Literature DB >> 33622771

Modified chromosome structure caused by phosphomimetic H2A modulates the DNA damage response by increasing chromatin mobility in yeast.

Fabiola García Fernández1, Brenda Lemos2, Yasmine Khalil1, Renaud Batrin1, James E Haber2, Emmanuelle Fabre3.   

Abstract

In budding yeast and mammals, double-strand breaks (DSBs) trigger global chromatin mobility together with rapid phosphorylation of histone H2A over an extensive region of the chromatin. To assess the role of H2A phosphorylation in this response to DNA damage, we have constructed strains where H2A has been mutated to the phosphomimetic H2A-S129E. We show that mimicking H2A phosphorylation leads to an increase in global chromatin mobility in the absence of DNA damage. The intrinsic chromatin mobility of H2A-S129E is not due to downstream checkpoint activation, histone degradation or kinetochore anchoring. Rather, the increased intrachromosomal distances observed in the H2A-S129E mutant are consistent with chromatin structural changes. Strikingly, in this context the Rad9-dependent checkpoint becomes dispensable. Moreover, increased chromatin dynamics in the H2A-S129E mutant correlates with improved DSB repair by non-homologous end joining and a sharp decrease in interchromosomal translocation rate. We propose that changes in chromosomal conformation due to H2A phosphorylation are sufficient to modulate the DNA damage response and maintain genome integrity.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.
© 2021. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromatin dynamics; Double-strand break repair; Epigenetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33622771      PMCID: PMC8034873          DOI: 10.1242/jcs.258500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  88 in total

1.  A role for ATR in the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53.

Authors:  R S Tibbetts; K M Brumbaugh; J M Williams; J N Sarkaria; W A Cliby; S Y Shieh; Y Taya; C Prives; R T Abraham
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Sources of DNA double-strand breaks and models of recombinational DNA repair.

Authors:  Anuja Mehta; James E Haber
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T A Weinert; L H Hartwell
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-07-15       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  53BP1 and the LINC Complex Promote Microtubule-Dependent DSB Mobility and DNA Repair.

Authors:  Francisca Lottersberger; Roos Anna Karssemeijer; Nadya Dimitrova; Titia de Lange
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  The replication checkpoint protects fork stability by releasing transcribed genes from nuclear pores.

Authors:  Rodrigo Bermejo; Thelma Capra; Rachel Jossen; Arianna Colosio; Camilla Frattini; Walter Carotenuto; Andrea Cocito; Ylli Doksani; Hannah Klein; Belén Gómez-González; Andrés Aguilera; Yuki Katou; Katsuhiko Shirahige; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  A macrohistone variant links dynamic chromatin compaction to BRCA1-dependent genome maintenance.

Authors:  Simran Khurana; Michael J Kruhlak; Jeongkyu Kim; Andy D Tran; Jinping Liu; Katherine Nyswaner; Lei Shi; Parthav Jailwala; Myong-Hee Sung; Ofir Hakim; Philipp Oberdoerffer
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Live cell monitoring of double strand breaks in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  David P Waterman; Felix Zhou; Kevin Li; Cheng-Sheng Lee; Michael Tsabar; Vinay V Eapen; Allison Mazzella; James E Haber
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  DNA damage promotes microtubule dynamics through a DNA-PK-AKT axis for enhanced repair.

Authors:  Shuyun Ma; Zeming Rong; Chen Liu; Xiaobing Qin; Xiaoyan Zhang; Qiang Chen
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Michael J Kruhlak; Arkady Celeste; Graham Dellaire; Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo; Waltraud G Müller; James G McNally; David P Bazett-Jones; André Nussenzweig
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2006-03-06       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The Dynamic Behavior of Chromatin in Response to DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  Fabiola García Fernández; Emmanuelle Fabre
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Epidemiology of Δ8THC-Related Carcinogenesis in USA: A Panel Regression and Causal Inferential Study.

Authors:  Albert Stuart Reece; Gary Kenneth Hulse
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Global chromatin mobility induced by a DSB is dictated by chromosomal conformation and defines the HR outcome.

Authors:  Fabiola García Fernández; Etienne Almayrac; Ànnia Carré Simon; Renaud Batrin; Yasmine Khalil; Michel Boissac; Emmanuelle Fabre
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 8.713

Review 4.  3D Genome Organization: Causes and Consequences for DNA Damage and Repair.

Authors:  Ànnia Carré-Simon; Emmanuelle Fabre
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 4.096

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.