Hung V-T Nguyen1, Qixian Chen1, Joseph T Paletta2, Peter Harvey1, Yivan Jiang1, Hui Zhang2, Michael D Boska3, M Francesca Ottaviani4, Alan Jasanoff1,1,1, Andrzej Rajca2, Jeremiah A Johnson1. 1. Department of Chemistry, Department of Biological Engineering, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, and Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, United States. 2. Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588, United States. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska 68198, United States. 4. Department of Pure and Applied Sciences, University of Urbino, Urbino 61029, Italy.
Abstract
Metal-free magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) agents could overcome the established toxicity associated with metal-based agents in some patient populations and enable new modes of functional MRI in vivo. Herein, we report nitroxide-functionalized brush-arm star polymer organic radical contrast agents (BASP-ORCAs) that overcome the low contrast and poor in vivo stability associated with nitroxide-based MRI contrast agents. As a consequence of their unique nanoarchitectures, BASP-ORCAs possess per-nitroxide transverse relaxivities up to ∼44-fold greater than common nitroxides, exceptional stability in highly reducing environments, and low toxicity. These features combine to provide for accumulation of a sufficient concentration of BASP-ORCA in murine subcutaneous tumors up to 20 h following systemic administration such that MRI contrast on par with metal-based agents is observed. BASP-ORCAs are, to our knowledge, the first nitroxide MRI contrast agents capable of tumor imaging over long time periods using clinical high-field 1H MRI techniques.
Metal-free magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) agents could overcome the established toxicity associated with metal-based agents in some patient populations and enable new modes of functional MRI in vivo. Herein, we report nitroxide-functionalized brush-arm star polymer organic radical contrast agents (BASP-ORCAs) that overcome the low contrast and poor in vivo stability associated with nitroxide-based MRI contrast agents. As a consequence of their unique nanoarchitectures, BASP-ORCAs possess per-nitroxide transverse relaxivities up to ∼44-fold greater than common nitroxides, exceptional stability in highly reducing environments, and low toxicity. These features combine to provide for accumulation of a sufficient concentration of BASP-ORCA in murinesubcutaneous tumors up to 20 h following systemic administration such that MRI contrast on par with metal-based agents is observed. BASP-ORCAs are, to our knowledge, the first nitroxide MRI contrast agents capable of tumor imaging over long time periods using clinical high-field 1H MRI techniques.
Among the many imaging
modalities for medical diagnostics, magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) is one of the most useful thanks to its ability
to noninvasively generate three-dimensional detailed anatomical images
with high spatial resolution while not requiring an ionizing source
and remaining insensitive to depth.[1−4] Current clinical MRI methods depict the
spatial distribution and chemical environment of water protons (1H) within a region of interest (ROI); to enhance the differences
between native water 1H and ROIs, contrast agents are often
employed. These contrast agents are divided into two primary classes: T1 contrast agents (e.g., paramagnetic metals
such as gadolinium or manganese) that afford positive-contrast images
primarily by locally reducing the water 1H longitudinal
relaxation time (spin–lattice, T1), and T2 contrast agents (e.g., superparamagnetic
iron oxide nanoparticles) that afford negative-contrast images by
locally reducing the water 1H transverse relaxation time
(spin–spin, T2).[5,6] The
corresponding water 1H relaxivities (r1 and r2, respectively) of
a contrast agent characterize the extent to which the agent decreases
the T1 and T2 times of water 1H. Contrast agents with greater r1 and r2 values
provide increased image contrast compared to those with lower values
at the same concentration.[6,7]Most MRI contrast
agents with large r1 and/or r2 values contain metals that
possess several unpaired electrons. For example, small molecule[8−13] and nanoparticle-based[14−21] contrast agents featuring Gd, Mn, Fe-oxide, and other metals have
been reported to function as either T1 or T2 contrast agents or both. Furthermore,
metal-based contrast agents that display advanced functions such as
multimodal imaging,[8−10,12,13,17,20,21] enhanced target-specific accumulation,[14,18,19] and/or sensing[8,11−14] have been developed. Despite their unquestionable utility, metal-based
contrast agents, especially nanoparticle ones that tend to accumulate
in biological tissues, may present toxicity concerns in some patient
populations. For example, Gd-based agents, perhaps the most widely
used T1 contrast agents in the clinic,
are associated with potentially lethal nephrogenic systemic fibrosis,
and they have recently been linked to a rising prevalence of toxic
Gd ions in the environment.[5,22−28] In addition, several T2 contrast agents
based on Fe-nanoparticles have been stopped from further development
or withdrawn from the market due to safety concerns.[29−32] Moreover, according to the FDA, Fe-based products including ferumoxytol
(Feraheme), the only FDA-approved superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle
currently available on the market, carry a risk of potentially life-threatening
allergic reactions.[33−35] Thus, there is extensive interest in the development
of “metal-free” MRI contrast agents that make use of
entirely organic-based components. Such agents could enable MRI in
at-risk patient populations, and they could potentially open new avenues
for functional/responsive MRI based on in vivo organic
transformations. Furthermore, organic nanoparticle contrast agents
could provide safe alternatives in MR imaging applications that may
require long-term tissue accumulation, such as tumor imaging.Four main classes of metal-free MRI contrast agents have been the
most widely studied: paramagnetic nitroxide-based organic radical
contrast agents (ORCAs), hyperpolarized 13C agents, 19F MRI contrast agents, and chemical exchange saturation transfer
(CEST) contrast agents. While 19F MRI and CEST agents have
undergone many advances in recent years,[36−43] these approaches often suffer from low sensitivity, and in some
cases, require a high contrast agent concentration (10–50 mM),
long imaging times, and/or potentially harmful high-intensity radio
frequency fields. Hyperpolarized 13C agents, on the other
