Literature DB >> 15121837

The functions of budding yeast Sae2 in the DNA damage response require Mec1- and Tel1-dependent phosphorylation.

Enrico Baroni1, Valeria Viscardi, Hugo Cartagena-Lirola, Giovanna Lucchini, Maria Pia Longhese.   

Abstract

DNA damage checkpoint pathways sense DNA lesions and transduce the signals into appropriate biological responses, including cell cycle arrest, induction of transcriptional programs, and modification or activation of repair factors. Here we show that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein, known to be involved in processing meiotic and mitotic double-strand breaks, is required for proper recovery from checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest after DNA damage and is phosphorylated periodically during the unperturbed cell cycle and in response to DNA damage. Both cell cycle- and DNA damage-dependent Sae2 phosphorylation requires the main checkpoint kinase, Mec1, and the upstream components of its pathway, Ddc1, Rad17, Rad24, and Mec3. Another pathway, involving Tel1 and the MRX complex, is also required for full DNA damage-induced Sae2 phosphorylation, that is instead independent of the downstream checkpoint transducers Rad53 and Chk1, as well as of their mediators Rad9 and Mrc1. Mutations altering all the favored ATM/ATR phosphorylation sites of Sae2 not only abolish its in vivo phosphorylation after DNA damage but also cause hypersensitivity to methyl methanesulfonate treatment, synthetic lethality with RAD27 deletion, and decreased rates of mitotic recombination between inverted Alu repeats, suggesting that checkpoint-mediated phosphorylation of Sae2 is important to support its repair and recombination functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15121837      PMCID: PMC400471          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.24.10.4151-4165.2004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  93 in total

1.  Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine.

Authors:  C S Gilbert; C M Green; N F Lowndes
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 2.  Cell cycle checkpoint signaling through the ATM and ATR kinases.

Authors:  R T Abraham
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Interactions of TLC1 (which encodes the RNA subunit of telomerase), TEL1, and MEC1 in regulating telomere length in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  K B Ritchie; J C Mallory; T D Petes
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Meiotic recombination initiated by a double-strand break in rad50 delta yeast cells otherwise unable to initiate meiotic recombination.

Authors:  A Malkova; L Ross; D Dawson; M F Hoekstra; J E Haber
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The distribution of the numbers of mutants in bacterial populations.

Authors:  D E LEA; C A COULSON
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 1.166

Review 6.  Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Pâques; J E Haber
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 11.056

7.  Requirement of ATM-dependent phosphorylation of brca1 in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks.

Authors:  D Cortez; Y Wang; J Qin; S J Elledge
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-11-05       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.

Authors:  J A Tercero; J F Diffley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex.

Authors:  L Xu; B M Weiner; N Kleckner
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Covalent protein-DNA complexes at the 5' strand termini of meiosis-specific double-strand breaks in yeast.

Authors:  S Keeney; N Kleckner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  70 in total

1.  Sae2 antagonizes Rad9 accumulation at DNA double-strand breaks to attenuate checkpoint signaling and facilitate end resection.

Authors:  Tai-Yuan Yu; Michael T Kimble; Lorraine S Symington
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Surviving chromosome replication: the many roles of the S-phase checkpoint pathway.

Authors:  Karim Labib; Giacomo De Piccoli
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Mechanisms and regulation of DNA end resection.

Authors:  Maria Pia Longhese; Diego Bonetti; Nicola Manfrini; Michela Clerici
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 11.598

4.  Extensive DNA damage-induced sumoylation contributes to replication and repair and acts in addition to the mec1 checkpoint.

Authors:  Catherine A Cremona; Prabha Sarangi; Yan Yang; Lisa E Hang; Sadia Rahman; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 17.970

5.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2 protein negatively regulates DNA damage checkpoint signalling.

Authors:  Michela Clerici; Davide Mantiero; Giovanna Lucchini; Maria Pia Longhese
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  A mechanism of palindromic gene amplification in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Alison J Rattray; Brenda K Shafer; Beena Neelam; Jeffrey N Strathern
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  Genome-wide analysis of cellular response to bacterial genotoxin CdtB in yeast.

Authors:  Takao Kitagawa; Hisashi Hoshida; Rinji Akada
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Genotoxic stress prevents Ndd1-dependent transcriptional activation of G2/M-specific genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Syam Kumar Yelamanchi; Jiri Veis; Dorothea Anrather; Helene Klug; Gustav Ammerer
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 4.272

9.  Phosphorylation of Sae2 Mediates Forkhead-associated (FHA) Domain-specific Interaction and Regulates Its DNA Repair Function.

Authors:  Jason Liang; Raymond T Suhandynata; Huilin Zhou
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Genetic and biochemical evidences reveal novel insights into the mechanism underlying Saccharomyces cerevisiae Sae2-mediated abrogation of DNA replication stress.

Authors:  Indrajeet Ghodke; K Muniyappa
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.826

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.