The synthesis of polymer therapeutics capable of controlled loading and synchronized release of multiple therapeutic agents remains a formidable challenge in drug delivery and synthetic polymer chemistry. Herein, we report the synthesis of polymer nanoparticles (NPs) that carry precise molar ratios of doxorubicin, camptothecin, and cisplatin. To our knowledge, this work provides the first example of orthogonally triggered release of three drugs from single NPs. The highly convergent synthetic approach opens the door to new NP-based combination therapies for cancer.
The synthesis of polymer therapeutics capable of controlled loading and synchronized release of multiple therapeutic agents remains a formidable challenge in drug delivery and synthetic polymer chemistry. Herein, we report the synthesis of polymer nanoparticles (NPs) that carry precise molar ratios of doxorubicin, camptothecin, and cisplatin. To our knowledge, this work provides the first example of orthogonally triggered release of three drugs from single NPs. The highly convergent synthetic approach opens the door to new NP-based combination therapies for cancer.
Nanoparticle (NP)-based combination
cancer therapy has the potential to overcome the toxicity and poorly
controlled dosing of traditional systemic combination therapies.[1−3] Though NP-based therapeutics for cancer therapy have been the subject
of numerous investigations over the past several decades,[4−8] ratiometric delivery and synchronized release of multiple drugs
from single NP scaffolds remain formidable challenges.[9−12] Many of the most studied NP architectures for delivery—e.g.,
liposomes, micelles, and dendrimers—are not readily amenable
to incorporation and release of multiple drugs.Due to the complex
interactions between drugs in living systems,
a NP platform for precise tuning and rapid variation of drug loading
ratios and release kinetics would enable the discovery of optimal
formulations for specific cancer types. We view this challenge as
a synthetic problem: multi-drug-loaded NP synthesis would be most
efficient if serial particle conjugation and encapsulation reactions
were replaced with highly convergent approaches wherein the key elements
of a desired NP (e.g., drug molecules) are used to build particles
directly.[13−17] Herein we present a novel strategy that uses carefully designed
drug conjugates as building blocks for the parallel construction of
a series of multi-drug-loaded NPs; no extraneous formulation steps
are required.Our NPs carry precise ratios of camptothecin (CPT),
doxorubicin
(DOX), and/or cisplatin (Pt). These drugs were chosen due to their
non-overlapping toxicity profiles.[18,19] The most serious
dose-limiting side effects from doxorubicin arise from cardiotoxicity,[20] while those from cisplatin and camptothecin
result from neurotoxicity[21] and myelosuppression
or hemorrhagic cystitis,[22] respectively.
Thus, maximum therapeutic index could be achieved, in principle, via
simultaneous dosing of each drug at or near its maximum tolerated
dose (MTD). We show that three-drug-loaded NPs with ratios matched
to multiples of the MTD of each drug outperform analogous one- and
two-drug-loaded NPs in in vitro cell viability studies
using ovarian cancer (OVCAR3) cells.Our synthesis relies on
the “brush-first” ring-opening
metathesis polymerization (ROMP) method,[23,24] which enables the preparation of nanoscopic brush-armstar polymers
(BASPs). For the purposes of this study, we designed two novel macromonomers
(MMs) and a novel cross-linker (Figure 1A). CPT-MM and DOX-MM are branched MMs[25] that release unmodified CPT and DOX in response
to cell culture media[26] and long-wavelength
ultraviolet (UV) light,[27] respectively.
Both MMs feature a 3 kDa poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) chain that confers
water solubility and neutral surface charge to the final NP.[28,29]
Figure 1
(A)
Structures of monomers used in this study. (B) Schematic for
synthesis of three-drug-loaded BASP. Drug release occurs in response
to three distinct triggers.