hand, can theoretically afford up to 105 sensitivity improvements;
nevertheless, issues including short hyperpolarization lifetimes that
lead to limited imaging times, complexity in terms of the chemistry
and instrumentation required for generation of the hyperpolarized
agent, and a rather small substrate scope remain major challenges.[44−46] Furthermore, 19F MRI, CEST, and hyperpolarized 13C agents rely on imaging mechanisms that are not currently common
in the clinic.[44−51] In contrast, nitroxideORCAs rely on standard water relaxation mechanisms
to achieve MRI contrast; they could in principle be immediately translated
to clinical applications. However, several key challenges limit the
clinical feasibility of nitroxideORCAs. First, nitroxide radicals
only possess one unpaired electron. As a result, compared to metal-based
contrast agents such as Gd3+ (seven unpaired electrons)
or Mn2+ (five unpaired electrons), nitroxideORCAs inherently
suffer from much lower water 1H relaxivity. One strategy
to achieve higher molecular relaxivity is to use a poly(nitroxide)
where the relatively low per nitroxide relaxivity is multiplied by
the number of nitroxides bound to a polymer scaffold. The second major
limitation of nitroxideORCAs is that they are typically reduced rapidly in vivo (half-lives on the order of minutes) to diamagnetic
hydroxylamines, thus rendering them ineffective as contrast agents
shortly after injection.[52−55] Initial efforts to utilize nitroxides as MRI contrast
agents exposed these shortcomings,[56,57] and though
their rapid bioreduction has been cleverly exploited to enable redox-mapping in vitro and in vivo,[58−62] an in vivo-stable nitroxide ORCA
that allows for longitudinal studies over clinically meaningful time
scales following systemic administration has yet to be developed.Macromolecular nitroxideORCAs with long-term in vivo stability could be particularly useful for tumor imaging. Nanoparticles
of suitable size (∼10–200 nm) are known to passively
accumulate in tumors, especially in murine models, via the enhanced
permeation and retention effect, but hours to tens of hours are often
needed to reach maximal accumulation.[63−69] To our knowledge, there are no nitroxide-based molecules or materials
with demonstrated capability to provide in vivo MRI
contrast after such long times. This problem is exacerbated in murine
models where imaging is often used for preclinical studies of disease
development: murine tissues contain higher levels of metabolic antioxidants,
which lead to faster nitroxide reduction rates.[70,71] Thus, the development of stable nitroxide-based macromolecular ORCAs
with high relaxivities could open a new arena of MRI applications,
whereby the accumulation of contrast agents in diseased tissues could
be monitored by MRI without off-site toxicity concerns.[55,72,73] Moreover, the synthetic versatility
of polymeric materials could facilitate future image-guided drug delivery
strategies.Herein, we report the design, synthesis, and biological
evaluation
of a new class of nitroxide macromolecules—brush-arm star polymerORCAs (BASP-ORCAs)—with unique structures that are designed
to overcome the aforementioned challenges associated with tumor MRI
with nitroxide-based contrast agents. BASP-ORCAs contain a high concentration
of reduction-resistant nitroxide groups bound in an interlayer between
a poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) shell and a polyacetal core. Due to
their shielded and dense nitroxide layer, yet hydrophilic PEGylated
nanostructures, BASP-ORCAs simultaneously possess the highest known
water 1H transverse relaxivities and stabilities for nitroxideORCAs. In addition, the modularity of BASP synthesis was exploited
to install near-infrared fluorophores into BASP-ORCAs and thereby
achieve near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging in concert with
MRI. Leveraging this combination of features, BASP-ORCAs were successfully
employed for longitudinal MR and NIRF imaging of tumors with MRI contrast
enhancement on par with metal-based contrast agents observed up to
1 day following systemic administration, which has, to our knowledge,
never been achieved with a paramagnetic organic agent. Notably, though
previous studies on nitroxide MRI contrast agents focused on T1-weighted imaging, BASP-ORCAs operate
most effectively as T2 contrast agents,
which is advantageous given that high-field instruments are being
increasingly adopted in the clinic, and r2 often remains similar or increases with magnetic field strength.[74] Thus, BASP-ORCAs not only overcome the challenges
that have plagued all previous nitroxide-based MRI contrast agents,
and thereby facilitate the first longitudinal imaging of tumors with
a nitroxide ORCA, but they are also naturally amenable to current
and future clinical high-field MRI instruments.
Results and Discussion
BASP-ORCA
Design and Synthesis
One of the most common
ways to increase the relaxivity of MRI contrast agents (including
nitroxides) involves attaching them to a rigid macromolecular scaffold.[6,47,52,53,75−78] For example, Rajca and co-workers
appended a spirocyclohexyl nitroxide derivative (“chex”)[79] to the surface of dendrimers
to produce chex-dendrimer ORCAs where the per-chexr1 was 0.42 mM–1 s–1 compared to r1 = 0.14
mM–1 s–1 for the model nitroxide
3-carboxy-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-l-pyrrolidinyloxy (3-CP).[52,53] In a later study, we appended chex to the core of PEGylated branched-bottlebrush polymers.[80] The resulting “chex-bottlebrush”
had a per-chexr1 of 0.32
mM–1 s–1, which was approximately
50% greater than the chex-macromonomer used to synthesize
these polymers (chex-MM, Figure a). In this system, r2 also increased from 0.30 mM–1 s–1 for chex-MM to 0.82 mM–1 s–1 for the chex-bottlebrush polymer, thus demonstrating
that increasing the macromolecular size and chex density
leads to increases in both r1 and r2, with a greater increase in r2.[80] In an effort to further
increase these relaxivity values, we sought to incorporate chex into our BASP macromolecules wherein the nitroxides would be bound
at a rigid core–shell interface.[80−83] On the basis of this novel structure
compared to previous systems, we hypothesized that BASPs could provide
enhanced relaxivity and nitroxide stability potentially making tumor
imaging in vivo possible. Moreover, the control and
robustness of BASP synthesis would enable the scalable production
of BASP-ORCAs with optimal sizes for tumor accumulation, which is
difficult with previous macromolecular systems such as dendrimers
and bottlebrush polymers.[84−86]
Figure 1
(a) Chemical
structures of BASP components studied in this work.
