Literature DB >> 15629557

Transthoracic impedance does not affect defibrillation, resuscitation or survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest treated with a non-escalating biphasic waveform defibrillator.

Roger D White1, Thomas H Blackwell, James K Russell, David E Snyder, Dawn B Jorgenson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This is a study of the influence of transthoracic impedance (TTI) on defibrillation, resuscitation and survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), treated with a non-escalating impedance-compensating 150 J biphasic waveform defibrillator.
METHODS: Cardiac arrest data from two EMS systems were analyzed retrospectively. All witnessed arrests from patients who presented with a shockable rhythm and were treated initially by BLS personnel were included (n = 102). For each defibrillation and resuscitation outcome variable, we tested differences in mean TTI for successful versus unsuccessful outcome. The effect of call-to-shock time on overall outcome was also examined.
RESULTS: Initial shocks defibrillated 90% [83-95%] (95% confidence interval) of patients. Cumulative success with two shocks was 98% [93-100%] and with three shocks was 99% [95-100%]. TTI averaged 90 +/- 23 Omega. First-shock success, cumulative success through two shocks and cumulative success through the first-shock series were unrelated to TTI, as were BLS ROSC, pre-hospital ROSC, hospital admission and discharge. In contrast and consistent with previous findings, call-to-shock time was highly predictive of survival.
CONCLUSIONS: High impedance patients were defibrillated by the biphasic waveform used in this study at high rates with a fixed energy of 150 J and without energy escalation. Rapid defibrillation rather than differences in patient impedance accounts for resuscitation success.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15629557     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  11 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances and controversies in adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  Wanis H Ibrahim
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  [Application of the current resuscitation guidelines 2005. Case report of successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation].

Authors:  M Eppinger; G Flury; V Wenzel; J Koppenberg
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Association between transthoracic impedance and electrical cardioversion success with biphasic defibrillators: An analysis of 1055 shocks for atrial fibrillation and flutter.

Authors:  Mouhannad M Sadek; Varsha Chaugai; Mark J Cleland; Timothy J Zakutney; David H Birnie; F Daniel Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.882

4.  Analysis of transthoracic impedance during real cardiac arrest defibrillation attempts in older children and adolescents: are stacked-shocks appropriate?

Authors:  Dana E Niles; Akira Nishisaki; Robert M Sutton; Sara Brunner; Mette Stavland; Shruthi Mahadevaiah; Peter A Meaney; Matthew R Maltese; Robert A Berg; Vinay M Nadkarni
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2010-08-13       Impact factor: 5.262

5.  Role of peak current in conversion of patients with ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Venkataraman Anantharaman; Paul Weng Wan; Seow Yian Tay; Peter George Manning; Swee Han Lim; Siang Jin Terrance Chua; Tiru Mohan; Antony Charles Rabind; Sudarshan Vidya; Ying Hao
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry.

Authors:  Steven M Bradley; Wenhui Liu; Paul S Chan; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Gary K Grunwald; Alyssa Self; Comilla Sasson; Paul D Varosy; Monique L Anderson; Preston M Schneider; P Michael Ho
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-04-06

7.  A framework of current based defibrillation improves defibrillation efficacy of biphasic truncated exponential waveform in rabbits.

Authors:  Weiming Li; Jingru Li; Liang Wei; Jianjie Wang; Li Peng; Juan Wang; Changlin Yin; Yongqin Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparison of Resuscitation Outcomes Between 2- or 3-Stacked Defibrillation Strategies With Minimally Interrupted Chest Compression and the Single Defibrillation Strategy: A Swine Cardiac Arrest Model.

Authors:  Soyeong Kim; Woo Jin Jung; Young Il Roh; Tae Youn Kim; Sung Oh Hwang; Kyoung-Chul Cha
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 9.  [Adult advanced life support].

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 0.826

10.  Significant changes in resuscitation guidelines: current and future recommendations?

Authors:  Walter G J Kloeck
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.