(A)
Structures of monomers used in this study. (B) Schematic for
synthesis of three-drug-loaded BASP. Drug release occurs in response
to three distinct triggers.For our cross-linker design, we were drawn to Pt(IV) diester
derivatives,
which are widely applied as prodrugs for the clinically approved chemotherapeutic
cisplatin.[30−34] Pt(IV) diesters release cytotoxic Pt(II) species upon glutathione-induced
intracellular reduction. We wondered whether a Pt(IV) bis-norbornene
complex could serve as a cross-linker during brush-first ROMP. If
so, then the resulting BASP core would be connected via labile Pt–O
bonds; reduction would lead to particle degradation to yield ∼5
nm brush polymers[27] and free cisplatin.
To explore the feasibility of this approach, we designed and synthesized Pt-XL (Figure 1A, see SI for details).With this pool of novel monomers in
hand, we targeted BASPs with
molar ratios of each drug that correspond to 2 times the MTD of CPT,[35] 2 times the MTD of DOX,[36] and 1 times the MTD of cisplatin.[37] In
the brush-first method, the final BASP size is determined by the MM
to cross-linker ratio.[23] A series of stoichiometry
screens using a non-drug-loaded MM (PEG-MM, Figure 1A) and Pt-XL revealed that the most
uniform BASPs formed when the total MM:Pt-XL ratio was
7:3. Thus, this ratio was held constant for all drug-loaded particles; PEG-MM was simply replaced with DOX-MM and/or CPT-MM. For example, a three-drug-loaded particle (3) was prepared as follows: CPT-MM (2.07 equiv), DOX-MM (0.83 equiv), and PEG-MM (4.09 equiv)
were exposed to Grubbs third-generation catalyst (cat., 1.00 equiv) for 20 min. Pt-XL (3.00 equiv) was added,
and the mixture was stirred for 6 h at room temperature. Analogous
one- and two-drug-loaded particles (1, 2a, and 2b) were prepared in parallel following similar
procedures. In this system, the mass fraction of drug increases with
introduction of new drug (3.4% for 1, 6.1% for 2a, 5.1% for 2b, and 7.8% for 3).Upon completion of the brush-first ROMP reactions, the crude reaction
mixtures were analyzed by gel permeation chromatography (Figure S1). In all cases, the conversion of MM
and brush to BASP was >90%. A combination of UV/vis, 1H
NMR, and inductively coupled mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used to
confirm the drug ratios in 3 (Table
S1). Dynamic light scattering (DLS, Figure 2B) revealed hydrodynamic diameters (DH) from 122 to 191 nm for this series (Figure 2A). These values are larger than we observed for our previous
photocleavable BASPs.[23] Regardless, the
observed DH values are suitable for passive
tumor targeting via the enhanced permeation and retention (EPR) effect:[38] they are larger than the ca. 6–8 nm renal
clearance threshold[39] and smaller than
the 200–250 nm splenic clearance cutoff.[40] Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images of positively
(Figure 2C, top) and negatively (Figure 2C, bottom) stained BASPs showed uniform NPs (Figure S2). CryoTEM images of the BASPs in aqueous
solution (Figure S3) showed particle diameters
that agree well with DLS data.
Figure 2
(A) Table of BASP NPs prepared in this
study along with the MM
stoichiometry used to prepare each particle. BASP diameters as measured
by transmission electron microscopy (DTEM) and dynamic light scattering (DH). TEM data were obtained from dilute aqueous
solutions cast onto a TEM grid, dried, and imaged without staining. DH values were
measured using 0.1 mg BASP/mL 5% glucose solutions. DLS correlation
functions were fit using the CONTIN algorithm. Values in parentheses
correspond to the standard deviation for three particle measurements.
(B) DLS histograms for drug-loaded BASPs. (C) Positively (top) and
negatively (bottom) stained TEM images of 3. Scale bars
correspond to 100 nm.
(A) Table of BASP NPs prepared in this
study along with the MM
stoichiometry used to prepare each particle. BASP diameters as measured
by transmission electron microscopy (DTEM) and dynamic light scattering (DH). TEM data were obtained from dilute aqueous
solutions cast onto a TEM grid, dried, and imaged without staining. DH values were
measured using 0.1 mg BASP/mL 5% glucose solutions. DLS correlation
functions were fit using the CONTIN algorithm. Values in parentheses
correspond to the standard deviation for three particle measurements.