(b) General brush-first ROMP procedure. Branched MMs chex-MM and Cy-MM are combined in the ratio j : 0.01j. This combination of MMs is exposed to 1.0 equiv of Grubbs
III initiator to produce a living bottlebrush with an average degree
of polymerization (DP) = j + 0.01j = m. N equiv of acetal-XL is then added (in aliquots of 5 equiv of acetal-XL every
5 min) to provide the final BASP-ORCA. The properties of the BASP-ORCAs
are defined by their m and N values
(Table ).
(a) Chemical
structures of BASP components studied in this work.
(b) General brush-first ROMP procedure. Branched MMschex-MM and Cy-MM are combined in the ratio j : 0.01j. This combination of MMs is exposed to 1.0 equiv of Grubbs
III initiator to produce a living bottlebrush with an average degree
of polymerization (DP) = j + 0.01j = m. N equiv of acetal-XL is then added (in aliquots of 5 equiv of acetal-XL every
5 min) to provide the final BASP-ORCA. The properties of the BASP-ORCAs
are defined by their m and N values
(Table ).
Table 1
Characterization Data for BASP-ORCAs
and Control Compounds
composition
diameter
relaxivity
name
m
N
Dh/nm
DTEM/nm
r1/mM–1 s–1
r2/mM–1 s–1
notes
3-CPa
0.15
0.17
chex-MMb
0.21
0.30
chex-dendrimera
0.44
0.86
chex-bottlebrushb
55.55
17b
n.d.
0.32
0.82
BASP-ORCA
5.05
20
31 ± 2
n.d.
0.27
6.92
poor solubility (<10 mg/mL)
BASP-ORCA
5.05
30
49 ± 6
n.d.
0.53
7.11
poor solubility (<10 mg/mL)
BASP-ORCA1
7.07
20
31 ± 4
37 ± 7
0.41
4.67
good solubility (>50 mg/mL)
BASP-ORCA
7.07
30
36 ± 3
n.d.
0.35
7.40
poor solubility (<10 mg/mL)
BASP-ORCA
9.99
15
28 ± 3
38 ± 10
0.33
2.90
low relaxivity
BASP-ORCA
9.99
30
33 ± 4
39 ± 10
0.37
4.52
low relaxivity
From refs (52 and 53).
From ref (80).
BASP-ORCAs were synthesized by brush-first ring-opening
metathesis
polymerization (ROMP) as depicted in Figure .[84,86−88] Norbornene-based branched macromonomers (MMs, Figure a) featuring 3 kDa PEG and either chex (chex-MM) or Cy5.5 dye (Cy-MM, Figure a) were copolymerized by exposure to Grubbs
third-generation bis-pyridine initiator[89] (Grubbs III, Figure a; reaction stoichiometry: j equiv. chex-MM to 0.01j Cy-MM to 1.0 Grubbs III) for 30 min
(Figure b). The resulting
living bottlebrush polymers with an average degree of polymerization
(DP) of ∼j + 0.01j = m were then cross-linked via portionwise addition of N equiv of bis-norbornene acetal cross-linker acetal-XL(84) (Figure a) to the reaction mixture to generate the desired
BASP-ORCA (Figure b). With this method, the BASP-ORCA size is determined by the MM
to Grubbs III to acetal-XL ratios (i.e., m and N values). Much less Cy-MM (0.01j) relative to chex-MM (j) was used
to bridge the difference in concentration requirements between MRI
(mM to μM) and NIRF (nM to pM).[1,6]To identify
optimal conditions for the synthesis of BASP-ORCAs
with narrow size distributions and average diameters of ∼25–40
nm, as well as high water solubility and relaxivity, we screened m and N values from 5−10 and 15–30,
respectively (Table ). Gel permeation chromatography (GPC) revealed
nearly quantitative MM-to-bottlebrush conversion as well as ≥85%
bottlebrush-to-BASP conversion for all m and N values (Figure S1). The BASP-ORCA
diameters as determined by dynamic light scattering (DLS) and transmission
electron microscopy (TEM) ranged from ∼28 to ∼49 nm
(Table ). In general,
for the same bottlebrush arm length (m), the BASP-ORCA
size increased with the amount of acetal-XL added (N). In addition, the BASP-ORCA aqueous solubility (Table ) increased with m. A representative TEM image for the m = 7.07 and N = 20 BASP-ORCA (referred to as BASP-ORCA1 throughout the remainder of this work) is provided
in Figure a. The aqueous
solubility of BASP-ORCA1 was the highest amongst the
BASP-ORCAs prepared, and its hydrodynamic diameter (Dh) of 31 ± 4 nm is suitable for extended in vivo circulation and tumor accumulation.[66−68]
Figure 2
(a) Transmission electron microscopy image of BASP-ORCA1 (DTEM = 37 ± 7 nm) after being
negatively stained with uranyl acetate; the reported diameter (DTEM) represents the mean and standard deviation
of >150 individual particle measurements. (b) Electron paramagnetic
resonance (EPR) spectra for BASP-ORCA1 and chex-MM. (c) T1 and T2-weighted MRI phantoms for BASP-ORCA1, chex-MM, PBS buffer, chex-bottlebrush, and a
PEG-BASP lacking chex. The concentration of chex-containing samples (BASP-ORCA1, chex-MM,
and chex-bottlebrush) ranges from 1 mM to 4 mM chex. The concentration of PEG-BASP lacking chex ranges from 6 mg/mL to 21 mg/mL, which is equivalent to the mass
per volume concentration range of BASP-ORCA1.
