Literature DB >> 28695156

Extending the concept of weighted CT dose index to elliptical phantoms of various aspect ratios.

Andrey Markovich1, Ashraf G Morgan1,2,3, Frank F Dong1,2,3, Andrew N Primak4, Xiang Li1,2,3.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to extend the concept of weighted CT dose index ([Formula: see text]) to the elliptical phantoms. Based on the published body dimension data, eight body aspect ratios were chosen between 1 (perfectly circular) and 1.72 (extremely elliptical). For each aspect ratio, two elliptical cylinders were created digitally to represent adult and pediatric bodies. Their cross-sectional areas were identical to the standard 32- and 16-cm CTDI phantoms. For each phantom, [Formula: see text] at center and periphery were simulated for tube voltages between 70 and 140 kVp using a validated Monte Carlo program. The simulations also provided the average dose over the cross-sectional area, [Formula: see text]. Values of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] allowed linear systems of equations to be established, from which central and peripheral weighting coefficients were solved. Regardless of phantom shape, only two weighting coefficients were needed: [Formula: see text] for the central [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] for the average of the four peripheral [Formula: see text]'s. Over the full range of aspect ratios, [Formula: see text] increased linearly from 0.37 to 0.46, whereas [Formula: see text] decreased linearly from 0.63 to 0.54, allowing the concept of [Formula: see text] to be readily extended to the elliptical phantoms. When cross-sectional area (hence volume) was kept constant, all phantoms had the same [Formula: see text] regardless of shape.

Keywords:  CT; dose; elliptical; index; phantom; weighting coefficient

Year:  2017        PMID: 28695156      PMCID: PMC5497790          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.4.3.031205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  10 in total

1.  Dose equations for tube current modulation in CT scanning and the interpretation of the associated CTDIvol.

Authors:  Robert L Dixon; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Pediatric chest and abdominopelvic CT: organ dose estimation based on 42 patient models.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tian; Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Erik K Paulson; Donald P Frush; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  The impact on CT dose of the variability in tube current modulation technology: a theoretical investigation.

Authors:  Xiang Li; W Paul Segars; Ehsan Samei
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-28       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Radiation dose calculations for CT scans with tube current modulation using the approach to equilibrium function.

Authors:  Xinhua Li; Da Zhang; Bob Liu
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Patient size measured on CT images as a function of age at a tertiary care children's hospital.

Authors:  Patricia L Kleinman; Keith J Strauss; David Zurakowski; Kevin S Buckley; George A Taylor
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part I. development and validation of a Monte Carlo program.

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ehsan Samei; W Paul Segars; Gregory M Sturgeon; James G Colsher; Greta Toncheva; Terry T Yoshizumi; Donald P Frush
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  A study of CT dose distribution in an elliptical phantom and the influence of automatic tube current modulation in the x-y plane.

Authors:  S Sookpeng; C J Martin; D J Gentle
Journal:  J Radiol Prot       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 1.394

8.  Patient size and x-ray transmission in body CT.

Authors:  Kent Ogden; Walter Huda; Ernest M Scalzetti; Marsha L Roskopf
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography(MDCT). ICRP Publication 102.

Authors:  J Valentin
Journal:  Ann ICRP       Date:  2007

10.  Adult abdomen-pelvis CT: Does equilibrium dose-pitch product better account for the kVp dependence of organ dose than conventional CTDI?

Authors:  Xiang Li; Ashraf G Morgan; Christopher L Liptak; John S Muryn; Frank F Dong; Andrew N Primak; W Paul Segars
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.071

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.