(B) DLS histograms for drug-loaded BASPs. (C) Positively (top) and
negatively (bottom) stained TEM images of 3. Scale bars
correspond to 100 nm.We next studied the cytotoxicity of these BASPs using OVCAR3
humanovarian cancer cells (Figure 3A). OCVAR3 is
an established model cell line derived from a patient with platinum-refractory[41] disease that exhibits genotypic similarity with
the high-grade serous subtype.[42] Given
the widespread clinical use of anthracyclines and topoisomerase I
inhibitors in second-line therapies for recurrent ovarian carcinoma,
OVCAR3 is a suitable model for BASP combination chemotherapy.[43,44] Exposure of OVCAR3 cells to 365 nm UV light for 10 min (black circles)
induced no observable toxicity. A non-drug-loaded BASP[23] displayed toxicity only at very high concentrations
(>650 μg/mL) in the presence and absence of UV light (Figure S4). Among the drug-loaded BASPs, 1 (purple curve) had the largest IC50 value: 192
± 46 μg BASP/mL (23 ± 5 μM drug).
Figure 3
(A) OVCAR3
cell viability data after 72 h of treatment with 5%
glucose (0) and BASPs 1, 2a, 2b, and 3. Data labeled “+hν” were obtained from cells treated with BASP,
irradiated with 365 nm light for 10 min, and then incubated for a
total of 72 h. Solid and dashed lines represent sigmoidal fits for
dark and irradiated samples, respectively. (B) Bar chart of IC50 values along with statistical comparisons. Error represents
standard error of the mean of four technical replicates.
(A) OVCAR3
cell viability data after 72 h of treatment with 5%
glucose (0) and BASPs 1, 2a, 2b, and 3. Data labeled “+hν” were obtained from cells treated with BASP,
irradiated with 365 nm light for 10 min, and then incubated for a
total of 72 h. Solid and dashed lines represent sigmoidal fits for
dark and irradiated samples, respectively. (B) Bar chart of IC50 values along with statistical comparisons. Error represents
standard error of the mean of four technical replicates.BASP 2a (green curve) showed a much
lower IC50: 44 ± 15 μg BASP/mL (8 ± 2 μM
drug). BASP 2b had an IC50 of 217 ± 23
μg BASP/mL
(32 ± 3 μM drug) in the absence of irradiation (red trace),
which is not significantly different from that of 1;
exposure to UV for 20 min led to a 2.3 ± 0.3-fold decrease in
IC50 to 93 ± 11 μg BASP/mL (14 ± 1 μM
drug). No significant decrease in viability was observed following
photoexposure of 1 and 2a (P = 0.078 and 0.018, respectively). These results suggest that therapeutically
active cisplatin and CPT are released from these BASPs without an
external trigger; DOX release is only significant upon irradiation.When cells were treated with three-drug-loaded BASP 3 without UV irradiation (blue curve), the IC50 was 42
± 6 μg BASP/mL (9.2 ± 0.8 μM drug). This result
can be rationalized via extrapolation of the results for 1, 2a, and 2b: in the absence of light, 3 only released CPT and cisplatin, i.e., it behaved similarly
to 2a (P = 0.81). After UV irradiation
for 10 min, the IC50 for 3 dropped 2.3 ±
0.4-fold to 18 ± 2 μg BASP/mL (4.0 ± 0.3 μM
total drug); the three-drug-loaded NP outperformed the one- and two-drug-loaded
systems.To examine cellular internalization of BASPs, we conducted
a series
of confocal fluorescence imaging experiments on live cells using the
inherent fluorescence of DOX. After 30 min of incubation with 2b in the dark, cells were briefly irradiated with 405 nm
laser light once per minute and imaged immediately afterward for 25
min (DOX λex/λem = 561/595 nm).
Figure 4 shows images collected at various
times (see Figure S5 for full series).