From refs (52 and 53).From ref (80).(a) Transmission electron microscopy image of BASP-ORCA1 (DTEM = 37 ± 7 nm) after being
negatively stained with uranyl acetate; the reported diameter (DTEM) represents the mean and standard deviation
of >150 individual particle measurements. (b) Electron paramagnetic
resonance (EPR) spectra for BASP-ORCA1 and chex-MM. (c) T1 and T2-weighted MRI phantoms for BASP-ORCA1, chex-MM, PBS buffer, chex-bottlebrush, and a
PEG-BASP lacking chex. The concentration of chex-containing samples (BASP-ORCA1, chex-MM,
and chex-bottlebrush) ranges from 1 mM to 4 mM chex. The concentration of PEG-BASP lacking chex ranges from 6 mg/mL to 21 mg/mL, which is equivalent to the mass
per volume concentration range of BASP-ORCA1.
Characterization of BASP-ORCA Magnetic Properties
Electron
paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR) was used to confirm the
presence of chex in BASP-ORCAs, as well as to study the chex environment in BASP-ORCA1. The spin concentrations
were ≥85% for all BASP-ORCAs. The height-normalized EPR spectra
for BASP-ORCA1 and chex-MM[80] are shown in Figure b. The spectrum for BASP-ORCA1 is significantly
broader than chex-MM, which is consistent with the larger
and more rigid BASP nanostructure where chex is bound
at the dense interface between the acetal cross-linker core and the
PEG shell (Figures b and 2b). The BASP-ORCA1 spectrum
was simulated using the procedure developed by Budil, Freed, and co-workers[90] (see Supporting Information section A for details), which allows for characterization of the chex mobility in terms of the correlation time for rotational
diffusion (τ). The spectrum was best fitted by superimposing
two computed components (Figure S3): 22%
corresponded to a relatively fast-moving nitroxide with τ =
0.2 ns, while 78% corresponded to a slow-moving nitroxide with τ
= 10.0 ns. The faster-moving component likely corresponds to nitroxides
that are furthest from the BASP-ORCA1 acetal core (Figure b), while the slow-moving
component corresponds to nitroxides that are close to and/or entangled
within the acetal core. Notably, the τ of 10.0 ns measured for
the slow component in BASP-ORCA1 is quite large, which
suggests that a majority of the chex groups are in a
rigid environment. For comparison, in our previously reported chex-dendrimer ORCAs,[52,53] TEMPO-labeled bottlebrush
polymers,[81,82] and BASPs,[83] the
largest τ measured was ∼1 ns.Next, we evaluated
the longitudinal (r1) and transverse (r2) relaxivities of these BASP-ORCAs using a
Bruker 7 T MRI scanner. The per-chexr1 values as a function of m and N (Table ) ranged from 0.27 to 0.53 mM–1 s–1; they were not significantly increased compared to Rajca’s chex-dendrimer and our chex-bottlebrush polymers.
However, the per-chexr2 values
ranged from 2.90 to 7.40 mM–1 s–1, which is ∼3.5- to ∼9.0-fold greater than the per-chexr2 in our chex-bottlebrush polymers and ∼17- to ∼44-fold greater
than 3-CP (Table ).[80]BASP-ORCA1 displayed
a per-chexr2 value of 4.67
mM–1 s–1. Though this value was
not the highest we measured, we selected BASP-ORCA1 for
translation to biological studies because it offered the best balance
of high relaxivity, solubility (greater than 50 mg/mL, Table ), and size. Given the number-average
molar mass of BASP-ORCA1 as determined by gel permeation
chromatography and static light scattering (Mn = 4.75 × 105 g/mol, = 1.32), we estimate that each BASP-ORCA1 particle
contains an average of 92 chex groups. Thus, the estimated
average molecular r1 and r2 values for BASP-ORCA1 are 37.6 mM–1 s–1 and 428.8 mM–1 s–1, respectively, which are greater than those for the commonly used
FDA-approved Gd-based contrast agent Magnevist (r1 = 3.1 mM–1 s–1 and r2 = 5.4 mM–1 s–1 at 7 T) and iron-based nanoparticles such as Feraheme (r1 = 3.1 mM–1 s–1 and r2 = 68 mM–1 s–1 at 7 T).[91−94]MR phantom images of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solutions
of BASP-ORCA1, chex-MM, and our previously
reported chex-bottlebrush polymer at various chex concentrations (from 1 mM−4 mM chex) as well
as a PEG-BASP that lacks chex (at equivalent mass fractions
to BASP-ORCA1) are provided in (Figure c), along with images for “blank”
PBS buffer. The T1-weighted images for BASP-ORCA1, and chex-bottlebrush polymer are
not obviously different, while the T2-weighted
images clearly show a large reduction in signal for BASP-ORCA1. The PEG-BASP with no chex shows no difference in contrast
as a function of concentration, which confirms that chex is required to observe changes in image contrast.The data
presented above demonstrate that the high nitroxide density
of BASP-ORCA1, which is a consequence of its unique cross-linked
multilayer nanostructure, affords an increased magnetization capability
that leads to r2 enhancement. This finding
is consistent with reports where nitroxides are utilized as magnetic
catalysts for outer-sphere relaxation processes.[95−97] Most importantly,
the exceptionally high r2 of BASP-ORCA1 overcomes one of the major limitations of nitroxide-based contrast
agents: inherently low contrast.
