Literature DB >> 28694242

Chromatin stiffening underlies enhanced locus mobility after DNA damage in budding yeast.

Sébastien Herbert1,2,3, Alice Brion4,5, Jean-Michel Arbona1,2,3, Mickaël Lelek1,2,3, Adeline Veillet4,5, Benoît Lelandais1,2,3, Jyotsana Parmar1,2,3, Fabiola García Fernández4,5, Etienne Almayrac4,5, Yasmine Khalil4,5, Eleonore Birgy4,5, Emmanuelle Fabre6,5, Christophe Zimmer7,2,3.   

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) induce a cellular response that involves histone modifications and chromatin remodeling at the damaged site and increases chromosome dynamics both locally at the damaged site and globally in the nucleus. In parallel, it has become clear that the spatial organization and dynamics of chromosomes can be largely explained by the statistical properties of tethered, but randomly moving, polymer chains, characterized mainly by their rigidity and compaction. How these properties of chromatin are affected during DNA damage remains, however, unclear. Here, we use live cell microscopy to track chromatin loci and measure distances between loci on yeast chromosome IV in thousands of cells, in the presence or absence of genotoxic stress. We confirm that DSBs result in enhanced chromatin subdiffusion and show that intrachromosomal distances increase with DNA damage all along the chromosome. Our data can be explained by an increase in chromatin rigidity, but not by chromatin decondensation or centromeric untethering only. We provide evidence that chromatin stiffening is mediated in part by histone H2A phosphorylation. Our results support a genome-wide stiffening of the chromatin fiber as a consequence of DNA damage and as a novel mechanism underlying increased chromatin mobility.
© 2017 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; chromatin dynamics; chromatin structure; polymers; yeast

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28694242      PMCID: PMC5579376          DOI: 10.15252/embj.201695842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  64 in total

1.  Pulling a single chromatin fiber reveals the forces that maintain its higher-order structure.

Authors:  Y Cui; C Bustamante
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair.

Authors:  J A Downs; N F Lowndes; S P Jackson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000 Dec 21-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Chromosome dynamics in the yeast interphase nucleus.

Authors:  P Heun; T Laroche; K Shimada; P Furrer; S M Gasser
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-12-07       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Histone H2A variants H2AX and H2AZ.

Authors:  Christophe Redon; Duane Pilch; Emmy Rogakou; Olga Sedelnikova; Kenneth Newrock; William Bonner
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.578

5.  Long-range compaction and flexibility of interphase chromatin in budding yeast analyzed by high-resolution imaging techniques.

Authors:  Kerstin Bystricky; Patrick Heun; Lutz Gehlen; Jörg Langowski; Susan M Gasser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase.

Authors:  M Lisby; R Rothstein; U H Mortensen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Transient sister chromatid separation and elastic deformation of chromosomes during mitosis in budding yeast.

Authors:  X He; S Asthana; P K Sorger
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-06-23       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein promotes resection and bridging of double strand break ends.

Authors:  Michela Clerici; Davide Mantiero; Giovanna Lucchini; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  The functions of budding yeast Sae2 in the DNA damage response require Mec1- and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation.

Authors:  Enrico Baroni; Valeria Viscardi; Hugo Cartagena-Lirola; Giovanna Lucchini; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo.

Authors:  E P Rogakou; C Boon; C Redon; W M Bonner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  27 in total

1.  Rouse model with transient intramolecular contacts on a timescale of seconds recapitulates folding and fluctuation of yeast chromosomes.

Authors:  Marius Socol; Renjie Wang; Daniel Jost; Pascal Carrivain; Cédric Vaillant; Eric Le Cam; Vincent Dahirel; Christophe Normand; Kerstin Bystricky; Jean-Marc Victor; Olivier Gadal; Aurélien Bancaud
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Chaperoning histones at the DNA repair dance.

Authors:  Ujani Chakraborty; Zih-Jie Shen; Jessica Tyler
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2021-10-13

3.  DNA damage reduces heterogeneity and coherence of chromatin motions.

Authors:  Maëlle Locatelli; Josh Lawrimore; Hua Lin; Sarvath Sanaullah; Clayton Seitz; Dave Segall; Paul Kefer; Naike Salvador Moreno; Benton Lietz; Rebecca Anderson; Julia Holmes; Chongli Yuan; George Holzwarth; Kerry S Bloom; Jing Liu; Keith Bonin; Pierre-Alexandre Vidi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 4.  Chromatin Ubiquitination Guides DNA Double Strand Break Signaling and Repair.

Authors:  Ksenia G Kolobynina; Alexander Rapp; M Cristina Cardoso
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 5.  Molecular Link between DNA Damage Response and Microtubule Dynamics.

Authors:  Jung Min Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 6.  DNA Repair: The Search for Homology.

Authors:  James E Haber
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 7.  Polymer perspective of genome mobilization.

Authors:  Colleen J Lawrimore; Josh Lawrimore; Yunyan He; Sergio Chavez; Kerry Bloom
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Modified chromosome structure caused by phosphomimetic H2A modulates the DNA damage response by increasing chromatin mobility in yeast.

Authors:  Fabiola García Fernández; Brenda Lemos; Yasmine Khalil; Renaud Batrin; James E Haber; Emmanuelle Fabre
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 9.  Phase separation of DNA: From past to present.

Authors:  John T King; Anisha Shakya
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-02-12       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  Collaborations between chromatin and nuclear architecture to optimize DNA repair fidelity.

Authors:  Beata Mackenroth; Eric Alani
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2020-11-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.