Initially, punctate, extranuclear DOX fluorescence was observed to
colocalize with acridine orange in the endo/lysosomes (Figure 4, far left); photoinduced DOX release led to rapid
redistribution of fluorescence throughout the cytoplasm and nucleus
and a 2.7-fold fluorescence intensity increase (Figure S6). To ensure that these results were due to DOX release,
an experiment was conducted wherein cells were pulsed with 561 nm
light rather than 405 nm. In this case, the particles remained in
the endosomes (Figure S7), and no increase
in mean fluorescence intensity was observed.
Figure 4
Phototriggered release
of DOX in OVCAR3 cells as monitored by live-cell
confocal fluorescence imaging. Cells were loaded with 2b for 30 min and concurrently exposed to 405 nm UV irradiation during
imaging of doxorubicin (red; λex/λem = 561/595 nm) and nuclei (acridine orange, green; λex/λem = 488/525 nm). Scale bar is 5 μm.
Phototriggered release
of DOX in OVCAR3 cells as monitored by live-cell
confocal fluorescence imaging. Cells were loaded with 2b for 30 min and concurrently exposed to 405 nm UV irradiation during
imaging of doxorubicin (red; λex/λem = 561/595 nm) and nuclei (acridine orange, green; λex/λem = 488/525 nm). Scale bar is 5 μm.To our knowledge, this work represents
the first example of triplex
drug delivery tuned precisely to specific ratios of each drug. This
novel concept for combination delivery is only made possible using
highly convergent NP synthesis. This approach has no fundamental limitation
in terms of the number and ratio of molecular species that could be
built into particles, as long as the molecules of interest possess
addressable functional groups that are compatible with ROMP. Through
the combination of alternative MMs, drug linkers, and cross-linkers,
libraries of multi-drug-loaded BASPs can be readily synthesized in
parallel for efficacy optimization. These studies along with in vivo analysis of the current BASP systems are currently
ongoing in our laboratories.
Authors: Nagesh Kolishetti; Shanta Dhar; Pedro M Valencia; Lucy Q Lin; Rohit Karnik; Stephen J Lippard; Robert Langer; Omid C Farokhzad Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Shanta Dhar; Weston L Daniel; David A Giljohann; Chad A Mirkin; Stephen J Lippard Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2009-10-21 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Rochelle R Arvizo; Oscar R Miranda; Daniel F Moyano; Chad A Walden; Karuna Giri; Resham Bhattacharya; J David Robertson; Vincent M Rotello; Joel M Reid; Priyabrata Mukherjee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: R Plummer; R H Wilson; H Calvert; A V Boddy; M Griffin; J Sludden; M J Tilby; M Eatock; D G Pearson; C J Ottley; Y Matsumura; K Kataoka; T Nishiya Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Riddha Das; Ryan F Landis; Gulen Yesilbag Tonga; Roberto Cao-Milán; David C Luther; Vincent M Rotello Journal: ACS Nano Date: 2018-12-10 Impact factor: 15.881
Authors: Caroline Kerr; Christopher A DeRosa; Margaret L Daly; Hengtao Zhang; Gregory M Palmer; Cassandra L Fraser Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 6.988
Authors: Jing Tian; Yuanzeng Min; Zachary Rodgers; Kin Man Au; C Tilden Hagan; Maofan Zhang; Kyle Roche; Feifei Yang; Kyle Wagner; Andrew Z Wang Journal: J Mater Chem B Date: 2017-07-05 Impact factor: 6.331
Authors: Hung V-T Nguyen; Nolan M Gallagher; Farrukh Vohidov; Yivan Jiang; Ken Kawamoto; Hui Zhang; Jiwon V Park; Zhihao Huang; M Francesca Ottaviani; Andrzej Rajca; Jeremiah A Johnson Journal: ACS Macro Lett Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 6.903
Authors: Jonathan C Barnes; Peter M Bruno; Hung V-T Nguyen; Longyan Liao; Jenny Liu; Michael T Hemann; Jeremiah A Johnson Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 15.419