Ascorbate Quenching Kinetics
of BASP-ORCAs
As discussed
above, nitroxide-based ORCAs typically suffer from rapid reduction
to diamagnetic hydroxylamines under biologically relevant conditions.
Among the many potential biological reducing agents, ascorbate (Asc)
is known to play a major role in in vivo nitroxide
reduction,[54,98,99] and Asc-induced reduction can be amplified by glutathione (GSH).[80,99] We hypothesized that the rigid chex environment in
our BASP-ORCAs could help to lower the rate of chex reduction.
To test this hypothesis, we collected EPR spectra for BASP-ORCA1 at various times following exposure to 20 equiv of Asc and 20 equiv
of GSH per nitroxide (both reagents were present in 10 mM concentrations).
EPR spectra collected 1, 40, and 180 min after exposure to these conditions
are provided in Figure a. The changes in peak height as a function of time are indicative
of nitroxide reduction. The normalized peak height of the EPR spectra
are plotted versus time in Figure b. Reduction kinetics data for our previous chex-bottlebrush polymers and chex-MM are provided for comparison.[80] In contrast to the chex-bottlebrush
and chex-MM samples, which both display an initial rapid chex reduction phase in the first hour, the reduction of chex in BASP-ORCA1 was significantly retarded
with nearly 85% remaining after 1 h, and 70% remaining after 3 h (compared
to 65% and 57%, respectively, for the chex-bottlebrush).
On the basis of the integrated peak heights as a function of time,
the second-order rate constants for BASP-ORCA1 reduction
in the initial (first 10 min) and late (>1 h) stages of the reduction
process were calculated: kearly = 0.0376
M–1 s–1 and klate ≈ 0.00672 M–1 s–1) (Table S1).[52,53,80] Simulations revealed that the EPR spectra
collected during the reduction process consisted of a “fast”
and a “slow” component (Figure S3). Interestingly, τ for the “fast” component
remained constant at 0.2 ns, while τ for the “slow”
component became increasingly larger with time (11.0 ns at 40 min
and 13.2 ns at 180 min). Therefore, even after 3 h there persists
an extremely reduction resistant and slow moving nitroxide population.
The presence of these very stable nitroxides within BASP-ORCA1 may enable T2-weighted MRI over longer time scales than
have been possible with previous nitroxide contrast agents (vide infra).
Figure 3
(a) EPR spectra for BASP-ORCA1 1, 40, and
180 min
following exposure to 20 equiv of sodium ascorbate (Asc) per nitroxide.
(b) Ascorbate reduction kinetics for BASP-ORCA1, chex-bottlebrush, and chex-MM. (c) Cy5.5 emission
at 700 nm in response to Asc and glutathione (GSH); the reported values
represent the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 3).
(a) EPR spectra for BASP-ORCA1 1, 40, and
180 min
following exposure to 20 equiv of sodium ascorbate (Asc) per nitroxide.
(b) Ascorbate reduction kinetics for BASP-ORCA1, chex-bottlebrush, and chex-MM. (c) Cy5.5 emission
at 700 nm in response to Asc and glutathione (GSH); the reported values
represent the mean and standard error of the mean (SEM) (n = 3).
Fluorescence Properties
of BASP-ORCAs
As noted above,
Cy5.5 was also incorporated into these BASP-ORCAs (see Figure S4 for BASP-ORCA1 absorption
and emission spectra confirming the presence of Cy5.5) in order to
simultaneously use NIRF as an imaging modality for comparison to MRI.
Nitroxides are well-known to quench fluorescence via catalysis of
nonemissive photophysical processes such as intersystem crossing.
This quenching requires close interaction between the nitroxide and
the fluorophore; the systems with the greatest quenching typically
feature the nitroxide directly linked to the fluorophore via π
bonds (i.e., electronic conjugation).[100−102] Given the fact that chex and Cy5.5 are incorporated into BASP-ORCAs via two different
macromonomers and that the mobility of chex is limited
in these constructs, we reasoned that Cy5.5 quenching would be minimal;
therefore, we could potentially use Cy5.5 emission as a fairly constant
descriptor of particle concentration regardless of the extent of chex reduction.To test this hypothesis, we exposed BASP-ORCA1 to a large excess of Asc (40–120 equiv.
to chex) in water, and monitored the resulting Cy5.5
emission. In agreement with our expectation, only a 25 ± 2% to
30 ± 2% increase in fluorescence emission was observed (Figure c). Moreover, addition
of GSH (60 equiv) as a coreductant along with 60 equiv of Asc gave
only a 35 ± 7% increase in fluorescence. Taken together, these
data suggest that Cy5.5 fluorescence is minimally quenched by chex in BASP-ORCA1. For comparison, exposure
of our previously reported chex-bottlebrush polymer containing
Cy5.5 to excess Asc or Asc+GSH led to 119 ± 5% and 250 ±
5% increases in fluorescence, respectively.[80] Notably, the time required to achieve a fluorescence plateau varied
significantly between BASP-ORCA1 (approximately 40 min)
and our chex-bottlebrush polymer (a few minutes). Collectively,
these data suggest that the BASP nanostructure provides greater steric
shielding and isolation of chex and Cy5.5 compared to
the chex-bottlebrush polymer.
