Literature DB >> 28768658

Detection of maltodextrin and its discrimination from sucrose are independent of the T1R2 + T1R3 heterodimer.

Kimberly R Smith1, Alan C Spector2.   

Abstract

Maltodextrins, such as Maltrin and Polycose, are glucose polymer mixtures of varying chain lengths that are palatable to rodents. Although glucose and other sugars activate the T1R2 + T1R3 "sweet" taste receptor, recent evidence from T1R2- or T1R3-knockout (KO) mice suggests that maltodextrins, despite their glucose polymer composition, activate a separate receptor mechanism to generate a taste percept qualitatively distinguishable from that of sweeteners. However, explicit discrimination of maltodextrins from prototypical sweeteners has not yet been psychophysically tested in any murine model. Therefore, mice lacking T1R2 + T1R3 and wild-type controls were tested in a two-response taste discrimination task to determine whether maltodextrins are 1) detectable when both receptor subunits are absent and 2) perceptually distinct from that of sucrose irrespective of viscosity, intensity, and hedonics. Most KO mice displayed similar Polycose sensitivity as controls. However, some KO mice were only sensitive to the higher Polycose concentrations, implicating potential allelic variation in the putative polysaccharide receptor or downstream pathways unmasked by the absence of T1R2 + T1R3. Varied Maltrin and sucrose concentrations of approximately matched viscosities were then presented to render the oral somatosensory features, intensity, and hedonic value of the solutions irrelevant. Although both genotypes competently discriminated Maltrin from sucrose, performance was apparently driven by the different orosensory percepts of the two stimuli in control mice and the presence of a Maltrin but not sucrose orosensory cue in KO mice. These data support the proposed presence of an orosensory receptor mechanism that gives rise to a qualitatively distinguishable sensation from that of sucrose.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  knockout mice; maltodextrins; psychophysics; taste; taste receptor subunit

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28768658      PMCID: PMC5668617          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00049.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  42 in total

Review 1.  Linking gustatory neurobiology to behavior in vertebrates.

Authors:  A C Spector
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Taste of dipeptides.

Authors:  S S Schiffman; H H Engelhard
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1976-09

4.  Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.

Authors:  Masashi Inoue; John I Glendinning; Maria L Theodorides; Sarah Harkness; Xia Li; Natalia Bosak; Gary K Beauchamp; Alexander A Bachmanov
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2007-10-02       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  Evidence that humans can taste glucose polymers.

Authors:  Trina J Lapis; Michael H Penner; Juyun Lim
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-08-12

7.  Qualitative differences in polysaccharide and sugar tastes in the rat: a two-carbohydrate taste model.

Authors:  J W Nissenbaum; A Sclafani
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  Influence of saccharide length on polysaccharide appetite in the rat.

Authors:  A Sclafani; H Hertwig; M Vigorito; H Sloan; B Kerzner
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  The cells and peripheral representation of sodium taste in mice.

Authors:  Jayaram Chandrashekar; Christina Kuhn; Yuki Oka; David A Yarmolinsky; Edith Hummler; Nicholas J P Ryba; Charles S Zuker
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

1.  Electrophysiological responses to sugars and amino acids in the nucleus of the solitary tract of type 1 taste receptor double-knockout mice.

Authors:  B Kalyanasundar; Ginger D Blonde; Alan C Spector; Susan P Travers
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Taste sensitivity to a mixture of monosodium glutamate and inosine 5'-monophosphate by mice lacking both subunits of the T1R1+T1R3 amino acid receptor.

Authors:  Ginger D Blonde; Susan P Travers; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 3.619

3.  Novel approaches to the study of viscosity discrimination in rodents.

Authors:  Chihiro Nakatomi; Noritaka Sako; Yuichi Miyamura; Seiwa Horie; Takemi Shikayama; Aoi Morii; Mako Naniwa; Chia-Chien Hsu; Kentaro Ono
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Neural Isolation of the Olfactory Bulbs Severely Impairs Taste-Guided Behavior to Normally Preferred, But Not Avoided, Stimuli.

Authors:  Chizuko Inui-Yamamoto; Ginger D Blonde; Fabienne Schmid; Lauren Mariotti; Matias Campora; Tadashi Inui; Lindsey A Schier; Alan C Spector
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-04-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.