean Sherry; Jeremiah J Gassensmith
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 8.  Probing the brain with molecular fMRI.

Authors:  Souparno Ghosh; Peter Harvey; Jacob C Simon; Alan Jasanoff
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Triply Loaded Nitroxide Brush-Arm Star Polymers Enable Metal-Free Millimetric Tumor Detection by Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Hung V-T Nguyen; Alexandre Detappe; Nolan M Gallagher; Hui Zhang; Peter Harvey; Changcun Yan; Clelia Mathieu; Matthew R Golder; Yivan Jiang; Maria Francesca Ottaviani; Alan Jasanoff; Andrzej Rajca; Irene Ghobrial; P Peter Ghoroghchian; Jeremiah A Johnson
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 15.881

10.  Manganese-Based Contrast Agents for Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Liver Tumors: Structure-Activity Relationships and Lead Candidate Evaluation.

Authors:  Junfeng Wang; Huan Wang; Ian A Ramsay; Derek J Erstad; Bryan C Fuchs; Kenneth K Tanabe; Peter Caravan; Eric M Gale
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 7.446

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.