Literature DB >> 27183055

A pH-activatable nanoparticle with signal-amplification capabilities for non-invasive imaging of tumour malignancy.

Peng Mi1,2,3, Daisuke Kokuryo4, Horacio Cabral2, Hailiang Wu2, Yasuko Terada5, Tsuneo Saga4, Ichio Aoki4, Nobuhiro Nishiyama1,3, Kazunori Kataoka2,3,6,7.   

Abstract

Engineered nanoparticles that respond to pathophysiological parameters, such as pH or redox potential, have been developed as contrast agents for the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of tumours. However, beyond anatomic assessment, contrast agents that can sense these pathological parameters and rapidly amplify their magnetic resonance signals are desirable because they could potentially be used to monitor the biological processes of tumours and improve cancer diagnosis. Here, we report an MRI contrast agent that rapidly amplifies magnetic resonance signals in response to pH. We confined Mn(2+) within pH-sensitive calcium phosphate (CaP) nanoparticles comprising a poly(ethylene glycol) shell. At a low pH, such as in solid tumours, the CaP disintegrates and releases Mn(2+) ions. Binding to proteins increases the relaxivity of Mn(2+) and enhances the contrast. We show that these nanoparticles could rapidly and selectively brighten solid tumours, identify hypoxic regions within the tumour mass and detect invisible millimetre-sized metastatic tumours in the liver.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27183055     DOI: 10.1038/nnano.2016.72

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol        ISSN: 1748-3387            Impact factor:   39.213


  41 in total

1.  Development of a T1 contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging using MnO nanoparticles.

Authors:  Hyon Bin Na; Jung Hee Lee; Kwangjin An; Yong Il Park; Mihyun Park; In Su Lee; Do-Hyun Nam; Sung Tae Kim; Seung-Hoon Kim; Sang-Wook Kim; Keun-Ho Lim; Ki-Soo Kim; Sun-Ok Kim; Taeghwan Hyeon
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 2.  Magnetic nanoparticles in MR imaging and drug delivery.

Authors:  Conroy Sun; Jerry S H Lee; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 3.  A perspective on cancer cell metastasis.

Authors:  Christine L Chaffer; Robert A Weinberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Urchin-shaped manganese oxide nanoparticles as pH-responsive activatable T1 contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Taekhoon Kim; Eun-Jin Cho; Youngjoo Chae; Minsik Kim; Aram Oh; Juhong Jin; Eun-Sook Lee; Hionsuck Baik; Seungjoo Haam; Jin-Suck Suh; Yong-Min Huh; Kwangyeol Lee
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Interstitial pH and pO2 gradients in solid tumors in vivo: high-resolution measurements reveal a lack of correlation.

Authors:  G Helmlinger; F Yuan; M Dellian; R K Jain
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 6.  Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis?

Authors:  Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  18F-EF5: a new PET tracer for imaging hypoxia in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Gaber Komar; Marko Seppänen; Olli Eskola; Paula Lindholm; Tove J Grönroos; Sarita Forsback; Hannu Sipilä; Sydney M Evans; Olof Solin; Heikki Minn
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 8.  Imaging in the era of molecular oncology.

Authors:  Ralph Weissleder; Mikael J Pittet
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Comparison between Gd-DTPA, Gd-EOB-DTPA, and Mn-DPDP in induced HCC in rats: a correlation study of MR imaging, microangiography, and histology.

Authors:  G Marchal; X Zhang; Y Ni; P Van Hecke; J Yu; A L Baert
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.546

10.  A brain tumor molecular imaging strategy using a new triple-modality MRI-photoacoustic-Raman nanoparticle.

Authors:  Moritz F Kircher; Adam de la Zerda; Jesse V Jokerst; Cristina L Zavaleta; Paul J Kempen; Erik Mittra; Ken Pitter; Ruimin Huang; Carl Campos; Frezghi Habte; Robert Sinclair; Cameron W Brennan; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Eric C Holland; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  73 in total

Review 1.  Advances in Biomaterials for Drug Delivery.

Authors:  Owen S Fenton; Katy N Olafson; Padmini S Pillai; Michael J Mitchell; Robert Langer
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 30.849

Review 2.  Biomineralized hybrid nanoparticles for imaging and therapy of cancers.

Authors:  Kyung Hyun Min; Hong Jae Lee; Sang Cheon Lee; Kyeongsoon Park
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-08

3.  An implanted pH sensor read using radiography.

Authors:  Md Arifuzzaman; Paul W Millhouse; Yash Raval; Thomas B Pace; Caleb J Behrend; Shayesteh Beladi Behbahani; John D DesJardins; Tzuen-Rong J Tzeng; Jeffrey N Anker
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 4.  Big Potential from Small Agents: Nanoparticles for Imaging-Based Companion Diagnostics.

Authors:  Emily B Ehlerding; Piotr Grodzinski; Weibo Cai; Christina H Liu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Radiolabeled polyoxometalate clusters: Kidney dysfunction evaluation and tumor diagnosis by positron emission tomography imaging.

Authors:  Dalong Ni; Dawei Jiang; Hyung-Jun Im; Hector F Valdovinos; Bo Yu; Shreya Goel; Todd E Barnhart; Peng Huang; Weibo Cai
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 6.  Nanomaterial-Enabled Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Sabina Quader; Kazunori Kataoka
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 11.454

Review 7.  Improving cancer immunotherapy using nanomedicines: progress, opportunities and challenges.

Authors:  John D Martin; Horacio Cabral; Triantafyllos Stylianopoulos; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Physalis Mottle Virus-like Nanoparticles for Targeted Cancer Imaging.

Authors:  He Hu; Hema Masarapu; Yuning Gu; Yifan Zhang; Xin Yu; Nicole F Steinmetz
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-05-10       Impact factor: 9.229

Review 9.  Chemistry of MRI Contrast Agents: Current Challenges and New Frontiers.

Authors:  Jessica Wahsner; Eric M Gale; Aurora Rodríguez-Rodríguez; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 60.622

10.  Interactions Between Tumor Biology and Targeted Nanoplatforms for Imaging Applications.

Authors:  Mehdi Azizi; Hassan Dianat-Moghadam; Roya Salehi; Masoud Farshbaf; Disha Iyengar; Samaresh Sau; Arun K Iyer; Hadi Valizadeh; Mohammad Mehrmohammadi; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 18.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.