In Vitro Cytotoxicity and in Vivo Gross Toxicity, Pharmacokinetics
(PK), and Biodistribution (BD)
of BASP-ORCA1 in Non-Tumor-Bearing Mice
Next,
we investigated the performance of BASP-ORCA1 in biological
assays. As discussed above, one potential advantage of ORCAs is their
low toxicity. To assess the toxicity of BASP-ORCA1, we
first conducted in vitro human umbilical vein endothelial
cell (HUVEC) and HeLa cell viability assays. In these assays, the
cells were incubated with varied concentrations of BASP-ORCA1 for 72 h. Cell viability was determined by the CellTiter-Glo assay
(Supplemental Figure S5). The half-maximal
inhibitory concentrations of BASP-ORCA1, i.e., the concentrations
that led to 50% cell death, were 1.5 mg/mL (280 μM chex) and 4.5 mg/mL (830 μM chex) in HUVEC and HeLa
cells, respectively. These results confirm that BASP-ORCA1 induces negligible in vitro cytotoxicity at practical
concentrations.[85,86] Next, the in vivo gross toxicity of BASP-ORCA1 was assessed. Healthy
BALB/c mice were administered increasing doses (from 5 to 30 mg or
0.2 to 1.5 g/kg, respectively) of BASP-ORCA1 via tail
vein injection. The animal body masses and behaviors were monitored
over the course of 30 days. Loss of ≥10% body mass is generally
considered to be a sign of unacceptable toxicity.[103,104] As shown in Figure S6, even the highest
dose of BASP-ORCA1 (administered to n = 4 animals) induced no significant decrease in body mass, which
suggests that these particles are well-tolerated up to their solubility-limiting
dose.The pharmacokinetics (PK) and biodistribution (BD) of BASP-ORCA1 were monitored in healthy, nontumor bearing BALB/c
mice (n = 3) using NIRF imaging (IVIS, Cy5.5 λex/λem = 640/700 nm). For PK analysis, blood
samples were collected via cardiac puncture at various time points
from 1 to 48 h. Percent injected dose was plotted as a function of
time (Figure S7a). As is common for spherical
PEGylated nanostructures, BASP-ORCA1 exhibited a two-phase
clearance behavior, with an early distribution phase of ∼6
h, followed by a steady elimination phase.[67,86] Fitting the data presented in Figure S7a with a standard two-compartment model yielded a blood compartment
half-life for BASP-ORCA1 of 10 h.[105] This long half-life is attributed to the nanoscale size
of BASP-ORCA1, which limits renal clearance, and its
PEGylated corona.[66,69] Consistent with these results
and a plethora of studies on PEGylated nanoparticles,[65−69] BD analysis revealed that a majority of BASP-ORCA1 accumulated
in the liver, with increasing accumulation over 72 h (Figure S7b). Less accumulation in the kidney
and negligible accumulation in other tissues was observed. Fluorescence
in extracted lung tissue is attributed to a high concentration of BASP-ORCA1 in the blood. Notably, fluorescence images of fecal
samples (Figure S7c) suggest that BASP-ORCA1 is ultimately cleared from the body via excretion.
BASP-ORCA1 BD in Tumor-Bearing Mice
Given
the long circulation of BASP-ORCA1, we hypothesized that
this particle would passively accumulate in subcutaneous tumors following
systemic injection. To test this hypothesis, we first established
a tumor model via subcutaneous injection of a mixture of 2.0 ×
106 lung carcinoma cells (A549, ATCC), Matrigel, and PBS
buffer into a hind flank of NCR-NU mice (n = 4).
When the average tumor volume was ∼1 cm, BASP-ORCA1 was administered at a dose of 0.23 mmol chex/kg (1.2
g BASP-ORCA1/kg) via tail vein injection. NIRF images
collected 20 h after administration indicated substantial tumor accumulation
of BASP-ORCA1, which is consistent with other reports
for PEGylated nanoparticles of similar size including our related
drug-conjugated BASPs (Figure a).[65,66,69,86]Ex vivo BD data were consistent
with our studies on nontumor bearing BALB/c mice (i.e., liver accumulation
and persistence in blood) with the addition of significant tumor accumulation
(Figure b and Figure S8).
Figure 4
(a) In vivo NIRF images
of NCR nude mouse before
and 20 h after injection of BASP-ORCA1 (see Supporting Information for details). (b) Ex vivo NIRF images of selected organs (see Supporting Information for details). Units of
radiant efficiency: .
(a) In vivo NIRF images
of NCR nude mouse before
and 20 h after injection of BASP-ORCA1 (see Supporting Information for details). (b) Ex vivo NIRF images of selected organs (see Supporting Information for details). Units of
radiant efficiency: .
MRI and NIRF Imaging with BASP-ORCA1 in Tumor-Bearing
Mice
The low toxicity, long circulation half-life, and tumor
accumulation of BASP-ORCA1, along with its exceptional
stability and relaxivity, suggested that this particle could be suitable
for MRI of tumors following systemic injection and accumulation; a
feat that, to our knowledge, has not yet been achieved with ORCAs.
Two groups of A459 tumor-bearing NCR-NU mice were administered different
doses of BASP-ORCA1 via tail-vein injection: the “low
dose” group (n = 3) received 0.16 mmol chex/kg (0.8 g BASP-ORCA1/kg), while the “high
dose” group (n = 4) received 0.23 mmol chex/kg (1.2 g BASP-ORCA1/kg). The mice were
anaesthetized and MR images were collected at various time points:
12, 16, and 20 h postinjection for the low dose group and 20 h postinjection
for the high dose group. The images from each time point were compared
to images collected before BASP-ORCA1 injection. Figures a shows T2-weighted false-colored images for a selected
mouse from the low dose group imaged before BASP-ORCA1 injection (top row of images) and 20 h (bottom row of images) after BASP-ORCA1 injection. From left-to-right the images correspond
to progressive slices of the same animal in the z-axis with the tumor indicated with a yellow arrow in each image. Figure b shows an analogous
set of images for a selected mouse from the high dose group. Contrast
differences between the preinjection and postinjection images can
be observed at both dose levels, with greater contrast observed in
the high dose animal (Figure b). Whole animal images similarly revealed a clear difference
in tumor contrast (Figure c, yellow arrows).
