Literature DB >> 28741007

Role of peak current in conversion of patients with ventricular fibrillation.

Venkataraman Anantharaman1, Paul Weng Wan1, Seow Yian Tay2, Peter George Manning3, Swee Han Lim1, Siang Jin Terrance Chua4, Tiru Mohan5, Antony Charles Rabind6, Sudarshan Vidya1, Ying Hao7.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Peak currents are the final arbiter of defibrillation in patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, biphasic defibrillators continue to use energy in joules for electrical conversion in hopes that their impedance compensation properties will address transthoracic impedance (TTI), which must be overcome when a fixed amount of energy is delivered. However, optimal peak currents for conversion of VF remain unclear. We aimed to determine the role of peak current and optimal peak levels for conversion in collapsed VF patients.
METHODS: Adult, non-pregnant patients presenting with non-traumatic VF were included in the study. All defibrillations that occurred were included. Impedance values during defibrillation were used to calculate peak current values. The endpoint was return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).
RESULTS: Of the 197 patients analysed, 105 had ROSC. Characteristics of patients with and without ROSC were comparable. Short duration of collapse < 10 minutes correlated positively with ROSC. Generally, patients with average or high TTI converted at lower peak currents. 25% of patients with high TTI converted at 13.3 ± 2.3 A, 22.7% with average TTI at 18.2 ± 2.5 A and 18.6% with low TTI at 27.0 ± 4.7 A (p = 0.729). Highest peak current conversions were at < 15 A and 15-20 A. Of the 44 patients who achieved first-shock ROSC, 33 (75.0%) received < 20 A peak current vs. > 20 A for the remaining 11 (25%) patients (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: For best effect, priming biphasic defibrillators to deliver specific peak currents should be considered. Copyright: © Singapore Medical Association

Entities:  

Keywords:  collapse duration; defibrillation energy; electrical conversion; peak current; transthoracic impedance

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28741007      PMCID: PMC5523096          DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2017070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Singapore Med J        ISSN: 0037-5675            Impact factor:   1.858


  32 in total

1.  Early defibrillation. Making waves across America.

Authors:  M Newman
Journal:  JEMS       Date:  1997-01

2.  Current required for ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  J N Patton; J F Pantridge
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1979-02-24

3.  Electrical dose for ventricular defibrillation of large and small animals using precordial electrodes.

Authors:  L A Geddes; W A Tacker; J P Rosborough; A G Moore; P S Cabler
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Open chest defibrillation during cardiac surgery: energy and current requirement.

Authors:  R E Kerber; J Carter; S Klein; J Grayzel; J Kennedy
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Relation between transcardiac and transthoracic current during defibrillation in humans.

Authors:  B B Lerman; O C Deale
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Current-based transthoracic defibrillation.

Authors:  R E Kerber; R A Kieso; M G Kienzle; B Olshansky; A L Waldo; M D Carlson; D J Wilber; A M Aschoff; S Birger; F Charbonnier
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator.

Authors:  Roger D White; Thomas H Blackwell; James K Russell; David E Snyder; Dawn B Jorgenson
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  Effects of transthoracic impedance and peak current flow on defibrillation success in a prehospital setting.

Authors:  J P Heavens; M J Cleland; J P Maloney; B H Rowe
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.721

9.  A randomized trial comparing monophasic and biphasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Rudolph W Koster; Paul Dorian; Fred W Chapman; Paul W Schmitt; Sharon G O'Grady; Robert G Walker
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  A multicenter prospective randomized study comparing the efficacy of escalating higher biphasic versus low biphasic energy defibrillations in patients presenting with cardiac arrest in the in-hospital environment.

Authors:  Venkataraman Anantharaman; Seow Yian Tay; Peter George Manning; Swee Han Lim; Terrance Siang Jin Chua; Mohan Tiru; Rabind Antony Charles; Vidya Sudarshan
Journal:  Open Access Emerg Med       Date:  2017-01-13
View more
  2 in total

1.  A Method to Detect Presence of Chest Compressions During Resuscitation Using Transthoracic Impedance.

Authors:  Jason Coult; Jennifer Blackwood; Thomas D Rea; Peter J Kudenchuk; Heemun Kwok
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.772

Review 2.  A Systematic Review of the Transthoracic Impedance during Cardiac Defibrillation.

Authors:  Yasmine Heyer; Daniela Baumgartner; Christian Baumgartner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.