Literature DB >> 4808643

Electrical dose for ventricular defibrillation of large and small animals using precordial electrodes.

L A Geddes, W A Tacker, J P Rosborough, A G Moore, P S Cabler.   

Abstract

Electrical ventricular defibrillation of heavy subjects (over 100 kg body weight) is uncommon for the human or any animal species. This paper reports trans-chest ventricular defibrillation of subjects ranging in weight from 2.3 to 340 kg using conventional defibrillation current (heavily damped sine wave) of 0.3-30 ms duration. It was found that a body weight-to-electrical-shock strength relationship exists and can be expressed in terms of either electrical energy or peak current. For the duration of current pulse used clinically (3-10 ms), the relationship between energy requirement and body weight is expressed by the equation U = 0.73 W(1.52), where U is the energy in W.s and W is the body weight in kilograms. The current relationship is I = 1.87 W(0.88) where I is the peak current in amperes and W is the body weight in kilograms. The energy dose is somewhat more species and weight dependent and ranges from 0.5 to 10 W.s/kg (0.23-4.5 W.s/lb). The data obtained indicate that the peak current dose is virtually species and weight independent and is therefore a better indicator than energy for electrical defibrillation with precordial electrodes. In the duration range of 3-10 ms, the electrical dose is very nearly 1 A/kg of body weight (0.45 A/lb).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4808643      PMCID: PMC301466          DOI: 10.1172/JCI107552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Invest        ISSN: 0021-9738            Impact factor:   14.808


  11 in total

1.  CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIAS FOLLOWING CONDENSER DISCHARGES LED THROUGH AN INDUCTANCE: COMPARISON WITH EFFECTS OF PURE CONDENSER DISCHARGES.

Authors:  B PELESKA
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Physiological effects of condenser discharges with application to tissue stimulation and ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  R S MACKAY; S E LEEDS
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1953-07       Impact factor: 3.531

3.  Comparative analysis of direct current defibrillators.

Authors:  G A Ewy; R D Fletcher; M D Ewy
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.438

4.  Indicated and delivered energy by d-c defibrillators.

Authors:  C J Flynn; F W Fox; J D Bourland
Journal:  J Assoc Adv Med Instrum       Date:  1972 Sep-Oct

5.  Response to passage of electric current through the body.

Authors:  L A Geddes; L E Baker
Journal:  J Assoc Adv Med Instrum       Date:  1971 Jan-Feb

6.  The design rationale of defibrillators.

Authors:  W S Druz
Journal:  J Assoc Adv Med Instrum       Date:  1969-01

7.  Defibrillation without A-V block using capacitor discharge with added inductance.

Authors:  W A Tacker; L A Geddes; H E Hoff
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 17.367

8.  Myocardial infarction with ventricular fibrillation during pregnancy treated by direct current defibrillation with fetal survival.

Authors:  J J Curry; F J Quintana
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Comparative evaluation of some DC cardiac defibrillators.

Authors:  R C Balagot; V R Bandelin
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1969-04       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Hemodynamic effects of ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  D G Pansegrau; F M Abboud
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  19 in total

1.  Ventricular defibrillating threshold: strength-duration and percent-success curves.

Authors:  L A Geddes; W A Tacker; C F Babbs; J D Bourland
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The increased efficacy of high-energy defibrillation.

Authors:  L A Geddes; W A Tacker; J Rosborough; R Chapman; P Cabler; R Rivera
Journal:  Med Biol Eng       Date:  1976-05

3.  The half-cycle sinusoid as an alternative defibrillating waveform in low-energy applications.

Authors:  T W Moore; F N DiMeo; S E Dubin
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Thoracic impedance of adult males during defibrillation--a curious discrepancy.

Authors:  J W Machin; J Brownhill; A Furness
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Ventricular defibrillation thresholds with capacitor discharge.

Authors:  M R Armayor; G Savino; M E Valentinuzzi; O E Clavin; J E Monzón; M T Arredondo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Electrical energy requirements for ventricular defibrillation.

Authors:  A A Adgey
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1978-11

7.  Hypothesis for low-energy transthoracic defibrillation.

Authors:  R A DeSilva
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1979-10

8.  Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold. Evidence for current-based defibrillation.

Authors:  B B Lerman; H R Halperin; J E Tsitlik; K Brin; C W Clark; O C Deale
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Comparison of low-energy versus high-energy biphasic defibrillation shocks following prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Gregory P Walcott; Sharon B Melnick; Cheryl R Killingsworth; Raymond E Ideker
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  Myocardial damage following transthoracic direct current countershock in newborn piglets.

Authors:  D M Gaba; N S Talner
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.