Figure 5
(a) T2-weighted
MR images of tumor
bearing NCR nude mouse before (top row) and 20 h after (bottom row)
injection of 0.16 mmol chex/kg (“low dose”)
of BASP-ORCA1. Each series of images corresponds to progressive
slices in the z-axis through the tumor of the same
mouse. (b) T2-weighted MR images of tumor
bearing NCR nude mouse before (top row) and 20 h after (bottom row)
injection of 0.23 mmol chex/kg (“high dose”)
of BASP-ORCA1. Each series of images corresponds to progressive
slices in the z-axis through the tumor of the same
mouse. (c) T2-weighted coronal MR images before (top) and
20 h after (bottom) injection of 0.23 mmol chex/kg (“high
dose”) of BASP-ORCA1. (d) Percent MRI contrast
change at various times following BASP-ORCA1 injection
compared to preinjection. Statistical comparisons (n = 3 for low dose group; n = 4 for high dose group;
reported values represent mean ± SEM) to preinjection images
were made with a student t test: **P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001.
(a) T2-weighted
MR images of tumor
bearing NCR nude mouse before (top row) and 20 h after (bottom row)
injection of 0.16 mmol chex/kg (“low dose”)
of BASP-ORCA1. Each series of images corresponds to progressive
slices in the z-axis through the tumor of the same
mouse. (b) T2-weighted MR images of tumor
bearing NCR nude mouse before (top row) and 20 h after (bottom row)
injection of 0.23 mmol chex/kg (“high dose”)
of BASP-ORCA1. Each series of images corresponds to progressive
slices in the z-axis through the tumor of the same
mouse. (c) T2-weighted coronal MR images before (top) and
20 h after (bottom) injection of 0.23 mmol chex/kg (“high
dose”) of BASP-ORCA1. (d) Percent MRI contrast
change at various times following BASP-ORCA1 injection
compared to preinjection. Statistical comparisons (n = 3 for low dose group; n = 4 for high dose group;
reported values represent mean ± SEM) to preinjection images
were made with a student t test: **P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001.The percent negative contrast enhancement (i.e.,
the amount of
signal reduction) before and after BASP-ORCA1 administration
was quantified by image analysis (Figure d). Signal reductions ranging from 14 ±
2% to 16 ± 2% (P ≤ 0.05) were observed
for the 12 to 20 h time points in the low dose group (Figure d, red bars). In the high dose
group, a 24 ± 2% (P ≤ 0.001) signal reduction
was observed 20 h after BASP-ORCA1 administration (Figure d, blue bar). The BASP-ORCA1 dose–response effect suggests that the observed
contrast differences between pre- and postinjection are due to accumulation
of BASP-ORCA1 in the tumors. Keeping in mind that MRI
phantoms revealed no observable contrast enhancement for PEG-BASPs
that lack chex (Figure c), these MRI data imply that 20 h following injection
there is a sufficient concentration of chex radicals
present on the BASP-ORCA1 in the tumor to impart contrast.
To confirm the presence of chex radicals in the tumors,
the same mice that were imaged by MRI were sacrificed 21 h after BASP-ORCA1 administration and their tissue homogenates and
blood were analyzed by EPR spectroscopy (Figure a). From these spectra, the radical concentration
per gram of protein in each tissue sample, the latter obtained via
a bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA), was evaluated and normalized by
the radical concentration per gram of protein in muscle tissue (Figure b). In agreement
with our MRI data, the concentration of freeradicals in the tumor
was quite high after BASP-ORCA1 injection; the measured
value of 0.25 ± 0.04 μmol chex/g chex/g of
protein corresponds to 4.5% of the injected dose of chex radicals. Moreover, consistent with our in vivo NIRF imaging results (vide supra), relatively high
radical concentrations were observed in the liver and kidney, which
suggests that the clearance of BASP-ORCA1 proceeded mostly
through these organs. Notably, the murine liver contains a high concentration
of Asc (millimolar range); our observation of radicals in the liver
is further evidence of the extremely stable nature of the chex units in BASP-ORCA1 (Note: in our
previous chex-bottlebrush polymers, there was very little chex radical in the liver following 30 min and none observed
after 24 h). A high chex concentration was also observed
in the heart, which is in accord with a long blood compartment half-life
and is consistent with our PK data obtained by NIRF imaging. Finally,
NIRF imaging of these homogenates provided fluorescence radiant efficiencies
that were in good agreement with our spin concentrations (Figure b), which suggests
that the chex radicals and Cy5.5 dyes are still colocalized
within the BASP-ORCA1 construct after biodistribution.
Unlike our previous chex-bottlebrush polymers, which
displayed dramatic increases in fluorescence as chex was
reduced, the signal uniformity offered by BASP-ORCA1 provides
for straightforward multimodal confirmation of BD.
Figure 6
(a) EPR spectra obtained
for homogenized tissue samples collected
for the same mice imaged in Figure 22 h following BASP-ORCA1 injection.
(b) Blue: Muscle-normalized concentration of chex per
gram of protein as obtained from EPR double integration of tissue
homogenates. Red: Muscle-normalized concentration of Cy5.5 in tissue
homogenates as obtained from NIRF imaging. Statistical comparisons
(n = 4; reported values represent mean ± SEM)
to muscle signal were made with a Student’s t test: *not significant, **P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001.
(a) EPR spectra obtained
for homogenized tissue samples collected
for the same mice imaged in Figure 22 h following BASP-ORCA1 injection.
(b) Blue: Muscle-normalized concentration of chex per
gram of protein as obtained from EPR double integration of tissue
homogenates. Red: Muscle-normalized concentration of Cy5.5 in tissue
homogenates as obtained from NIRF imaging. Statistical comparisons
(n = 4; reported values represent mean ± SEM)
to muscle signal were made with a Student’s t test: *not significant, **P ≤ 0.05, ***P ≤ 0.001.To the best of our knowledge, BASP-ORCA1 is
the first
nitroxide MRI contrast agent capable of providing significant contrast
20 h after injection, which is a testament to its unique structural
features that combine optimal size for tumor accumulation with a high
nitroxide density and stability. To set these results in context,
we compared our data to recent literature examples of MRI-contrast
agents that rely on metals to achieve tumor imaging following systemic
administration. For example, Kataoka and co-workers recently reported
on a new class of Gd-based nanoparticles (T1 contrast agents) for MRI of tumors. In their study, a ∼40%
contrast enhancement (at 0.05 mmol Gd/kg iv dose) was observed 4 h
following injection into mice bearing subcutaneous C26 tumors. Notably,
the commercially available small molecule contrast agent Gd-DTPA exhibited
negligible contrast enhancement (at 0.23 mmol Gd/kg iv dose) after
4 h.[16] This example highlights the importance
of a nanoparticle system for extended circulation and tumor imaging.
The same group reported Fe-based nanoparticles (T2 contrast agents) for tumor imaging in a similar murine
model (subcutaneous C26 tumors). Here, an approximately 25% contrast
difference was observed 24 h following intravenous administration
of 0.45 mg Fe/kg. Notably, less than 10% contrast enhancement was
observed using commercially available Resovist (at 0.45 mg Fe/kg intravenous
dose).[15] It should be noted that the instrument
parameters used to obtain T2-weighted
images in this work were similar to those used above in our studies;
thus, our results for BASP-ORCA1 are on par with recently
reported nanoparticle MRI contrast agents that rely on metals to achieve
contrast.
Conclusion
We
have developed a nitroxide-based macromolecular MRI contrast
agent —BASP-ORCA1— that enables simultaneous
MRI and NIRF imaging in vivo over time scales suitable
for tumor imaging following systemic injection. BASP-ORCA1 addresses the two major challenges that have historically limited
nitroxide-based organic radical contrast agents for MRI: low relaxivity
and poor stability. These functions were made possible by the brush-arm
star polymer (BASP) nanostructure, which places a dense layer of chex nitroxides at the interface between a rigid poly(acetal)
core and a hydrophilic PEG shell. Altogether, BASP-ORCA1 displayed unprecedented per-nitroxide and per-molecule transverse
relaxivities for organic radical contrast agents, exceptional stability,
high water solubility, low in vitro and in
vivo toxicity, and a long blood compartment half-life. These
features combined to facilitate the imaging of subcutaneous tumors
in mice 20 h after tail-vein injection, providing contrast enhancements
on par with commercial and literature examples of metal-based contrast
agents. This work suggests that organic radicals can be viable alternatives
to metal-based MRI contrast agents, and sets the stage for the development
of theranostic systems that combine organic radical contrast agents
with therapeutic payloads to achieve simultaneous tumor imaging and
drug delivery without concerns over long-term tissue accumulation
of metals.
Authors: He Wei; Oliver T Bruns; Michael G Kaul; Eric C Hansen; Mariya Barch; Agata Wiśniowska; Ou Chen; Yue Chen; Nan Li; Satoshi Okada; Jose M Cordero; Markus Heine; Christian T Farrar; Daniel M Montana; Gerhard Adam; Harald Ittrich; Alan Jasanoff; Peter Nielsen; Moungi G Bawendi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Beatrice Nardone; Elise Saddleton; Anne E Laumann; Beatrice J Edwards; Dennis W Raisch; June M McKoy; Steven M Belknap; Christian Bull; Anand Haryani; Shawn E Cowper; Ali K Abu-Alfa; Frank H Miller; Victoria Godinez-Puig; Vikas R Dharnidharka; Dennis P West Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2013-09-21
Authors: Ryan M Davis; Anastasia L Sowers; William DeGraff; Marcelino Bernardo; Angela Thetford; Murali C Krishna; James B Mitchell Journal: Free Radic Biol Med Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 7.376
Authors: Yan Xia; Yongjun Li; Alan O Burts; M Francesca Ottaviani; David A Tirrell; Jeremiah A Johnson; Nicholas J Turro; Robert H Grubbs Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2011-11-21 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Francesca J Nicholls; Matthew W Rotz; Harmanvir Ghuman; Keith W MacRenaris; Thomas J Meade; Michel Modo Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2015-11-14 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Victoria S R Harrison; Christiane E Carney; Keith W MacRenaris; Emily A Waters; Thomas J Meade Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Hung V-T Nguyen; Nolan M Gallagher; Farrukh Vohidov; Yivan Jiang; Ken Kawamoto; Hui Zhang; Jiwon V Park; Zhihao Huang; M Francesca Ottaviani; Andrzej Rajca; Jeremiah A Johnson Journal: ACS Macro Lett Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 6.903
Authors: Madushani Dharmarwardana; André F Martins; Zhuo Chen; Philip M Palacios; Chance M Nowak; Raymond P Welch; Shaobo Li; Michael A Luzuriaga; Leonidas Bleris; Brad S Pierce; A Dean Sherry; Jeremiah J Gassensmith Journal: Mol Pharm Date: 2018-05-29 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Hung V-T Nguyen; Alexandre Detappe; Nolan M Gallagher; Hui Zhang; Peter Harvey; Changcun Yan; Clelia Mathieu; Matthew R Golder; Yivan Jiang; Maria Francesca Ottaviani; Alan Jasanoff; Andrzej Rajca; Irene Ghobrial; P Peter Ghoroghchian; Jeremiah A Johnson Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Junfeng Wang; Huan Wang; Ian A Ramsay; Derek J Erstad; Bryan C Fuchs; Kenneth K Tanabe; Peter Caravan; Eric M Gale Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 7.446